• Vespair@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    And the reality we have now is a lot of dead citizens who didn’t sign up to a job inherently involving danger. Is that a preferable situation?

    • arc@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You think there would be less dead citizens if cops waited to pull their guns until after assault? Go and watch a OIS channel like Police Activity and come back with a straight face and claim that.

      • Vespair@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think there are plenty of other options that exist before drawing weapons. And I think the comparative successes of police in other countries justify this belief. So yes, I do strongly believe that on the whole there would be less dead total, citizen and cop combined, if police were restricted from drawing their firearm until danger has been actualized and were thus instead forced to focus time and resources on necessary de-escalation training.

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I wonder how well the police killing rates correlate with civilian homicide rates. Is our police shooting problem in the US just a reflection of our angry adversarial culture?

          Glancing at the stats by country on Wikipedia, no surprises. The US is better than many rough places in the world, but the rest of the developed world just humiliates us.