Yknow one great thing that costs about 1.99 (one time cost)?
Those little plastic slidy bits that cover up the laptop webcam and mic.
Some laptops come with that built in, or you could use some scotch tape and a little square of paper for free
I used the sticky part of a post-it before I had a laptop with a built in slider
I use a small piece of blue painters tape
It’s weird that people used to be concerened with covering their laptop camera, but people don’t care about their phone camera.
i really miss pop-up cameras on phones.
good peace of mind knowing the fucker is tucked away inside.
“Most of the time your phone is in your pocket” he says writing on his phone…
They can probably guess your shoe size and leg length using the accelerometer. Also if you’re right or left handed.
You can’t guess correctly someone’s shoe size and leg length using an accelerometer. There are factors that drastically change the results.
Enough data over time I bet you could. Get a couple drop recordings, arm swing, common heights of beds/desks/chairs, you could find it.
Would it be automated or easy? Hell no. But you can do it. We’ve discovered more with less
Everyone’s bodies are all different in unique ways. Also some might have a limp, or crutches, prosthetics, different size feet, wider feet, extremely small feet(while being tall). There would never be enough data. Unless you were there in person measuring.
Well, you have angle of tge thigh and speed and time between strides, giving us stride length assuming their phone is in their pocket, which would be easy to tell. Then you have foot on floor over time and speed, which would give you appoximate shoe length depending on their foot fall. But you could guess that based on axis bounce/force. You could probably guess their weight and gender too.
You could track when people piss.
The real goal is to then charge the user $2.99 to block their camera from being turned on.
Make it an auction
“fuck, I don’t have enough money for park avenue”
Join the NSA and get paid for it
I’d honeytrap this with a software camera that just plays filth and shock sites on a loop :)
This, but it’s not a loop 😏
The goal with software like windows is to eventualy take away all control. If you can run unaproved software, you can’t even join the teams call. Then you will see stuff like this.
I own a small USB stick that acts as a camera. But in reality it’s just a HDMI input on the other end. Now beat that with software
Just wait until webcams start cryptographically signing image frames to ensure their authenticity.
Point webcam at a screen, or maybe a white wall with a projector pointing at it
Joke’s on you - I do this already. Porn and all
tape, and worst case scenario: a hammer
Think Canon tried that years ago with some SLRs - expecting that tech will be the only thing that proves anything someday. Wonder if it’s panning out.
Wonder if it’s panning out.
Really depends on the lens.
Hehehe
Years ago, I’d laugh at this.
Yet it slowly becomes reality with every passing year. It’s bad enough that we’ve essentially lost pay-to-own in favour of subscription models for a lot of popular software.
On our corp network, the amount of GPOs I’ve had to mangle together just to make Win11 usable is insane. The users are still going to have a fit in October.
tbh I’d be more likely to want to turn it off
You’d get a pious, stating that someone paid 1.99 to turn your camera an. For just 5.99 you can make sure it stays off.
This could also be implemented as a bidding war like eBay.
This is like that libertarian/ancap copypasta.
Is this legit? Brave’s AI summary claims that Teams indeed gives this option to the host. However, it points to a Teams documentation page that does not mention such feature.
AI
Why would you trust any AI like that
I don’t blindly trust AI responses. However, that was way too concerning not to ask about it, considering that I work from home and that we use Teams.
so you asked the word confetti bot
Have you done a brave search recently? It automatically tries to answer.
It’s actually been surprisingly good for me. Better than Google, at least. But it’s not a choice on his part, it’s default behavior.
Since the answer of the AI seemed misleading, I asked here to confirm.
I love bluetacking my webcam
I wish I could. However, the device belongs to the company. And sometimes we need the cameras. We used to have Thinkpads with built-in switch-like mechanism that blocks the webcam, but the newer laptops have their camera exposed.
Cellatape with an end folded over
Holy shit.
He’s at -22 right now, and you at +41.
He obviously isn’t trusting the AI, he’s asking here to verify it since he couldn’t find any first-hand information to contradict it.
Lemmy is already getting to be more fucking toxic than reddit. JFC.
Arguably people don’t like the USE of AI regardless of whether the user thinks it’s trustworthy.
Yeah, it’s a scary word.
I get the hate for it, especially around resource use, and it’s overuse everywhere. But it’s still the early days and it’s certainly going to evolve. I imagine if people were as environmentally conscious in the 60s, they’d be up in arms about rooms full of hot glowing tubes doing arithmetic. Eventually, though, they got to be far less resource intensive.
Also the AI response is default behavior in Brave search…and many other searches. For me, Brave has probably been the best of the bunch, but that’s not exactly a high bar.
