• Ledericas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    almost all the subs that “are women” are basically astroturfed by men, or some of them are male users posting as a “woman”

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Can somebody explain to me a thing about anti-feminism: as a 99.5% cishet standard regular manly man man, even from an extremely cold, selfish, objective, all-for-me approach I cannot understand what I stand to gain by this. What’s the point?

  • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Be the change you wish to see in the world.

    It really comes down to this: if you want your own space for particular interests, you should create one and find likeminded people to populate it. Just waiting for it to magically appear isn’t going to work. Be assertive.

  • StarlightDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Lemmy has an undeniable woman problem that it carried over from Reddit. I’ve lost count of the number of pathetic blokes that I have blocked on here for anti feminism.

    • AllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      yep it’s pretty horrible. any time gender issues are brought up there’s dozens of comments saying “what about the men” and completely missing the point

      • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        The response to “what about men” comments is, we’re already talking about men when we talk about misogyny. Misandry and misogyny are the exact same problem, strictly enforced gender roles. If you deviate, you are punished. The men that are caregivers are derided just like the women that refuse to rear children. Every other related paradigm punches down into the people who do not conform. Stoicism in men, histrionics in women.

        Either is a foil for the other and it’s exactly the same bullshit.

      • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        As a guy, I do recognise that men are disadvantaged in many areas and need to be put on equal footing with women-- like courts disproportionately award custody of children to mothers, regardless of how unfit the mother is to be a caregiver. But broadly speaking from my pespective, women are still at more disadvantage. I used to live in a bad part of my city for many years and have had little to no issues. However, it is a different story from women I spoke who got harrased, and another hit on the head. They said they will avoid going to the city ever again. I remember sharing the accounts of these women to other men, and the men were surprised because their experience is the complete opposite. Women are still seen as weak. And in the corporate hierarchy, men (of tall statures) disproportionately make up the board of directors and executive roles.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          Man, I have been in SO MANY internet arguments where I am simultaneously arguing against a woman that yes, men have problems, while also arguing against a man that no, those problems are not worse on the whole than women have.

          Back when the whole “bear in the woods” thing was going around misogynists would try to jump in and support me.

          Woman: “all men are rapists”

          Me: “that’s insulting and hurtful and misandrist, and also not even close to true”

          Misogynist: “Yeah! And also women are heartless bitches!”

          Me: “I don’t remember asking YOU a goddamn thing”

        • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          The court thing is not universally true. I worked in a family law firm for several years, and the practice in the courts here is to start from a baseline of equal custody and placement, and I’ve heard the same about other states. The men who lost out were the ones who wouldn’t fight, because they were convinced that the courts were biased. But hell, in one case, we got full custody and placement for a guy whose son wasn’t even biologically his! (His wife cheated, and he didn’t find out until well after they’d emotionally bonded.)

        • AllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          yep. the difference is, when women have been disadvantaged they tend to create spaces and pathways to talk about or change it. unfortunately a lot of men tend to isolate, even though they are not alone. then when they see something about a women receiving help through programs created by women for women their feelings of being abandoned by the system come up again. it’s just another way that toxic masculinity hurts everyone. the fix for that is of course feminism, but it’s a pretty massive barrier for most men to accept that.

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            Men don’t always isolate by choice. There’s a large cultural aversion to creating and sustaining male-only spaces, and that aversion comes from all sectors.

            Every college campus has a women’s club but if you try making a men’s club you’ll probably get reprimanded.

    • mholiv@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      100%

      It’s really bad and lemmy is really in denial.

      Sexism here is much worse than it was on Reddit.

      It feels like 2008 Reddit here sexism wise, except instead of Ron Paul libertarians tooting their horns everywhere we have heavy tracked vehicle enthusiasts.

      I did hope lemmy having a left leaning culture would help but it does not.

        • mholiv@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          I mean if you use the Marxist/Leninist definition of left then obviously not. But I mean left leaning in terms of the societal understanding.

        • mholiv@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          But the fact that the majority (or perhaps less than half now) of the responses literally prove the point I am trying to make proves my point downvotes or not.

          You have to remember the people who would literally unironically make such a post that proves my post are the densest of the dense.

          Most sexists, while dense, are less dense than a black hole and would not prove my point for me under such a post.

        • mholiv@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          Alas I have been show to be wrong! If not for my womanly ways I would have been the wiser!

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Try making any post that focuses on situations uniquely or disproportionally experienced by women and you get mostly “what about men” or “men have it worst” responses.

        that’s kind of just how controversial things are on the internet though.

        Evens shitposting from men will get similar responses from women, it’s just how it is now. Sort of always has been.

            • StarlightDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 days ago

              Nah but have you ever considered that the reason that you think that there is a male loneliness epidemic is because nobody wants to hang out with insufferable misogynists?

              • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 days ago

                no, i don’t think that’s a reasonable answer, because you’re doing the fascist thing of “these people are wrong they need to change, and if they don’t we can justify whatever shitty behavior we want, because we’re morally superior”

                It’s not dissimilar to a lot of nazi rhetoric.

