This has happened once before and they reversed it. But they said this last time too:

The discussions that have happened in various threads on Lemmy make it very clear that removing the communites before we announced our intent to remove them is not the level of transparency the community expects, and that as stewards of this community we need to be extremely transparent before we do this again in the future as well as make sure that we get feedback around what the planned changes are, because lemmy.world is yours as much as it is ours.

https://lemmy.world/post/3234363

  • Shotgun_Alice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Did they really do it again, fucking hell. I came here for a better experience then Reddit and I feel like it’s starting to be a worse experience then Reddit. Transparency from admin my ass.

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      …if your metric is admin transparency, how the hell do you figure that Lemmy is worse than Reddit…?

      I feel like Lemmy falls short in a lot of ways but transparency is not one of them

      • laverabe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        .ml is terrible. They actively ban people who aren’t tankies. Reasonable discussion is not allowed there. If there is one instance that should be defederated it is .ml

        • CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’m not a tankie, and I haven’t been banned.

          You sure you’re not confused with lemmygrad?

          • laverabe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Yes I know a lot of people on .ml are not tankies but .ml admin is repeatedly banning anti tankie discussion. See my other comment above. Look at the modlogs and you’ll find people being banned for critical thinking. I blocked the instance because Lemmy <> lemmy.ml . The code can always be forked.

            User accounts can be migrated to new instances with version 19

          • laverabe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            I’ve seen multiple posts from people who were banned from .ml and I looked at the removed comments and modlog myself, and people are being banned for even mild general discussion of topics debating the legitimacy of totalitarian communist policy.

            https://lemmy.world/post/12875282

            • Sybil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              this doesn’t show :

              They actively ban people who aren’t tankies.

              in fact, for evidence to the contrary, one of the biggest anarchism communities is on lemmy.ml

    • Fapper_McFapper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      You’ve hit the nail on the head. The Lemmy experience is quickly beginning to sour. They’ve received an influx of trolls and I’ve run into a few moderators now that seem to be taking harsh actions. Maybe Lemmy isn’t for me after all.

      • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Lol the Lemmy hivemind is just as fucking stupid as the Reddit hivemind. The fact that you got massively down voted for showing ANY negativity towards Lemmy as a whole proves this.

        • pop@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          yep I got downvoted, as expected. More proof. What’s a surprise. Just like Reddit

          Where have I heard it before? If my memory serves me right, it was very popular cope on another discussion platform. What a surprise. Just like Reddit.

          “dOwNvoTeS pROvE mE rIgHt”

          did you think you’re going to get a hero’s welcome?

        • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          “People disagree with me! I must be right because they’re uhhhh triggered! Yeah!”

          Conservative-ass viewpoint

        • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Maybe you guys are getting downvoted for conflating Lemmy on the fediverse as a whole with Lemmy.World.

          These actions don’t affect anyone not on Lemmy.world, assuming db0 federates with you, !piracy is still there for you

      • r00ty@kbin.life
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        The thing is, this actually if anything proves the strength of the fediverse. Lemmy.world is not Lemmy and Lemmy is not the fediverse. Just find another instance that has not blocked the community yet and carry on with your day.

        Lemmy.world have every right to curate the experience for their users as they see fit and/or feel comfortable carrying the risk for.

        • Unruffled [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          They do of course have that right, but they should at a minimum follow their previously stated commitments to consult their users before taking actions like this.

      • FMT99@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Hey it’s a free world. You’re welcome to migrate to a different instance. Heck why not run your own? That’s the power of the fediverse. Or just head back to Reddit.

    • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Lemmy suffers from pretty much every issue that Reddit suffers from. To think Lemmy is special or somehow insulated from this is the most naive thing I’ve ever seen.

      • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        That’s weird, I haven’t seen u/spez around here lately.

        Reddit was great for at least 5-10 years, the main issue that caused everyone to leave was that it became corporatized and had to start making a profit. That can literally never happen on Lemmy, because it’s free and decentralized. So yes, Lemmy is special and insulated from corporate abuse. If you can’t understand the value of that, you may as well go back to reddit.

