I installed NetGuard about a month ago and blocked all internet to apps, unless they’re on a whitelist. No notifications from this particular system app (that can’t be disabled) until recently when it started making internet connection requests to google servers. Does anyone know when this became a thing?

We’re the courts not enough control for creditors? Since when are they allowed to lock you out of your purchased property without a court order?

I don’t even live in the US, so what the actual fuck?

  • liliumstar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I checked and this is not present on my device. It is an unlocked Google Pixel 6a purchased via contract with the mobile provider. That said, I factory reset the device when I got it, so it may have been removed at that time.

  • Sims@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    That’s just disgusting, but still so normal in the market religion. Google act as judge and executioner above all local laws. Never ever buy a phone that can’t be rooted and reconfigured. …oh, and never again deal with anything Google… …oh, or any other big US tech for that matter. …fuckit, never deal with ANY Capitalist cheater/scumbag unless you have to.

  • acetanilide@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Thanks for sharing this OP. I turned on the notifications for my browser, and when I went on FB (thru firefox, not app) one of the connection notifications was to a website I went on once a few weeks or even a month ago. I knew it was creepy but damn.

    I do have ublock origin but obviously that’s not enough. I wish i could get rid of FB but there’s 2 things i haven’t been able to replicate elsewhere.

    I’m just flabbergasted but wanted to say thanks.

  • alonely0@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Yeah it’s because they ship the same OS image for everyone, be it US on a carrier plan or otherwise. Google services has complete control over your device (more than just locking it down), and that’s what you should be upset about. For you that app is just harmless bloat, what’s actually spooky is google play services as a system app. Do yourself a favor and install grapheneOS.

            • einfach_orangensaft@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              I own a Pinephone64 allready but its still far from the baseline funktionality of a android device. It has hardware switches for the wireless modules tho…

              • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                I’ve thought about getting one, but it’ll just be a novelty until it can support MMS properly (trying to get family to switch) and battery lasts a full day. I’ll need a few more apps, but I’ll figure out how to get it working through emulation or something if the above are fixed.

    • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      You do not need rooting, just an ADB command from computer connected to phone.

      adb shell pm uninstall --user 0 com.google.android.devicelockcontroller

      adb shell pm uninstall --user 10 com.google.android.devicelockcontroller

  • Trollception@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Pixel 7 Pro reporting in. There is no DeviceLockController on my phone. Just installed the latest monthly updates a couple of days ago.

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Were the courts not enough control for creditors? Since when are they allowed to lock you out of your purchased property without a court order?

    I don’t think courts are typically involved for civil repossession.

    But it sounds like this is used when the device isn’t your purchased property, but leased on contract.

    I guess it makes sense for them to do this if people started leases, paid the first month to get the phone in their hand, then walked away with the nice new phone they paid like $35 for, to sell or just use off-network.

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Well, I would say this is what small claims is for.

      Should the bank should have keys to a mortgaged house? When you don’t own the house outright yet? I’m gonna go with no.

      And second, why is it installed by default on all phones? Really not cool.

      • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        why is it installed by default on all phones?

        Absolutely batshit.

        Should the bank should have keys to a mortgaged house? When you don’t own the house outright yet? I’m gonna go with no.

        Hmm, do they only not have keys because you can’t drive a house away?

        So obviously poverty fuggin sux and we need universal basic income etc.

        In today’s BS world:

        If we ban car repossession, what happens to car prices and access to transportation?

        Likewise - if digital repossession of phones is prohibited, will there at least be a couple impoverished people who have to use dumb phones even though they could’ve afforded a reposessable smartphone?

        Maybe a few people have to go without those cheaper phones because allowing lenders to killswitch phones causes greater harm to the whole. Anybody wanna speculate?

        • MisterFrog@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’ll just point out that phone plans (to pay off a phone) and vehicle loans have been a thing and worked fine before this bullshit.

          So yes, the level of access ought to remain the same I’d this were banned.

  • cdegallo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    don’t even live in the US, so what the actual fuck?

    I live in the US and the Google play store says this app isn’t available in my region.

  • Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Apple does it to, but I’ve only ever seen it happen when you buy your phone on a payment plan as part of your service agreement through your service provider. Kind of like if you lease a car and stop making payments they can lock the engine from turning over.

  • ymalki@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I live in Indonesia, and I have the application installed, but I don’t have a banking application, only e-money applications such as DANA, OVO, GOPAY, that’s all.

  • ɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Weird, I have project fi and don’t have this app. It could be contractually required by your service provider that the app be installed on all the phones that they sell. That’s a thing that they do.

    Who is the carrier?