                I think the problem ultimately stems from a disconnect in social development through out society. Feminism has pushed women forward, successfully in a lot of ways, but it has also pulled men back, in a lot of ways, that’s not necessarily bad, but there is now a void there, and there is nothing filling it in, that’s why the manosphere got so big so fast. It’s literally capitalizing on an empty market.

                If you want to solve the manosphere, the solution is simple, we need to fill in the void, and fix this disconnect that’s been happening for probably 75 years now. How we go about that is complicated, and not particularly simple, but i think it’s pretty clearly evident that the problem is aimless/directionless guidance for men especially in the last 20 years. Paired with historically contradictory ideas of manhood. Men are supposed to be strong and protect the weak, but it’s hard to do that when they don’t want it, or need it.

                Once this void is filled in, this shit stops happening, simple as.

        • mholiv@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          THIS. EXACTY THIS RIGHT HERE. THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT I MEAN.

          Me: talks about issue disproportionately affecting women.

          Lemmy User: It’s not really about women. Everyone suffers from this.

          • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            yeah bro, it’s the internet, everybody has opinions.

            “yeah so actually i think this is a big problem”

            “yeah evidently it must be a problem, but like, this has always been a problem, and seems to be a consistent problem”

            “YOU’RE LITERALLY THE PROBLEM!!!”

            Lemmy User: It’s not really about women. Everyone suffers from this.

            also to be clear, you are literally straw-manning me here, i’m not saying that “men have to suffer with women having an opinions” nobody cares, it is what it is, i think it’s interesting actually. You’re the one arguing that because people discuss topics that they find personally relevant is somehow “oppressing women”

            I’m not saying you shouldn’t shitpost about that stuff in shitpost threads, by all means do, there’s interesting dialogue in it. I’m just saying this is a common occurrence anywhere on the internet, for any community. Hell go find a community for something as mundane as lego, you’ll find the same shit there.

            Not everybody NEEDS to have their own specific issue that specifically effects them for it to be a valid or real problem. I just think this issue is far broader than most people expect it to be, ironically, i could argue you’re literally behaving the exact same way you claim i am. Because you are, and that’s exactly what’s happening.

            Do i care? No, i don’t it’s the internet do whatever you want.

          • StarlightDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            Lmao look at that douchebag’s comment history. Its arguably worse that than comment itself. God I wish there was a male loneliness epidemic because these fuckers stopped talking.

            • mholiv@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              Stttooooppp you’re giving me old school internet sexism nostalgia. 😂 That 2008 energy.

              Do you miss halo 3 lobbies too?

  • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Youre absolutely welcome to join Blahaj zone. Our wonderful administration team (both of whom are women) bans misogyny whenever it comes around to our communities. The mods for our main communities share a very aggressive moderation policy.

    • Konkyer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      As much as I appreciate the community and users, there are (or at least were) serious moderation problems on Blahaj, I did not feel safe there when I tried it a year or two ago.

      • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        I definitely cannot agree. I encourage anyone who has any issues with moderation to make a post in the Blahaj meta community. Ada and Kaity have been spectacular and have responded to every issue I have come across. There are limits, they can’t preemptively prevent any kind of moderation issue but they respond quickly.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Pfft, I’d say overly aggressive to a fault. It’s not a good thing when they’re banning people for a passing comment where the worst offence is “gatekeeping” rather than something that matters.

      • StarlightDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        It really seems like instance admins tend to do a much better job with a lot of stuff on here than the core devs. Its a shame that forking would take as much work as it would.

        • AllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          well some of the devs are too busy arguing over which authoritarian boot tastes the best, all under the guide of leftism, so yeah I imagine the bar isn’t exactly high

    • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      They also ban real users instead of the people literally calling their gender “dragonfucker” and “attack helicopter”

      The blahaj admins are trolls

      • sudo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        The pronoun was just “drag”. PJ is the one who kept calling them “dragonfucker”. You can go read dragonriders comments instead of just repeating gossip.

          • sudo@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            They were already banned for other trolling behavior, just not because they used neopronouns. Please get an actual bearing on reality.

            • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 days ago

              Sorry I’m not allowed to use that space because I called a troll a troll before the Admins felt like doing their fucking jobs.

              I’m not going back now, blahaj is a cess pool controlled by trolls.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        “dragonfucker” and “attack helicopter”

        i mean, if they’re doing it as a haha funny, i see no harm, but if they’re also being assholes, i think that takes precedent. You aren’t legally required to fill in your gender tagging appropriately so.

        • boonhet@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          I haven’t seen the attack helicopter and the joke is pretty damn old tbh, but drag at least is/was kinda funny. Drag’s profile specified that drag’s pronoun is “drag” in not just third, but also first and second person, which is an interesting concept. Drag also stayed in character in drag’s posts. Drag didn’t ever really bother people with the whole thing IMO.

