• queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    The Houthis were not attacking all ships. They were only attacking ships connected to Israel, the US got directly involved to defend Israel. Now they’re attacking US and UK ships too, but only because of the unlimited support and defense for Israel.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        🙄

        It’s the UKs fault for the unlimited support and defense of Israel’s genocide (not “the Jews” but specifically the settler-colonial Zionist entity literally created from the British mandate). We supposedly have a duty under the genocide convention to prevent genocide, after all.

        • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          The Houthi flag literally displays the words “Curse upon the Jews”. And that flag is 20 years old.

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                And anti-Semitism is not an excuse for genocide.

                The Houthis having problematic views about Jews doesn’t change the fact that their attacks are directly motivated by the genocide. If Israel stops the genocide, the Houthis stop attacking. Simple as.

                • obviouspornalt@lemmynsfw.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  If Israel stops the genocide, the Houthis stop attacking.

                  That’s a weird way to spell “as soon as Iran stops fighting a proxy war against Western interests, the Houthis stop attacking”

                  The Israeli actions merely provide pretext.

    • sugarfree@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      They don’t get to launch missiles at any ships lol, that’s terrorism regardless of their stated motive.

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      They were only attacking ships they claim were related to Israel, no one with a brain stem should believe them. We already know for a fact they weren’t.

      • bartolomeo@suppo.fi
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Actually if you do a little reading you’ll find out that they are. Ownership of large vessels is intentionally convoluted so as to lower the tax burden of very wealthy people, so when people without a brain stem see a Marshall Islands flagged ship they say “wElL tHAt a’iNT isRaEL tHEm hOOtiES is atTAcKin uNdiSCRiminiTLikE!!1” but actually, well just check it out below.

        https://suppo.fi/comment/2333753

        • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Link is dead so im gonna list the attacks I looked into and still remember.

          So those 2 Russian oil tankers were actually owned by Israel? A few other “connected to Israel” ships I remember were 1 officer on board a UK ship was from Israel and some business guy was a member of the board in the company that owned another ship. The vast majority of ships getting attacked have come from or gone to Saudi Arabia and India.

          They are just doing Somali pirates 2.

    • festus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      They literally hit a ship a while back heading to Iran - they “say” they were only targeting ships to Israel but in practice they’re targeting every ship that goes through the area.