• rglullis@communick.newsOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    A dollar per year won’t even cover the storage bills, much less the labor of admins and moderators.

    • Bezier@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Per user? There are instances running on like $10/mo virtual servers with maybe the same amount spent on storage.

        • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          1$ per year per registered user would be more than enough to pay the hosting costs with a very good amount of pocket money per admin. 1$ per year per MAU would be enough to pay the hosting costs indefinitely.

          To actually pay the admins and sysadmins according to their effort, it would require something close to to 10$ per month per MAU

          • rglullis@communick.newsOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I think we already established that hosting is not the real cost, right?

            To actually pay the admins and sysadmins according to their effort, it would require something close to to 10$ per month per MAU

            But then why do you keep doing this for free??

              • rglullis@communick.newsOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                Because someone has to

                Why? What is the moral imperative here? Why do you have to do it?

                not everything is about money.

                Sure, if you don’t care about any meaningful impact and just treat it as a glorified hobby.

                • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Why? What is the moral imperative here? Why do you have to do it?

                  Because people need social media and we need a way out of the centralized ones and most people just won’t pay 10 for a reddit alternative.

                  Sure, if you don’t care about any meaningful impact and just treat it as a glorified hobby.

                  I believe managing to draw people away for explored walled gardens into a system controlled by the community will have massive impact

                  • rglullis@communick.newsOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    5 months ago

                    Because people need social media

                    People also need phone service, drinking water and energy to heat their homes, etc. Are we just going to keep expecting that someone should do this work for free to them?

                    people just won’t pay 10 for a reddit alternative.

                    No, they won’t. But some of them will pay $30/year (like they are paying me) and I’m sure that I can could serve 10000 users at this price point. There are also others (like mastodon.green and social.lol) who are charging even less - but offering less services.

                    I am pretty sure that our problem is not competing with each other, but competing to those who keep offering things for free.

                    If I’m being completely honest with you, anyone that subsidizes the real cost for the users - whether is Big Tech offering free services and making money on ads or a bunch of idealistic kids running servers for people they don’t really know - are effectively making the open web less sustainable.

                    I believe managing to draw people away for explored walled gardens into a system controlled by the community will have massive impact

                    Talk real numbers.

                    • How many people (in your opinion) are needed to get out and stay exclusively in the Fediverse in order to say we have “massive impact”?
                    • How many people are going to be willing to serve everyone else while working for free? I.e, how many instances like yours are we going to need?
                    • How many people are actually going to be “in control”? Let’s say that we get 100 “community-owned” instances for 10M users. How do you see this “community-owned” dynamic?

                    I really don’t mind people running servers for free. I think that if this is something they enjoy doing it and it makes them feel like they are helping, fine. But it is delusional to think that this alone will be ever be able to make a dent in the overall system.