        • Unruffled [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          It’s not free of corporatist behaviour though, especially on the large instances. This is a classic example. I guess at least people can vote with their feet, and still stay on the fediverse.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Transparency is there in the sense that the modlog makes clear that a lemmy.world admin blocked the community. If it were Reddit we’d never know how, just that it is blocked.

      • Unruffled [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Talk about moving the goalposts. The lemmy.world admins promised not to do this again without community consultation, then just went ahead and did it anyway. Just because we have the modlog doesn’t excuse the breach of commitment.

        • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’m aware of this broken promise. My comment is speaking specifically on a limited technical basis when comparing it to Reddit, which is what I mean by “in a sense”. I hope this clarifies it for you.

  • Iapar@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Spin up a piracy instance on a server in China or Russia and be done with it.

        • Allero@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          A Russian word play around Roskomnadzor, i.e. The Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology and Mass Media, an agency responsible, among other things, for censoring media and blocking access to Internet resources, as well as proceeding with criminal allegations on illegal content.

          Pozor (Позор) means “shame”.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    A lot of people are saying “just connect to another instance”, but it would be nice if the client could connect to multiple instances at once, and merge things internally, maybe even spreading the load a bit.

    Probably a bit tricky for the web and linking, but maybe something for the mobile apps to consider?

    Ideally the only time I’d need to swap accounts is to post.

    • Blaze@dormi.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      How would you deal with votes? That’s a pretty common action, and having to choose every time would be tedious

      • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        You could list your accounts in priority, and the highest account that has access to the post you’re reading will be responsible for the vote.

      • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Considering how well voting has turned out in general, maybe the voting system is the issue.

        • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          You know, I don’t even disagree with you. Voting really doesn’t bring any good to the table, it only creates some sort of hive mind mentality

          • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Plus it allows users to anonymously express disdain towards somebody, not just to their comment or opinion but them personally I’ve seen this happen on Reddit where people were mass downvoted for seemingly no reason other than being openly trans/queer.

            It only gets worse when you use that as a reputation system for restricting users because then it’s a social credit system.

  • khepri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Linking to or posting content that’s illegal or in violation of copyright should not be allowed, but you don’t have to ban an entire community to do that, you just have to enforce the same rules that are in place for every other community on here. Maybe someone can explain this to me, but this seems equivalent to banning a cybersecurity community because encryption get used by bad actors sometimes, so discussion of staying anonymous online needs to be banned since information about staying anonymous online is “sharing the tools and techniques” that could be used in assisting criminal activity. Ditto for cryptocurrency, ditto for secure operating systems, ditto for drugs, guns, and any number of other things where community discussion is allowed but illegal activity is not. I understand the need to draw the line at actually sharing copyrighted content, but discussion of lockpicks or linking to sites that sell lockpicks is not equivalent to going around illegally picking locks, except it seems that is exactly the case when it comes to piracy but no other topics.

    • JonEFive@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s not as easy as moderating individual posts. Remember, Lemmy is decentralized. If you start your own Lemmy server and I federated with it, I’ll get all the stuff you post on my instance too (intentionally oversimplified).

      Its up to you to moderate communities on your instance the way you see fit, and up to me to moderate mine. Even though our instances are federated, I can’t moderate on your behalf. It just isn’t feasible both in terms of the technology and in terms of the sheer volume of content you would have to try to moderate.

      If you have a community that posts a mix of things I agree with and things I don’t, I really only have a couple options on my end. Basically I can block that community on my instance or block your instance altogether.

      The reason why someone might block a community may be more about the legal risk than any moral justification. Depending on where you are, it might be illegal to even host that information. And since Lemmy instances cache posts from other instances, it could be argued that because that community is federated with your instance, you’re responsible for the content posted there.

