• Jrockwar@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s okay. We can all play that game. I’ve replaced my use of Duolingo with AI.

    Pro tip: have as your “system prompt” in your LLM of choice “at the end of every query, include me a short Swedish relates to my prompt”. No need for Duolingo.

  • phantomwise@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Let’s also replace the customers by AI, that way the whole system will really be “AI first” and self-sufficient.

    • Anomalocaris@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      it’s a matter of time (or more likely has already happen) where an AI company ends up having only AI users, it makes money be selling adds to show to the users, which are all AI bots, and then selling those bots as user data.

      then said company celebrates that it has no humans involved making a shit ton of profit.

      • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Right? My partner has used it for years and is now able to read simple to medium books and watch some movies in the learned language.

      • Akuchimoya@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Duolingo got me enough vocabulary in Spanish to put the simplest sentences together, and then follow more robust lessons. I still think it was a good starting point, but I won’t use it anymore on principle.

  • RedFrank24@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    So if they’re using a ChatGPT wrapper to teach me languages, why do I need Duolingo? Copilot is free.

    • Jack_Burton@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      This kind of thing is what confuses me as a business model. Take audio books for example, Audible is pivoting to ai voices. Why would people spend $20 on an audio book with an ai voice when they can just spend $1.99 on the eBook and run it through an ai voice program themselves?

        • Jack_Burton@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          True enough. I suspect that “yet” will come pretty soon though. I’m hoping all of these ‘early AI adopter’ companies fuck themselves out of business. With the tech as it is, most companies pivoting their products to AI on the user-end are just introducing a middle man. Once people catch on to it and realize they can just cut out the middle man, they hopefully won’t last long.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Copilot is free.

      Free.

      Free with ads.

      Freemium with ads.

      Free trial with tiered subscription service.

      New subscription tiers with reduced ads. Premium package for boosts to service.

      Please enter your credit card number and watch the ad to unlock device.

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    For those who aren’t leaving Duolingo, you can still get the paid features by creating a class and joining it. Or at least that’s how it worked the last time I used it, which was a few years ago now.

  • jabathekek@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    “Duolingo will remain a company that cares deeply about its employees”

    Except for the contract employees. Fuck those people.

    In 2012, we bet on mobile. […] That decision helped us win the 2013 iPhone App of the Year and unlocked the organic word-of-mouth growth that followed. Betting on mobile made all the difference. We’re making a similar call now, and this time the platform shift is AI.

    I think this is some sort of fallacy, not sure which tho. Maybe a hasty generalization? “We bet on mobile twelve years ago and won, so if we bet on AI now we’ll also win.”

      • blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah, like, I think this is a bad move for Duolingo as a company, since their code quality will rapidly go downhill with the current state of AI generated code.

        But also, if you are a contract employee, you should be prepared to be let go at any moment. That’s sort of the whole point of being a contract employee - you are only employed for the contract. It isn’t unethical in anyway for a company to not rehire employees who knew up front that they might not be rehired.

  • 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Fuck their greed, I know that the bulk of their users wouldn’t caffè if the CEO started shooting puppies on Main Square, but they can train their AI on Deez

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    If you decide to cancel your subscription and delete your account, they give a warning when deleting that says you need to cancel your subscription SEPARATELY. Just a heads up for anyone thinking of leaving like I did.

  • athairmor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    There are at least some Duolingo courses that use AI voices exclusively and they are shit.

    On the one hand, having an AI to talk to sounds like something that could be good. Getting a real person to talk to every user would be impossible. I just don’t think the technology is going to meet expectations any time soon.

    • SuiXi3D@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      They do this in the French course. Half the time it still can’t understand what I’m saying. Maybe that’s on me, but still. C’est la vie.

  • Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    if the labor cost goes down, the service should become cheaper.

    if it worked like that, i’d love to have AI replace humans.

    AI isn’t the problem. capitalism is.