I was recently involuntarily held in a mental hospital where I went through prison like conditions (strip search, had to wear scrubs, was locked in a room outside certain times a day, stuff like that) and thankfully came out in one piece after 8 days of this crap. I was just wondering why we subject people to these conditions when they haven’t even committed a crime?

  • CaptainEffort@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I was in a psychiatric hospital for like 6 months, but like a pretty nice place (I wasn’t institutionalized or anything, this was something I chose) and heard horror stories from some of the other patients there about those places. I’m so grateful that I never had to go through that…

    I literally thought one of my friends had been exaggerating until we got a new patient and he had similar stories. Horrific stuff.

    • 667@lemmy.radio
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I play a game with my spouse when we drive past large institutional complexes surrounded by tall fences called Prison, or school?

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Because most countries use them as prisons.

    I guess you’ve only got to be attacked by a couple of people who should have been in a secure wing of a real prison before you start to treat everyone as a dangerous lunatic.

  • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Perhaps actual rehabilitation costs too much and requires too much effort, so the cheaper “solution” is a punitive environment.

    And maybe some people that come through actually are dangerous enough to warrant some of the measures, I couldn’t say.

  • Devi@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    At least in my country, you’re in there because you’re a danger to yourself or others, with weight on the latter because if you’re suicidal and lucid then they can’t section you.

    So it is kinda the same thing, like people in prison are kept in that way because they’re dangerous to the population.

    Obviously there’s voluntary admissions and stuff, but they’re fewer and the staff there aren’t really briefed so it’s easier to care for everyone the same

  • SoleInvictus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Welcome to Murica, where you have the FREEDOM to receive subpar care when you need help the most.

    I’m a fellow citizen of the bald eagle who also has dealt with psychological issues and the United States’s terrible health and mental care system. I read through your posts and saw you’re thinking of ending it. I don’t know your situation, but I’ve been somewhere similar. I have an incurable, chronic, progressive health condition that causes some disability and just hurts like a motherfucker. Not looking for sympathy, just explaining.

    I was dead set on ending it because I couldn’t imagine going through life always in pain, being a burden to my spouse, family, and friends, and just being a big overall sad sack like I was. Obviously I didn’t. I got help and worked through my giant pile of issues and I’m glad I did. I think about how I was then and my life now with my wife and friends and my stupid, silly cats and I always start crying because I love all of them and everything so much and I was so close to giving all of this away.

    I agree with you 100% - everyone should have bodily autonomy, including the right to end your life as you see fit. Just give it a lot of thought. It’s fucking morbid, but what kept me going for the first few weeks is that I could always kill myself later. I didn’t need to make a decision then, I could always make a decision later if trying to make things better was as impossible as it seemed. It was a ton of work and it really sucked sometimes but it got better. Even when things regressed hard, I kept looking for ways to keep improving because at the heart of it, I really didn’t want to die, I just couldn’t imagine living, so I worked on making a life that I could believe in.

    No matter what, don’t look at this as a failing. People like us can have a certain strength and appreciation for life that others who haven’t had to deal with this don’t understand. If you need to talk with someone who at least might get it, I’m here.

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    My honest answer is that we have dark impulses and instead of fully handling them, as a society we have just managed to channel them through institutions.

    The idea of vulnerable people being tormented by jailers is attractive to the darkest parts of our souls, and we have disavowed those parts of ourselves and hence cannot acknowledge them in order to control them.

    As a result our society manifests this sadism in many of its institutions for dealing with vulnerable people.

  • TechNerdWizard42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Because it’s cheaper. If this is in a country where you or your family can sue because of a liability of the private institution or public one, then they treat everyone as a threat. Doesn’t matter why you’re there, you have to be treated just like the psycho Hannibal. Because if you turn out to be like that, and they didn’t screen you “for your safety and the safety of the staff”, it would be lawsuits galore.

    • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Unfortunately, this seems to be the answer. Most people who are in short-term institutions like this get there through some type of psychotic break. Their incentive is not to really provide any care, but to maintain an orderly environment while the break passes (whether a manic episode, suicide attempt, etc.). This is also why they will tend to hold people for the maximum length legally allowed - they can bill more and most of them have guaranteed funding.

  • amio@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Because if you don’t keep a close eye on mental patients, some of them might hurt or kill themselves or other people - sometimes in extraordinarily resourceful and unexpected ways. It’s rare and overhyped, but the fact that it does happen means the system needs to account for it. Then add the usual amount of greed, incompetence, stigma etc., and suddenly the only way of accounting for that is, well, prison style.

    • Risk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Your explanation is surface level correct, in that it is in essence society’s justification, but ultimately they’re run like prisons because it’s initially cheaper to treat all mental health patients the same and because there might be one individual that is a danger to themselves (and even less likely, others) then we get the ‘prison-style’.

      The trouble of course comes in that in the long term this model likely costs far far more, because it’s incredibly damaging as human brains don’t fit in boxes.

      • Venator@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Ita probably also a revenue gathering tactic for private psych hospitals: just like private prisons have no incentive to reduce reoffence, private psych hospitals have no incentive to help patients reenter society.