It’s also the pure insistent annoyance of a tool being inserted into everything we use in daily life which spits misinformation, plagerizes real human work, and is being pushed by big tech to such a degree for no apparent reason. Furthermore it’s intent, from tech’s point of view, is to cut labor, which it doesn’t do. What it does is allow for layoffs of well paid labor and rehire at a lower pay as AI jockeys who just clean up the mess after it.
The hate is grounded on a lot of factors which the “worst it will ever be” argument completely misses the point on.
AI will never improve to the point where it can be considered trustworthy.
Counter point: Lemmy has always been more toxic.
I’ve never seen a group (as a whole) that’s less capable of accepting that there are things they don’t know, or other viewpoints.
It’s been that way. Who would’ve thunk a bunch of edgy redditors are insufferable?
lol. Yup. We aren’t the cream of the crop here like some egos would have themselves believe.
Lemmy is better than Reddit in every way. This means the platform itself better, but it also uplifts all users. This leads to better posts, better comments and better voting behavior. It also enhanced the innate abilities of Lemmy users to be toxic as hell.
So what I’m trying to say is suck it bitch.
This…checks out.
I take comfort in knowing that votes on here don’t actually matter much.
Because AI hallucinates and isn’t a trustworthy source to find out info about anything
They don’t hallucinate, they just believe everything they read on the internet. They are basically Republicans.
Then why would you bother using it and wasting energy and water?!
Are you talking about AI or Republicans, because that could go either way.
And it’s the default behavior in Brave search.
It’s either my broken self or a symptom of the time that I cannot tell if this is a honest question. I hope it isn’t.
Just in case: It’s not a real thing. Yet.
It was an honest question. I have seen various other horrible features, like Glassdoor allowing paying employers to remove negative ratings, so I freaked out a bit in case Teams has hidden features as well.
I know this is shitpost, but since there was another indication of such feature existing (although untrustworthy - the Brave Search’s AI summary), I wanted to confirm.
Beyond the other answers stating that this isn’t real:
Teams doesn’t do one off charges for functionality like this. All functionality is managed by licensing, managed through your workplace’s Azure tenant. Don’t have the license, don’t have the feature. Need the feature? Time to work with Microsoft billing to get you a new license (or additional one) and then your IT team to have the license applied to your account.
There aren’t usually any upsells displayed to end users. In our environment we’ve only seen a rare “this functionality is not available on your license, go complain to your admin” type message, but usually it just doesn’t display unavailable options.
On top of all that, Microsoft is dumb, but not this dumb. Last thing their team of lawyers would want is for them to be involved in some sort of “involuntary pornography” case or something.
Need to print one of these
What app is this?!
This is the new version of Microsoft Tesms
My camera has a cover 😂😂😂 I hope you like your screens pitch black because it’s the only thing you will see
But i thought everyone helicopters during meetings. How else am i supposed to meet my step goal
Don’t try this in an elementary school virtual classroom, or you have a chance of going straight to jail
Shit, I’d pay more than that each time.
love my frameworks mic and camera hardware switches.
One of it’s greatest features.
Fortunately, browsers have safeguards against this sort of thing (activating the camera without user interaction)
…right?
Both my work laptop and personal laptop have mechanical shutters that can only be opened by hand.
They’re both Thinkpads.
They hand those out at conventions too (or you can buy them, I guess). It’s basically just a small sticker that you can just stick over your shutterless camera and now it has a shutter.
One of the main motivating factors for me to get a Lenovo.
Mine is a T14 G1. Work supplied a T15 G2. I like them, solid units.
I have both a t14 g1 and g3. With each generation, the keyboard gets more trash. I even tested out my friend’s new recent generation x1 carbon yoga and the keyboard was also bad. Lower travel and didn’t feel as solid.
Most Dell latitudes and precisions also have a physical shutter.
I love that feature. It makes me more comfortable around the computer because no one can look at me without my consent.
I’ve had a few Dell Latitudes, none of them had a shutter 🤔
Which series how long ago?
I doubt the 3000 series has them because they suck, but all the 5000 series laptops I have used have had a shutter. Granted, I’m only really referring to laptops that released within the last 7 years or so.
I currently have a latitude 5430 and a brand new precision 3490 and they both have a shutter, but that’s not too surprising considering that they look identical to each other.
Just last week we found a bug in our system in that if an user accepts a meet on pc while also having the phone app open, the meet is opened in both devices, - that alone could end very badly.
Zuck always has a piece of tape over his camera when you see his laptop. That’s all you need to know.
I saw probably the same photo as you! The article wasn’t even about that, we just noticed it in the photo. I immediately went and taped over my camera.
TBF, dude has probably the entire world trying to hack him, the avergae person doesn’t have that high of a risk.
In my experience people click accept without reading or thinking, and usually remember this setting which they may have already done previously.
In any case all my cameras have physical blockers
It’s a fucking joke and so many of you are being smug with “not me!”
Half the userbase is on the spectrum, and cannot discern satire from a serious post.
Not me!
Not me!
