• Dasus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    They clearly are, as we’d been using them prior to the enacted ban for decades.

    Would you stop being this childish? Do you not understand what “using a substance to facilitate an altered state” means?

    Unless you plan to argue that people were eating paint to get high, these semantical shenanigans will get you nowhere.

    “haven’t you heard of huffing paint”

    You apparently don’t actually know what it means to “huff paint”. The lead and the paint isn’t what you’re after. It’s the volatile solvents used, which will vanish when the paint dries. Do you know when “huffing paint” became a thing? When prohibitions were tried. People will get to their altered state, no matter what you try to do to stop them.

    Prohibiting reckless prescription of opioids in the 1990s would have averted the crisis in its infancy.

    I repeat, are you on heroin currently? Because the US isn’t the only country in the world, and prohibition of psychoactive substances (since you’re anally, pedantically, and utterly childishly still pretending not to understand what the context of this conversation is) has never worked, anywhere

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Would you stop being this childish?

      My guy, I’m laying out historical facts and your response only ever seems to be name calling.

      Unless you plan to argue that people were eating paint to get high

      There’s quite literally a name for it - Pica. And lead paint, which is sweet because it contains lead, is a common substance people with pica would consume.

      You apparently don’t actually know what it means to “huff paint”.

      The incentives to include lead in paint, to enhance the color, and in gasoline, to prevent engine knocking, have existed for decades. Exposure can be recreational, but it can also simply be by way of chronic exposure. Nevertheless, there are economic incentives for including lead in the product in both cases. And the prohibition overrode that incentive.

      Because the US isn’t the only country in the world, and prohibition of psychoactive substances (since you’re anally, pedantically, and utterly childishly still pretending not to understand what the context of this conversation is) has never worked

      It has successfully deterred the sale and consumption of a variety of psychoactive substances, ranging from LCD to oxytocin, by eliminating them from drug retailers’ shelves.