      • khepri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        That’s all well and good, I agree with virtually all you said. It’s certainly the admins’ right to block or de-federate any community they want, based on risk or just because they feel like it, I have no issue with that. It’s simply my personal belief that discussion of crime is not a crime. Direct links to illegal content should not be allowed, but discussion about piracy in general should carry no more risk that learning about murder in a criminology class, which does not need to be banned just because it’s teaching people things they could in theory use to get away with murder.

    • Hate@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      this seems equivalent to banning a cybersecurity community because encryption get used by bad actors sometimes, so discussion of staying anonymous online needs to be banned

      using your analogy; it’s like banning access to a piracy community because sometimes pirates use it…

      pirates sometimes use meme communities too, but those aren’t banned, and .world isn’t completely defederated from db0, so that’s not it.

      so discussion of staying anonymous online needs to be banned since information about staying anonymous online is “sharing the tools and techniques” that could be used in assisting criminal activity.

      staying anonymous online is not a crime though. copyright infringement is a crime. that’s why the analogy doesn’t make sense.

      scenario is: people are linking to law-breaking content in x-community. therefore, .world is choosing to ban said x-community that facilitates it, to prevent legal liability.

      I understand the need to draw the line at actually sharing copyrighted content, but discussion of lockpicks or linking to sites that sell lockpicks is not equivalent to going around illegally picking locks, except it seems that is exactly the case when it comes to piracy but no other topics.

      you’re right, while lock picking can be illegal, it’s not always illegal. however, copyright law violations are always illegal.

      this law-breaking content happens to be copyright infringement/piracy material. another example a host might ban would be a community that is linking to CP, or a community that is linking to Identity theft sources, etc. even if it’s just users posting links to this sort of content, I can understand a host not wanting to expose themselves to any sort of legal liability.

  • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m surprised the major Lemmy servers even permit piracy related content in the first place. Half the Fediverse seems to be hosted in Germany, probably one of the worst countries to host piracy related content.

    The .world team should definitely make a statement before banning stuff just to avoid this kind of drama, but piracy communities are not worth the moderation hassle and legal risk for a silly side project like Lemmy.

    If I were you, I wouldn’t expect the same privacy protections Reddit provides for their users when copyright owners start sending legal threats. These instances barely collect enough donations to cover server costs, nobody is going to pay an expensive lawyer to protect your IP address if your server gets sued.

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah people are really weird about this. They want a free distributed forum hosted by small admins, but don’t want those individuals to take basic legal precautions? Piracy might be moral, but it’s a liability which will absolutely impact the viability of servers in many places. Grow up.

    • nutsack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      The Lemmy instance doesn’t actually host pirated content, does it? It’s just information about pirated content and where to find it, right? Who the fuck cares about this

      • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Links to pirated content have been deemed illegal in various jurisdictions. That said, the piracy community on Lemmy doesn’t seem to do much more than complain about DRM, so I guess the risk shouldn’t be that high?

        Still, the best way to avoid annoying letters from lawyers is to avoid risky communities. Hosting anything related to piracy, gambling, porn, or crime is just a pain, even more so than hosting normal stuff.

      • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Lemmy makes local copies of everything when federation occurs. It’s 100% on their server. The only exceptions are images posted as part of the comments, those are loaded directly. Then again, that adds the ability to add tracking pixels, so that’s not exactly great for a piracy community either.

        Image loading example

        I turned off all the logging for this proof of concept but this could’ve been a transparent PNG pixel that tracks every bit of information your browser will give it.

          • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            I’m not sure, but anything doing Markdown parsing and allowing images to be embedded is vulnerable to this. I kind of doubt that the devs don’t know about this.

            The alternative would be to download every image on the server and cache it until users start requesting the image files, rewriting the Markdown to link to the new image location. I can think of a few reasons why that’s not implemented.

            Proxying all comments was implemented in the backend at some point, I’m not sure why this feature was removed again. I can’t find much in the repo history, you could ask the devs why the feature got removed if you’re curious.

