The push comes as India seeks greater regulatory control over global tech companies. The initiative would require manufacturers to include the government’s GOV.in app store and related apps like BHIM, DigiLocker, VoterID on smartphones sold from India.

Beyond pre-installation, they also requested that their apps be available for download outside the company’s app stores from third-party sources without triggering “untrusted source” warnings.

  • Nobilmantis@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I don’t see it necessarely as a bad thing. I would rather have my gov id app (for taxes, id and driving licence, public services info) on my phone when i buy it, rather than candy crush and other fucking bloatware. I think it would also help a lot of non-tech savy users set up their phones quickly.

    Second of all, gov ID apps having their own store on the side is good. Them being only available on google’s store makes it so that if you want to access public services from your state you have to go through google (?), it is clearly not acceptable by a government standpoint, It is even worse than a monopoly.

    • trolololol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      So you want apple to help pre installing something so you didn’t depend on Apple when users actually want to use the app. Can you tell me how this makes sense?

      • Nobilmantis@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Its not about nicely asking apple for “help” pre installing some apps, it is forcing them to open up the os to different software sources.

        • trolololol@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          So, no pre installs needed, all they want is what the EU did.

          We don’t need an article to say that.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      I would rather have my gov id app

      I’d rather have none of that. Give me basic system apps and an app store, and I’ll handle the rest.

      If an org wants stuff pre-installed, there should be an option for rolling out a batch of app installs when issuing a new device (probably exists?). Outside of that, leave the base install as bare as possible, and give me an option to import everything from my old device (exists).

  • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Wild how many people preach from their high horse every time a non-western country does this, as if there aren’t western backdoors built into all of these.

    I’m against all government backdoors and spying efforts, but let’s not pretend they’re attempting anything the west has not already successfully done. There’s definitely an air of racism to the double standard.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      The EU does not mandate that Apple preinstall government apps. Stop lying.

      The EU went the other way and mandated that more apps should be uninstallable.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Lying? Please.

        The EU government told Apple it had to change what it does with its phones because the EU government said so. India is now doing the same.

        Keep your shirt on ffs.

        • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Every government tells every phone maker what to do with phones. You can’t, for example, have them using restricted frequencies. Funny that you think you have a gotcha there.

          Trying to equate mandating that the user can uninstall apps if they want (a massive win for the consumer and good for competition) to mandatory installation of government ID apps is hilariously pathetic.

          • Optional@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            Apparently the mod thought it was okay for you to accuse me of lying but not for me to tell you to fuck off.

            To each their own I guess. Good luck with your lie catching.

    • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Fucking propaganda. It seriously enrages me how people like you have become so programmed that they’ll attribute everything to an organization you’ve been told to hate. Don’t you ever stop and see how you’re being used?

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        What?

        What the absolute fuck are you raving about.

        Here’s a thought: Try using the letters on the keyboard to form words, which then would connect with each other to create a larger meaning in the hope you don’t sound like a rabid drunk with a hornet up his nose. Go on. Give it a try.

      • kautau@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        lol yeah the EU mandates that users can delete more core pre-installed apps. It’s literally the opposite

        Apple will let users delete core apps, including the App Store, Messages, Photos, Camera, and Safari, for the first time.

  • ElPussyKangaroo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’ll be the paragraph guy today.

    BHIM stands for BHarat Interface for Money, a payment application that uses India’s money transfer protocol called United Payment Interface (UPI). This makes all payments cashless, from ₹1 to ₹1,00,000. No transaction fees, as of yet.

    Digilocker is a government document vault app that allows digital copies of documents to be enforced. You don’t need to carry around the physical copies, the QR code generated by the app is scanned by specialised scanners that validate the validity of the document and also fetches any relevant records. This includes the Driver’s License, Aadhar Card (Indian National Identity Card), PAN Card (Permanent Account Number; used for what is essentially a 2 Factor Authentication system of documents for verification of identity), etc.

    Voter ID app is to identify your voting region, and make any changes to the details of your Voter ID.

    The Gov.in store is new to me and I don’t think I need one more store on my device, but hey… I don’t use an iPhone 😄.

    Why is all of this not a single app? Idk.

    Coming back to the point, I don’t mind having important apps like these pre-installed. It helps to have these for people who aren’t as technically inclined as you’d hope.

    • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      BHIM stands for BHarat Interface for Money, a payment application that uses India’s money transfer protocol called United Payment Interface (UPI). This makes all payments cashless, from ₹1 to ₹1,00,000. No transaction fees, as of yet

      In addition to BHIM, there are lot of third party apps for UPI.

      • ElPussyKangaroo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Lmao. No. UPI is an open standard I think… Open as in you can apply to use it. It is run via the Reserve Bank of India to ensure safety and validity.

        But no. None of these are open source. Location tracking is, I think, not across them all…

        UPI apps use it because it’s easier to pinpoint where a payment was made, thus ensuring you can verify the payment receiver. That’s all I understand about it atm.

      • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        I mean they are known to be invasive, even trying to ban VPNs so don’t be too surprised lol

    • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Why is all of this not a single app?

      Because they have very different functions though all associated with the government. It’s just better to separate apps with different functions.

      Thanks for the explanation.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I don’t know why you’d think that? Apple is a publicly traded company that ultimately cares about profit and nothing else.

      They already comply with a bunch of stuff in China and other places, why would India be any different?

      • plz1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        To my knowledge, they don’t preload non-Apple apps on any country, including the full fascist ones.

        • Miaou@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Doesn’t Facebook come preinstalled on iphones? That should be their #1 advertising angle

      • kipo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yep. Late-stage capitalism incentivizes and rewards unethical behavior.

  • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    What are the nature of the apps? If it’s just things like digital IDs and government services, that’s not bad since it helps tech illiterate people accessing them. Big room for fash fuckery though.

    And as always, preinstalled apps should be deletable.

    • hddsx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      No. If you allow one country to shirk the norm, other countries will also start pushing

      • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        I don’t think the slippery slope argument works here, you can object to any rules and regulations by saying other countries would start pushing bad rules and regulations if you comply. It’s not all or nothing.

      • Shabablinchikow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Russia already has a norm to show “Russian apps” the first time activating an iPhone or iPad, so that ship has sailed

        • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          The ship hasn’t sailed; the more countries you let do that, the more problematic the precedent becomes. This isn’t a binary thing.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            It really should be a binary thing. Company policy should be to ship the same, base OS to every customer in every country, and the only differences would be configuration for things like which radio bands to activate.