• Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    lemmy.blahaj.zone has a decent amount of women and both their admins are women, it’s not a “women’s space” as one would describe since everyone is welcome there but it’s probably the closest thing one would describe as an instance “by women for women”. I am obligated to mention that it is a queer instance and that many of the women there are either trans themselves or strongly supportive of trans people, and do not tolerate transphobia or anti-LGBT sentiment (including refusal to support LGBTQ people) at all.

    • Konkyer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      As much as I appreciate the community and users at Blahaj, in my personal experience, the moderation was fairly wanting. At least a year or two ago (not sure about now), they tolerated some pretty freakish right-wing people who enabled chasers and other weird shit on their communities.

      • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        They certainly do not seem very tolerant of that now, they very commonly ban people for thinly veiled homophobia and transphobia that would normally slide on other sites. They do not even seem mildly willing to tolerate the intolerant.

    • 3DMVR@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      spinster exists but I think its the opposite where its antitrans

      • tomenzgg@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        We all pretend that it didn’t exist and do not acknowledge its presence; that’s the informal rule.

      • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah Spinster is generally considered a hate site, and consequently is very widely defederated, even from general purpose instances like lemmy.world. Also it’s less of a Reddit alternative and more of a Twitter alternative but is technically redundant since you can do everything you did on there on the real thing instead.

  • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Be the change you wish to see in the world.

    It really comes down to this: if you want your own space for particular interests, you should create one and find likeminded people to populate it. Just waiting for it to magically appear isn’t going to work. Be assertive.

  • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Reddit is pretty pro-female, what is this riddiculous gaslighting ?

    BTW, ALL of Lemmy+Mbin are pro-female as well.

  • Binette@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I was thinking of making one, but I’m not a woman, so I’ll think of something else

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Can somebody explain to me a thing about anti-feminism: as a 99.5% cishet standard regular manly man man, even from an extremely cold, selfish, objective, all-for-me approach I cannot understand what I stand to gain by this. What’s the point?

  • Eiri@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    But like what even is a social media for women? I wasn’t aware the ones we currently have were for men

    • Tonuka@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      reddit has /r/TwoXChromosomes which is one of my favorite subs. It’s a general womens subreddit, and though it obviously leans feminist it’s not its main purpose. It welcomes all genders, but remains a womens space.

      The fediverse could really use that energy.

      • poVoq@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        We used to have an equivalent on our instance, but it was constantly flooded with reply-bros and trans people complaining about the name, so we archived it as no women was willing to moderate it (for understandable reasons).

        • Genius@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Damn women appropriating witchdom. Excluding boywitches just reaffirms the patriarchy’s gendering of magic. It’s re-inventing the same gender roles.

          • Ashtear@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Neither the WvP subreddit nor the Discord excludes men from identifying as witches or from participating in discussions.

            • Genius@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Then what does women-centered mean in practice? Is it just a nothing label?

              • Ashtear@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                Woman-centered is not an absolute. One does not have to be part of a single characteristic of a group to have a stake in it, to be an ally, an advocate, a partner, a family member, among countless other scenarios.

                I would suggest reading up on intersectionality.

                By the way, all of this is covered in the subreddit sidebar, including in an FAQ in the wiki.

          • Nuxleio@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I’m sorry, what?

            It’s women-centered because it’s “against patriarchy”… not because it’s witchy. And they are trans & queer inclusive as well.

            • Genius@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              I think it would be even more against patriarchy if it was enby centered. They should change that.

              • Nuxleio@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                You need to stay away from feminism and enby activism entirely until you’ve humbled yourself and seriously sat with how problematic this take is.

                You’re not helping anybody with that. Least of all enbies/trans people. And not just because it makes us look bad either, though that’s certainly part of it.

                • Genius@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  I don’t know how problematic this take is, and since you can’t explain how it is, I’m convinced you don’t either. You’re just having an emotional reaction to deviation from the gender binary’s norms, which construct womanhood as the opposite of manhood.

      • slingstone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I wondered if they made the jump over here. Guess not, sadly. Reading that sub has made me a better man, because it offers some pretty harsh critiques of male behavior.

      • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Yeah but thats a subreddit not REDDIT itself, you can similarly start a /c/TwoX on just about any Lemmy instance.

        • JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          While I do agree with what you’re saying, I actually think a “by women for women” instance has a slightly different impact than a “by women for women” community. There are definitely pros and cons for both, though

    • 3DMVR@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Its all technically ran by trans women which is mildly interesting, like the mods of 2x and the others on reddit and here I think

  • SirSamuel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    TW: crude and insensitive joke (hopefully the spoiler tag works lol)

    ETA: lemme know if you need this taken down. Sometimes the intrusive thoughts win

    !It’s funny, blahaj.zone is full of pussies, and .ml is full of cunts, and yet there’s no dedicated space for women!<

      • gwen@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        every femcel community gets invaded by guys at some point. see: r/letgirlshavefun and r/femcelgrippysockjail. theres one that went private and thats keeping out the men really well (and is the only community im still on reddit for)

        • Ricky Rigatoni@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Well maybe if girls weren’t weird and trying to make shaving fun they wou

          I don’t know how to finish this joke I’m tired. Finish it for me i give quest xp

      • pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Are you talking about browsers/commentors? Cause almost all the prolific posters are women, unless you’re being transphobic

        • Mubelotix@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I don’t know any of them and would not even recognize their usernames. Just be real, there can’t be that many women, it’s just not consistent with Lemmy’s userbase. To me that sub draws more attention from men who view it as a fantasy. Read the comments and the posts, many of them don’t seem legitimate

          • erotador@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            i can assure you that the majority of regular posters on femcelmemes are in fact women, and many of the regular commenters as well. this is in part because of the wonderful dedicated group of posters who keep the vibe immaculate, and if it werent for femcelmemes, myself, and many other women would be much less active on lemmy.

          • pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Erotador, totallynotjessica, kewwwi, and squirrel are by far the people who post most there and they’re all women.

            My yin, I’m the one with the blahaj zone account here

    • tfm@europe.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I definitely think it should be an inclusive, not exclusive space

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Either can describe a bar that throws out Nazis or a Nazi bar, depending on perspective.

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Nah I’m demanding clarity. A clear question “Do you mean excluding TERFs or excluding women” and the answer is “I want to be inclusive”. It may not be meant as such, and I’m definitely not implying that it was, but that’s exactly how a TERF would evade questioning.

            A clear “Fuck TERFs” would have provided plenty of clarity, and been much shorter. Also, it would have said “Fuck TERFs”.

            • LwL@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Idk man “exclusionary” is literally part of terf I don’t think there’s much ambiguity there. Fuck terfs though.

              • barsoap@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                They’re also complaining about “women being excluded from women’s spaces by agents of the patriarchy posing as women”. They’re also not necessarily using “TERF” as a label. They’re using typical fascist-style “words mean whatever we want them to mean in the moment” type of stuff, hiding clear-cut positions behind pretend nuance, hence why I favour clarity.

      • Taleya@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        blahaj.zone is a great one I’ve found. Extremely inclusive, brooks absolutely no bullshit from bad faith actors.

        Is also very very queer tho JSYK