          • nutsack@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            you could safeguard against this on the client side by not loading images from untrusted sources. irc clients did this

        • nutsack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          i really wish there were a way to disable images with some of these fancy lemmy clients for android. I’m not interested in any of them

          • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Your client asks my server for the image, my server does a basic IP location lookup based on a free internet database I downloaded last year and turns it into an image on the fly.

        • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Ok so we have basically created a reddit with extra retardation and uploaded to a blockchain.

        • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I guess the question is: if you host a public forum, are you liable for things posted on it, or on separate but linked forums?

            • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              Comments like this sound like the “they write it off on tax” comments, where there’s this assumption about how complex things must work, but it can’t work exactly that way otherwise we would see it happening all the time.

            • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              Copyright laws are actually very difficult to enforce when it comes to digital piracy. You have to prove loss of profit among other things.

              Then, who do you sue? The person downloading the product? The person hosting the product? The person providing a link to the hosted data? The person providing a platform for people to link things? The person who allows their platform to federate with another platform that does?

              If we’re talking about P2P sharing, then in a way no one is hosting the data.

              In Australia when the Dallas Buyers Club case was being looked at, the studio was asking for a lot of money. Basically a big fat fine to be paid. The judge threw it out saying that the only reasonable damages for one person to pay would be the cost of the DVD because that was the value of the “theft”.

              • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                You dont have to enforce it.

                You just have to drown people in legal bills and force them into compliance with risk of bankruptcy.

                • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I don’t know enough about law to know how that does or does not work, but it that’s possible then any entity with enough money can actively bankrupt anyone they want, and it won’t have anything to do with why. If that’s true could you not just sue someone by making stuff up and force them to prove you made it up?

      • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Same, but if you’re used to the more moderated nature of lemmy.world, just be aware that lemm.ee isn’t as quick to defederate from other instances. Personally, for me that’s a plus, and it’s the reason I chose this instance. Bring on hexbear, lemmy grad, and exploding heads. I don’t care. I want to hear what everyone has to say, and I can block people or instances if I have to (through Lemmy and the apps I use like Sync and Voyager). But if you don’t want to, there are lots of other instances that defederate from those places but still federate to the piracy instance.

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        This is basically the very instance most piracy communities are hosted on, so you get extra benefit of ALWAYS having access to it regardless of defederations.

        • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Same here. I discuss a lot with .ml and besides dumping on capitalism a lot (and rightfully so), I havent seen anything supporting this claim either.

      • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I just searched “china”, and didn’t notice any authoritarian propaganda in the first 3 pages, but I counted 6 anti-chinese stories.

        The closest to pro-chinese stories that came up were that US citizens can now travel to China visa-free, the CEO of evergrande getting fined and banned from business, and some news story about economic numbers.

        Would you care to point it out to me?

        • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Propaganda isn’t obvious like that, and the core of most propaganda is truthful. Generally speaking you need to look at the big picture and what key actors want to be able to see probable propaganda.

          They’ll never say “the CCP is great and Taiwanese people don’t deserve freedom,” but they undermine people who would defend Taiwan and help shape things so an attack is more likely to succeed (e.g., supporting the Kremlin’s attack on Ukrainians).

          Not really interested in discussing it more with a Lemmy.ml user. I’ve seen too much bad faith engagement and don’t want to waste my time. Apologies if you’re actually sincere.

          • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            I think I see the disconnect, you conflate the safety of the state of Taiwan and Ukraine with the people so statements like “I don’t think we should sacrifice a million Ukrainians to weaken Russia” come off as undermining the defense of Ukraine.

            I’m certain even the pro-independence people living in Taiwan would prefer status quo to looking like Ukraine.

    • spiderman@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      lemmy ml de-federates with communites and instances without even a reason, not to say that their moderations actions weren’t questionable in the past and present.

    • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      and federates with everyone world federates with

      Not entirely true, I discovered the other day, while helping someone figure out why they couldn’t access .ml communities, that .ml blocks furry instances…

      • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Oh, nvm then. I wonder why they’d block non-yiff furry instances.