        • SoleInvictus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          You and many others probably know this already but for those that don’t: in countries like the United States, private prisons actually lobby to make it more likely that previous offenders will return to jail. They seek stricter sentencing so offenders are incarcerated longer and to remove funding for nonprofits and programs that provide rehabilitation.

          Relevant article: https://www.aclu.org/news/smart-justice/private-prison-giant-corecivics-wants-corner-mass

          Just let that sink in. There are human beings that are doing their best to make sure people fail and are punished without rehabilitation, hoping they become trapped in the prison system, all so shareholders can make a buck. How fucked up is that?

  • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Someone got hurt/killed by something smuggled in. So the hospital got sued. The hospital thought, I guess we need to strip search everyone to make sure that it doesn’t happen again because that was a lot of freaking money. Later, there was a physical altercation. Or several. And there weren’t enough workers to keep everyone safe. And patients got hurt. So the hospital got sued. So the hospital thinks, we’ll just keep these people locked up so they can’t attack anyone else, and our workers aren’t so overwhelmed.

    This could all be fixed if they hired more people, had more training, basically spent more money. Why don’t they do that? you may ask. Well, you see, they keep having to pay these lawsuits…

  • cerement@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    because we’ve been propagandized that mental health is a moral failing rather than a societal failing …

  • Traejen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    In theory it’s for safety, both for the patient and the workers. A lot of the point of inpatient facilities is to monitor the people, and ensure they can’t harm themselves or others, while their circumstances or medications get sorted out.

    That’s not to say every facility is perfect, and that’s not saying anything about you. But generally, it’s for their own good.

    • AlissaSameer@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah when I complained about my treatment, they said it’s for my and others safety and to calm down. Even if they’re right, it’s still a really horrible experience.

      • DessertStorms@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah when I complained about my treatment, they said it’s for my and others safety and to calm down

        So they gaslit you in to complying with their ill treatment…
        There is zero logic to the idea that treating mentally ill people like shit is actually helping them, and anyone trying to convince you otherwise either has a vested interest in maintaining the status quo and/or is just a run of the mill ableist who thinks we somehow deserve it for being such a pain in their asses.

        Edit to add: I’m truly sorry you’ve had this experience, and that you weren’t only gaslit about it by the staff at the place, but also by people here using the textbook abuser line “it’s for your own good”. The first and most important thing anyone who actually cares about your wellbeing can do is to hear you, and treat you with the same respect they would treat someone not in crisis (or even better, but worse??? and then twist it in to being your fault? fuck that, and fuck them).

  • rowinxavier@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I have some experience with mental health in Australia and it is pretty dire honestly. There is a constant sense that the staff are concerned first with making sure you don’t hurt yourself because that would be a breach of their duty of care. This unfortunaty made much of the interaction between staff and patients adversarial.

    I am currently entering the individual suppory industry and we have a concept called dignity of risk. You have to remember that people are entitled to take risks that they consider worthwhile regardless of what you think. This means if someone wants to smoke weed that is their choice, I can’t stop them. If they want to drink that is their choice and I have to respect that. This is because they are their own people and have their own autonomy.

  • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Two reasons.

    One is to ensure people do not come to harm or allow harm to others. As harsh as it seems, the whole point is to stop people from killing themselves or enabling someone else to kill themselves.

    The other is to prevent illegal drugs coming in to mental health units. Unfortunately mental health services are also overwhelmed by social issues and drug use is rife. The units don’t want to deal with high patients who can be aggressive or even OD.

    It can seem harsh but it’s not like a prison. A prison is punishment, while a mental health unit is often a place to hold someone in a crisis so they can’t harm themselves. The loss of freedom and dignity can feel like punishment, particularly on over stretched understaffed units but they’re trying to save lives. It’s a blunt tool as a last resort.

      • MashedPotatoJeff@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        If someone has been involuntarily committed it means they’ve already shown an intention to harm themselves or others. So the goal is not to stop them from feeling bad but to physically prevent them from doing harm.

        • Jojo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          The trouble is that there’s often not a difference in treatment between being involuntarily committed because you’ve demonstrated that danger and you checking yourself in because you can’t take care of yourself right now.

          • accideath@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            I cannot speak for the US but here in Germany we have different types of mental hospitals. Broadly there are open and closed asylums.

            Closed ones are for people who are an immediate danger to themselves and/or others and open ones for people who just need therapy and a bit of supervision.

            In open psychiatries you’re also allowed to keep your phone and get visitors (and sometimes even go home on weekends) while in closed ones, depending if your acute or not, you might have the privilege of free movement within the station or you might be confined to your room unless under direct supervision.

            • Jojo@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              I mean, the US medical system is terrible in basically every way, but it’s nice to know it’s worse than everyone else in this particular way, too.

              I expect there’s probably the “rich folks” version of your open asylums that are marketed like “mental health retreats” or something and cost as much as a house, but generally if you don’t have the luxury of shopping around reviews for the hospitals you’re staying at, you’d just wind up in a “closed” one here. And the person who needs to check in because otherwise they know they won’t eat for a week probably isn’t checking reviews.