- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.world
😱
Good. We need everyone to defederate with Threads
What’s the difference between “fedipact” and “blocked”?
I think it’s just the fact that they’ve additionally signed this “pact” that says they’ll never federate with them or anything else meta again. See the link at the bottom of the page.
It’s mostly just symbolic, a sign of commitment.
Fedipact is an anti meta pact that some instances have taken.
Blocked is instances that have blocked meta but aren’t part of that pact. Blahaj zone is one of the latter for example. We block threads because it houses hate groups. Were it to stop doing that, we wouldn’t block them, but fedipact members still would, because their concerns are to do with what Meta itself represents
It’s also that a bunch of them have private blocklists, but have agreed to the fedipact (seen with
:onhover
) and therefore have
The fact that ✅ means “no” and ❌ means “yes” is very confusing.
But muh agenda!
That’s not how you’re supposed to think about it. I’m paraphrasing, but ✅️ means “safe” and ❌️ is the shape of your asshole when a known evil corpo entity comes to fuck you.
interestingly my instande says fedirated while it is blocked
Surprisingly for me is lemmyNSFW straight up blocked
kbin not represented at all
I do not see sopuli on there either.
It is there and it’s blocked.
Apparently I needed to load more, and not just do a search. Thank you.
kbin.social federates with Threads
Interesting that most of the top Mastodon instances are fed rested whereas most other software, they are defederated. I wonder if it is due to how they work. Madrid in can have discussion but it’s less focused on that. Lenny has more voting and so more likely to have a consensus that shows all views agreement not just the volume. So, Madrid in would be more susceptible to bad actors simplifying their view, yet the same is possible on all.