        Do you know a general instance that federates with most instances?

        • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yiffit.net, ani.social, and lemmynsfw.com. Those are the main defederations that I think are a little harsh.

          Aside from those, most of the other blocked instances are pretty egregious (mostly pedophilia and alt-right) and SJW has blocked many of the same ones.

          The only major server with less defederation is Lemm.ee.

            • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              Idk about ani.social but the other two are. Ani.social has a general anime discussion community that was created as a replacement for the anime community on lemmy.ml and has rapidly surpassed it in activity. You’re not allowed to link !anime@ani.social on lemmy.ml either.

              Lemmy.ml admins would argue they host loli/pedo content, but ani.social would argue it’s just mainstream anime content and it’s part of the genre. I don’t really know more than that, but I think it’s a bit unfair to describe the whole ani.social server as being used for porn.

            • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              ani social was anime related, but the admins banned it because they dont really like anime and just tag reasons for censorship as loli, without evidence of it. I dont even actively contribute to the anime community, but was the driving reason why i moved from ml to zip. didnt want to have to deal with unsubstantial censorship with an actual valid reason.

                • spiderman@ani.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  we don’t. i know the anime community on the internet doesn’t have a good reputation but it’s different here. @hitagi@ani.social makes sure of that.

                • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  im not doubting the possibility, but not to even provide evidence to the servers admins is a red flag on pushing the ml dev/admins agendas without being transparent about it.

                  without a level of transparency, the same reason can be used to unjustfully ban anything.

        • AceCephalon@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Hi, here’s your pretty much useless furry check.

          Double meaning entirely intentional, because funny.

    • Dultas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I believe they reversed course on that ban. It’s just recently that they reverse reversed that course.

  • denast@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Well this comment section was an interesting read. Interesting how many comments still bend the discussion towards bashing lemmy.ml and defederating from it. People, it’s not even the topic of this post?

    Also it seems like very few actually read the post beyond the title? The problem is not lemmy.world banning the piracy community, they have the right to do so, that’s how federation works. The problem is them making a promise to make announcements about such bans in advance, but they instead did it quietly in the background again.

  • Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Is lemmy.world trying to appeal to advertisers? Kinda sounds like it. Banning discussion oriented piracy subs, outlawing paywall bypassing in news@lemmy.world, etc.

      • spiderman@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        idt they need to, unless they get a letter. the chances are astronomically low for that.

    • cum@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Do they even have advertisers? Tbh I’ve had adblockers on for years I wouldn’t even know.

      • qaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        They don’t. It’s just wild speculation while in reality lemmy.world probably banned it because they got a legal notice and don’t want to get sued.

      • Blaze@dormi.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Lemmy is probably the worst place to sell to advertisers seen how many people run adblockers around here

    • Zomg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Or maybe avoiding litigation? Weird that you think of advertising first, it’s like you don’t have critical thought.

  • cum@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    This isn’t reddit. There’s a clear solution here: decentralization. Aka, like the entire point why we’re on Lemmy in the first place. Join another instance lol.

    • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Yeah that. And I say it as someone who, on a good day, will go on philosophical rambles about how piracy is in fact the moral thing to do.

      Do people just not get that this is the entire point of a decentralized system?

      Hop accounts, you lil’ bitch. Don’t sit in one server complaining about the owner of that server when you have a billion options.

      And if your priority is the piracy community? Make the server that hosts that your homeserver.

      Or just have more than one account and use an app instead of the default webpage.

      It’s not rocket science. People’s brains are poisoned by centralization. Back in my day everything was its own separate forum with its own separate account and to be honest, it was miles better like that.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        The problem with this is that it isn’t really decentralized equally. Lemmy.world has most of the users and getting defederated from them is essentially a death sentence in terms of content and engagement.

        I think it’s a good idea to make new accounts on other instances, I plan to buy without a proper amount of people, lemmy.world is working the same way reddit did.