        • Like the wind...@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          They are an asshole though, a serial pot stirring drama seeking troll that gets people banned for reacting to their ragebait. Yeah I identify as a refurbished ebike and you must relearn English to refer to me, and you only rather not because you agree with literal genocide. Funny!

          • cally [he/they]@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            i dont understand, please explain further. if blahaj mods have ignored misandry, that would be a bad thing. hate is generally regarded as bad, and misandry is hatred of men. therefore, misandry should be generally regarded as bad.

            • irelephant [he/him]🍭@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 days ago

              You are right, but what he is calling misandry is not misandry, and so many people like him think misandry is the bigger problem now.

              • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 days ago

                Misandry is a huge problem in the space.

                It’s why I couldn’t stand r/TwoXChromosomes anymore.

                The amount of people saying we should “kill all men” without being banned is insane, if someone typed the opposite they would instantly get dogpiled and removed.

                The blahaj admins have a record of supporting trolls and hateful people, just as long as they use the “right” language.

                • irelephant [he/him]🍭@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  I feel like the whole supporting trolls thing is overblown.
                  They said that you should still use someone’s pronouns, even if they are trolling, because it sets the precedent that its okay to ignore someone’s pronoun preference.

                  Unless there is more that I missed.

            • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 days ago

              That’s true on face value. The issue is that accusations of misandry are almost always unfounded, and only made as a way to deflect and to attack women. So when people start talking about misandry, that’s generally a red flag.

              It’s similar to how “all lives matter” is definitely a true and good value - but yet it is almost always said as a way to divert support away from vulnerable groups. So although the literal meaning is good, it is fair to assume that people saying it do not have good intentions.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        I give Ada a lot of credit. In the early days, I had the following interaction:

        TOPIC: Something about sexual/gender preferences, I don’t remember, asking people their preferences

        Me: responds with my preferences (I’m straight cis male, I like women so I’m down with post-transition trans women but pre-transition don’t turn me on)

        Some random user: respectfully asks if I would be willing to date a pre-transition trans man

        Me: I guess, but it probably wouldn’t work due to the fact that what I like about their body, they hate

        Some of those professionally offended people took a misleading screenshot of my response and started screaming about “chasers”.

        Ada did an admin post to the community backing me up and calling those idiots out.

        So unless she’s changed a lot, I don’t think she’s a troll. It would have been easy to go with the mob but she stuck up for me.

        • vxx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Still could be TERFS.

          I don’t have any deeper knowledge of that instance, just what I saw in all, so I don’t want to put anything on them. That thought just came across reading your comment.

          I have made a mental remark in the past that the posts and users on this instance are better treated from afar, though.

          • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            It’s pretty harsh to just casually suggest that a person be a TERF without any specific evidence.

  • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Lemmy is aimed at pleasing all of humanity.

    Asking for a women-centric flavor of any site is parallel to asking for a version with less men. If you’re implying there is a difference to the interests of both, I’d love to show you the Greg’s Anatomy sub.

    • misteloct@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Neigh, Lemmy is aimed at pleasing all the world.

      I am species blind. Asking for a species-centric flavor of any site is parallel to asking for a version with less horses. If you’re implying there is a difference to the interests of both, I’d love to show you equestrian sports.

      There is literally nothing different between any species, gender, or even a rock. Women, Men. Heck 1 + 1 = 3. Everything is exactly the same. It’s a soup of protons. It’s all the same!

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      i mean, i don’t see anything necessarily wrong with it though.

      It’s like making a linux specific lemmy instance, or an anarchist focused lemmy instance (the one im on)

      it might go against the principles of lemmy, but there’s nothing inherently wrong with it.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      I think there are differences in the interests of both. Can you explain your argument here, without super obscure references?

      • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        We just shouldn’t consider either gender’s interests as stereotypes. Also, if a community becomes one or the other “centric”, then on some level, it’s exclusionary.

        • Tonuka@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          You know that just because gender is a social construct, it doesn’t mean we should or even can just ignore it? You took step one on the awareness ladder but stopped before step two

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    If they’re tired of getting hit on or oppressed all the time then the communities for women on Lemmy might not be an upgrade. /joke

  • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Reddit is pretty pro-female, what is this riddiculous gaslighting ?

    BTW, ALL of Lemmy+Mbin are pro-female as well.

  • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    hexbear is heavily transfem and bans aggressively for misogyny/transphobia. Spending some time there when their recent domain crisis defederated from the rest of Lemmy was actually quite relaxing

      • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        that external opinion is usually either bigotry or supporting US empire from my experience. Other Lemmy spaces are just as likely to ban for wrongthink ie: not being pro genocide or whatever war libs are supporting this time.

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          i’ve never seen a pro genocide lemmy instance, everytime i’ve argued against it i’ve been banned or moderated on, granted my instance isn’t pro genocide, so there’s that. But that seems to be a regular occurrence on lemmy in my experience.

          I posted one thing on the one hexbear thread people used and immediately got banned lmao, what a terrible instance. I just ended up blocking the whole thing because why even bother at that point.