• oppy1984@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    This is why I switched to sceptre, they’re good quality, low cost, dumb displays.

    • TheRealKuni@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      I have an LG TV. Absolutely love it.

      However, it’s not connected to the internet so it doesn’t do any of this shit. It’s just a really nice dumb TV that has the potential to spy on me if I ever gave it a chance to be smart, and I still get to take advantage of the various picture improvements that come from having the processing power of a smart TV.

      Just need something else to do streaming if that’s what you want. Like an Apple TV, nVidia Shield, Roku, or game console. Some of those will also advertise to you, but I’ve had good experience with my Apple TV.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        I wouldnt be surprised if it randomly connects to unsecured/public wifi networks to still send the spy data if it can find any in its area.

        • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          29 days ago

          Always asume the worst with any (tech) product and any major company, and a lot of times you will be proven right later.

        • TheRealKuni@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          29 days ago

          Maybe. If they’re following the rules they need you to agree to their privacy policies, and to do that you have to connect to the internet. I know from the time I did have it connected (before they rolled all this shit out) that they would let you use the TV without those policies accepted. They would just bother you about it constantly. Since I factory reset and didn’t let it connect, it hasn’t asked.

          But that’s assuming they follow the rules. I’m not knowledgeable enough to find out if they’re doing this or not.

  • Captain Poofter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    if it’s anything like the other ai features they offer, it will be garbage and never work and slow everything down

  • obsidianfoxxy7870@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    If they ever make this a standard feature in all TVs and make it where I can’t just disconnect it from the internet, I will be using old TVs for the rest of my life.

    My TV is there to display a visual output. It does not and should not do anything else.

    • Stovetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      Luckily digital signboards will always be an option to replace TVs with if the situation becomes truly dire. The sorts of no-frills displays corporations buy to display whatever media they want in store.

      Might not come with sound, but you can pick up a cheap sound bar and it will still be better than whatever cheap speakers commercial TVs try to cram in there.

      • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        As long as my 1080p plasma tv works, there’s no need to upgrade. Going 4K would also mean I would have to upgrade my HTPC hardware, because that old APU probably can’t handle resolutions like that.

        In the meantime though, I’ll just keep on watching online videos in my living room without ads or interruptions. It’s been great even though all of this hardware is cheap and ancient.

        • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          30 days ago

          But that’s the thing: televisions are complex and can be very difficult to repair, so what do you do when you can’t buy a dumb replacement anymore? I have the same issue with cars. I would like to replace ours with an EV, but they are a privacy nightmare whereas my car’s peak technology is FM radio.

          I was thinking earlier today about how much technology waste there is because old stuff is superseded so quickly. Maybe in future we will treasure the tech we had before it all went to shit.

          • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            29 days ago

            Kit cars have been around for ages, and Framework offers DIY laptops. I think we should have kit displays as well. Surely, someone has already made something like that with a raspberry or something.

            • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              29 days ago

              Yeah, hopefully we can just buy cheap panels and put it together how we want. If that also opened up options for hackers to build entirely new display applications, or in new ways, that would be the dream.

    • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      Nahhh that’s insane. A recent 1440p/144+hz monitor is a fantastic choice and it doesn’t know how to connect to the internet.

      • tabular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        A TV used to be clearly different from a computer monitor. Hopefully monitors resist this for longer but no reason to think this can’t happen there.

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I recently bought an LG TV. I didn’t connect it to the Internet, I just use it with my Chromecast or Switch. Works great, no ads, no AI BS.

    • aubertlone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      I’ve heard this line many times from so many people.

      So basically just Nintendo and google profit off your personal information? And doesn’t Chromecast serve ads? In the background, but still?

      I fully support your decision to not connect your LG TV to the internet. I do the same thing but it’s often just for convenience. I get better performance from my devices rather than from the TV itself for whatever application.

      Just was thinking about that recently is all.

    • shyguyblue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      This is the way to do it

      I blocked my lg from the Wi-Fi after i got a “Kobe Bryant memorial” ad, while playing on my switch… TF?!

      • 5in1k@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        Do you think he thought avoiding all that traffic was worth it as he plummeted?

        • QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          29 days ago

          Okay so fuck rich people destroying the planet with private air travel—however, he was still statistically more likely to die from driving that day. And so was his daughter and the other innocent kids on that flight

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        I mean, a camera is an easy thing to block, as long as you’re aware of it, understand the implications, and have the desire to block it. Just obstruct the lens. Roll of black electrical tape, put a strip over it, done. Now, most people out there may not actually do so…

        Only becomes an issue if other services that you actually want are tied to the camera, or if the TV refuses to operate without a usable picture of the viewer or something.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        I find it highly likely that TVs cease to function without an internet connection, complete with some BS explanation about protecting your privacy or security.

        • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          30 days ago

          I can’t set my dryer to medium heat unless I do so with an app over the internet even though the controls exist to do it on the unit. I bought a window AC unit and the only remote control is an app - thankfully I was able to put that on a subnet with no internet gateway and it still works.

            • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              29 days ago

              Neither mentioned a network connection was required. The AC unit didn’t mention it at all, and consumer reports mentioned the dryer had “smart features” and an app but never said basic controls were locked behind a network connection

          • KnightontheSun@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            30 days ago

            Name them. Bosch does this with some functions too. I bought the model below and didn’t care about delayed start or whatever. I am not loading your app!

            I swear we need to start some appliance hacking clubs or something to sidestep this crap.

        • pc486@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          29 days ago

          Broadcast TV is already going that way. ATSC 3 requires an internet connection to get decoding keys. For your protection, of course.

      • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        Luckily my neighbors are way out of WiFi range and there is barely enough cell service here to send a text from inside the house.

      • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        Some TVs already have the ability to connect to sidewalk. More worrying is that every newer “Smart” TV has the ability to cast to it so if anyone ever does that using an internet connected device like a SmartPhone then bam…your TV just got an internet connection and can now send out stored data and potentially grab a firmware update.

        Surprise!

  • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    I’m about to live in a camper full of paper books. I hate everything tech has done in the last twenty years.

    • Basic Glitch@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      I would make an inappropriate Ted Kaczynski joke if I didn’t know everything we do is being constantly monitored at all times by a bunch of turds with zero sense of humor.

  • giacomo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    that was always my beef with ads, they just didnt speak to me on an emotional level

    • SolarMyth@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      Yes, it’s always nice to feel like my ads get me, you know? Its important to have a meaningful relationship with your ads.

  • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    So we pay them to do this to us? I stopped putting tv’s on the internet once I realized it offered me nothing useful. Firmware is about it and if that’s the case I’ll either usb it or put it on the internet for 5 min to do the update. Even then Samsung sucks so much with firmware the release notes for every single update are “bug fixes and improvements”… thanks Samsung.

    If I am forced to put it online or it comes up with a way to phone home on its own, I am done buying those kinds of tv’s, and I’m sure some other brand will offer one that doesn’t, even if it isn’t the best one to buy.

    • moopet@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      most firmware releases will be to fix something with the online service anyway. If it displays stuff coming down a wire from your PC when you buy it, it probably never needs an update.

      • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        I will say I had 1 time i needed it. It was my Samsung Odessey monitor. It supports freesync but I noticed when it was on there would be a slight flicker. Dealt with it for probably 2 years before looking into it. Low and behold online comments all said firmware fixed it. It worked, fixed it and now it’s been fantastic ever since. One of the only times an update on a screen did something amazing. It’s not the norm but the excception.

  • Ton@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    My LG OLED has never seen an internet connection and intend to keep it that way for a very long time: indefinitely.

    • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      Same. I have a C3 and it’s awesome. It has this feature where when you turn it off it has this nice subtle clock screensaver thing but it always shows the wrong time due to not having an internet connection.

  • filister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    Enshittification in progress. Sadly their OLED TVs are amazing, if not for the intrusive ads. It is really crap what all those companies are doing shoving ads our throats.

    I am trying to block everything using ad blockers, DNS filtering, Pi hole, etc.

    • expr@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      I just… don’t connect the TV to the internet. Never had an issue with anything like that.

      • SwizzleStick@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        This is the best way, really. Generally, you have much more control over what you plug into it.

        A display shouldn’t have anything even approaching what can be called an ‘OS’ on it. Yet here we are.

    • SwizzleStick@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      Sometimes even that’s not enough. I’ve had some questionable kit before that would just ignore the DNS settings fed to it if it thought they were no good, and fall back to something else preconfigured.

      pfSense is a wonderful tool for situations like that. Anything intended for local use only here just doesn’t get outside at all. Handy for stuff like a fire stick that only needs to be calling up a local media library.

      It can also mangle any DNS requests going out to a different server and redirect them to itself instead. You could do this without it with iptables/nftables on a generic Linux box, but pfSense makes it much friendlier.

      There are other packages that can do the same, but physically all you need is one piece of hardware as a bouncer that manages connections between inside/outside.

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        what can it do if the TV uses DoH, DoT, or something else similar? I expect that it can do nothing. unless the TV is on a separate lan with very strictly only access to internal services

        • SwizzleStick@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          30 days ago

          At that point I would expect control of it, or at least for it to respect the configuration it is given. If neither are true, then it just doesn’t go online at all. If that’s part of the main function, then I find an alternative or live without it.

          Nothing on the inside should be sending anything to the outside that can’t be inspected before it leaves, with the exception of stuff that is directly driven by a human (guests browsing, etc).

    • Darren@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      I got an LG OLED a few weeks ago. Hands down the best TV screen I’ve ever owned.

      Fuck knows what the stock OS does because I’ve only watched Apple TV through it.