        • Blaze@dormi.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Hopefully this will drive people to switch to another instance, and the issue you mentions will be less present.

        • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          The problem with this is that it isn’t really decentralized equally. Lemmy.world has most of the users and getting defederated from them is essentially a death sentence in terms of content and engagement.

          Self-resolving issue here. If people hop away from LW due to LW making decisions they don’t like, LW will cease being the one-go-to-place for stuff. Which is good, it shouldn’t be. No one instance should be “the main instance”. The right way to use federation is each person & community should make their home at a place where they vibe just right with the fed admins.

          Also also – Defederation is a far more nuanced thing than just “is block”. There is more than one tool that can be used by an ActivityPub admin.

          If LW defederates from your home instance – You can still manually follow communities that are in LW AND interact with them (unless the admins go out of their way to ALSO block USERS from your home instance), as “defederated from the instance” just removes it from the global timeline/global community search.

          What happened here, though, wasn’t defederation, it was a block, and a block on two specific communities, which outright prevents viewing & interacting with content from those communities from within LW. Which brings me to: LW’s block on the piracy communities from dbzer0 doesn’t stop LW users from interacting with dbzer0 as a whole. Or vice-versa. Only with stuff from the piracy coms.

    • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Make sure to cancel and if possible refund your donations to Lemmy.world before doing that as well. No reason to give them money if you’re not going to use them anymore. I canceled mine when this all started happening the first time.

        • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I never said I got a refund on my donation, I’m saying if someone just donated they might want to try getting a refund on it in addition to canceling.

        • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Great question, see when instances have management level disagreements like this there really isn’t any purpose to using their communities from a remote account.

          Unlike a lot of people who “migrated” I realize it ultimately doesn’t make a difference using these communities from a remote server because they are controlled by this one and ultimately will be affected by defederations and bans. So I only migrated my non-lemmy.world subscriptions to the other instance accounts and left the local ones on this account.

    • kratoz29@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I did that the last time and moved here ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

      Better management, no censorship, better uptimes and quicker upgrades, no need to look back (I moved “momentarily”).

      • Blaze@dormi.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        quicker upgrades

        That’s an important one, especially with how long it took LW to upgrade. I completely get why it’s more challenging for them due to their number of users, but that could be an argument for enthusiastic users to move elsewhere.

    • Lemonparty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Reddit syndrome still affects a lot of users here, who view having multiple accounts on different answers as an inconvenience instead of a feature of the platform design. The irony is that tons of users on Reddit had lots of accounts without batting an eye, but that extra step of having to lick a new instance is just SO complicated.

      • Maalus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        It is an inconvenience. Having to track which account can view which communities, with all the drama and defederation happening each week isn’t easy.

        • Lemonparty@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Picking a better instance for your main is most advisable. Users can accept that the primary benefit of a free and open source federated service can also sometimes inconvenience them, or they cannot. Complaining about the core mechanic of the technology that literally cannot change is silly IMO. Corporate owned centralization leads to enshittification. Your account age indicates that you know that first hand.

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Indeed. There are lots of proposals for perfectly portable decentralized user identities, subscriptions that transcend specific instances, and whatnot, but until those things actually arrive that’s not the Fediverse we’re dealing with. It’s a hassle having to switch instances.

        • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Centralized Reddit brain poison tbh.

          Your password manager will keep track of your credentials. If you have THAT MUCH trouble keeping track of which communities are on which server, stick to local communities.

          Back in the day we had everything be its own separate forum and no one died from that. You’re just lazy.

      • BURN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s a major inconvenience and I’ll stick to one. If it can’t be accessed from Lemmy.world it’s not really my problem tbh and I’ll just act like it doesn’t exist.

        • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’ve never noticed any defederation from my instance or drama aside from the main posts talking about it, and if you came here interested in a piracy community it’s good for that, lemmy.dbzer0.com. “Lemmy.World” seems to be where all the drama happens hah. I have only ever made one account, interact with several different instances without issue. I agree using several accounts would be annoying.