• Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Oh no all those developments that they introduced all going to stop, like nothing, bugger all, and zip.

    They literally didn’t do anything, they announced the car I think they had a concept vehicle which looked very apple, and then they did nothing at all ever again.

  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I was genuinely looking forward to them refusing to install airbags because it compromised the dashboard being 100% screen, and then later installing airbags in a “notch”, but calling them iBags, and advertising them as a revolutionary new feature that only Apple could think different enough to invent.

    • neutron@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Courage. You need to put courage to charge extra few grands somewhere to complete the apple experience.

  • morrowind@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    lmaoooo, I’ve been saying for years there’s no way in heaven or hell apple is making a car, and now look what happens

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I have to say that I’m still not convinced they were. It’s just so far from their core business I don’t see how it ever could have been real

  • Raxiel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Aww and I was looking forward to a chipped windscreen requiring the replacement of the entire cabin, unless the car had ever been in the rain, in which case fuck you buy a new one.

  • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Thank fucking god. Imagine the kind of monetization that would exist inside an Apple car. You think subscription seatwarmers are bad, and they are, but I can guarantee Apple had much worse in mind, and that most companies would simply follow suit.

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      They would come up with a charging port that only existed in the parking lot of Apple stores

    • dan1101@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Or blaming customers for problems, “You’re shifting it wrong.”

      • meco03211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Not sure if you’re aware that EVs don’t “shift” or if that’s an indictment to the level of idiocy that would likely be employed by Apple.

        • dan1101@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Yeah I’m aware. There is mostly no reason for EVs to shift, but Toyota was trying to add a manual transmission to an EV for some reason.

          But “you’re shifting it wrong” would be a scenario like the car wouldn’t shift from P to D and Apple blames the driver.

        • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s a reference to an actual response from Jobs when the iPhone 4(?) had a bad antenna design.

        • Mac@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Porsche begs to differ.

          All you had to do was a basic search for what EVs have multiple gears, but you didn’t.

          • meco03211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            What I like is that a bunch of idiots seemed to take offense to my comment which was meant more as a joke. I do admit I wasn’t aware there were EVs with gears. Though this is mainly because I won’t be in the market for my next EV for hopefully years. When I was looking into it, it was largely seen as unnecessary.

    • gian @lemmy.grys.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Up to a certain point only. In most places you cannot hope to be able to sell a car that has not a minimum set of features mandated by the law.

      And Apple cannot hope to compel states to change the rules just because so they can sell their car.

    • Thatuserguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Genuinely, this is the best news I’ve heard in a while for the reasons you listed. Apple is already fucking up the phone industry with anti-consumer policies that become industry trends. I shudder to imagine how deeply and irrepairably they would have fucked up the car market for consumers.

    • lemmy_user_838586@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      They might have pulled the luxury brand “buy once, cry once” approach and made all those upgrades a single insanely high fee. “Base model is this, but if you want seat heaters that’s another $8,000, if you want lane assist, that’s another $5,000” etc etc

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        “Base model is this, but if you want seat heaters that’s another $8,000$10,000, if you want lane assist, that’s another $5,000 $25,000 and requires a 512GB storage bump for $2,000”

        Ftfy to more realistic numbers

      • joneskind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        TBF This is how luxury car manufacturers sell their options. Always have been.

        Space Karen sells his false self-driving option for €7500 as a software option.

        • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yes, but historically the purchase of an option included the physical installation of that option and its associated hardware. Not just turning on parts of the car that are already in it, after you bought it.

          To be clear, I don’t think anyone is arguing that options should not cost money. We’re arguing against A) recurring subscriptions, and B) paying more money to activate features already built into the car you already bought.

        • dimath@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          I know the current circlejork but last time I’ve checked the self-driving required an additional processer inside the car.

          • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            For many options in cars, the sensors and electronics are already built in but disabled in software. It’s cheaper to build while optimizing profit with options.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Maybe the i-bike is more appleish? Imagine this, it’s a bike like other bikes, but you only need to pedal with one leg, and if you turn the pedal, the whole bike turns. Tilt it back to stop. Sure, you may look fucking stupid running around with only one pedal while your other leg does nothing at all. That’s it. Oh, and it’s white and smooth in gorme plastic-like design. You can charge your bike but you must remove the seat and turn it upside down using our special turning device since it’s 700lbs.

    • weeeeum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      That would actually be a terrifying precedent. “Can not pair phone to iCar™. Please use an iPhone next time, moron”.

      A massive corporate monopoly enforcing the use of its devices by purposefully removing cross compatible functionally between different platforms. Spineless governments don’t do anything cause they are toothless and on the payroll.

      • kandoh@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        As more of our lives move online and we become more dependent on technology, soon we’ll only be able to live our lives in the way Microsoft, google, or apple give us permission to.

  • badaboomxx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Maybe they relized rhat they cannot trademark the itire and remotely lock it, and sell it for 20 times the price of a regular tire.