That is not how it works. That’s not how it works at all.
That is not how it works. That’s not how it works at all.
How do you get that order with only two threads?
That should be easy on windows, but user permissions might also be enough for whatever it does.
I guess it’s just normalized.
That’s a lot of money they have stolen there.
Why would it be illegal, or unethical? I don’t really see any reason.
UserBenchmark is a joke. They aren’t just biased in a normal way, but rather they have an obsession on AMD and throw lots of weird insults like this.
This looks more like classic spambots than AI.
The thought was that it’d be closer to that, than the 12 times larger suggestion.
And yeah, I was definitely only taking hosting costs into account, because every instance is maintained by volunteers. I was also only thinking about large instances benefitting from economies scale and smarter management.
I’ll took a quick glance at that thread, will have a more thorough pass later.
I mean, I haven’t seen a “Giga Train” before. Maybe it is the world’s first.
with more than $1-2 per year. ;)
More than my own share for sure, regardless of the result of the other argument.
why don’t you wish that everyone did the same?
I do. But a paywall adds a considerable barrier to entry.
Well, at this point I would like to point out that I religiously avoid paying anything to hostile services, and that I do support the small independent instance I’m on.
Well, I guess it’s priorities. Destroying Big Tech would be pretty nice, but I’m really just here for the community.
Per user? There are instances running on like $10/mo virtual servers with maybe the same amount spent on storage.
I actually kind of enjoy the “scrappy diy effort niche” thing.
I think a dollar or two per year would suffice if all users paid it.
Can it be forwarded to a paid number?
Guess I should give it a proper look, then.
Unfortunately YT removed the ability to report spam comments recently. lol
Surely this isn’t true…? That would be so dumb.
I would expect some kind of small artifacting getting reinforced in the process, if the approved output images aren’t perfect.