• EvilBit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    No responsible board should sell as much as a paper clip to this sociopathic weenis piss baby.

    • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      What? It worked out for Twitter shareholders though.

      What bothers me about all these political posts is when people act surprised when profit seeking people act purely in their self interest.

      I agree it’s bad, but it’s weird to be constantly mad about things so obvious like parasites acting parasitically.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Responsible to who?
      Of course they will sell if there’s a profit to be made. Companies exist to make profits, if they can make a profit from it, it’s actually their responsibility to the shareholders to do it.

      Maybe you mean responsible in some way that has to do with morals, but if you think morals apart from staying within the law, have any say in this whatsoever, you are being very naive. That’s not at all how the system works.

      That said I don’t see any other way than corruption for Musk to be interested. Musk buys Intel, and Trump doubles the subsidies to Intel and give them extra sweet government contracts. And everybody profit, except the stupid taxpayers including those that voted Trump.

      Only the law helps super capitalist narcissists to stay at least somewhat within moral norms.
      And in USA the law doesn’t even count anymore. So there you go, everything is fucked up, until Americans figure it out. Which means it will be fucked up for a loooong time.

    • breakingcups@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Now give me an example of a corporate board at Intel’s scale being responsible when given the choice between being responsible or buttloads of short-term profits.

  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Yep, he’ll do it, the Trump administration will rubber stamp it. He’ll probably just keep doing such. Who knows what will happen when someone has all the money on the planet.

    …I guess that person’s lineage just rules supreme however they like?

    • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Elon is too self obsessed to properly train a successor.

      I bet he is the type that would want his mind uploaded and that entity to be given all the wealth.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/elon-musk-buying-intel-could-be-poor-outcome-says-citi-1034241743

    This is the only reputable outlet that had anything to say about it.

    They reference SemiAccurate as the source, which I have not heard of before, but seems to have a solid track record with accurate reporting.


    GET. FUCKED. MUSK.

    I have to say, having an all-AMD setup makes me feel slightly okay today, even though AMD is just another shit company. At least it’s not in the running to be owned by that fucking tool.

    • philpo@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      The problem is not your own setup - the fact that Intel is still huge in the server market (and very likely will be for a long time as AMD still is not up to their level in some applications) is the concerning issue.

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    On one hand “noooo!” But on the other this would be great for ARM and RISC-v if Intel tanks.

    • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Hooray for Risc-v, anyway.

      I think I joke too often about ruling benevolently over the world’s robots someday after everyone lays off their Cybersecurity staff.

      But if we continue this trend, this community may have the only clean secure laptops after everyone else sells out and fills their shit with backdoors.

      Maybe we can rule together as a benevolent collective…

    • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Screw ARM honestly, they don’t need any help. RISC-V though as the only open source of any significance, absolutely!

      • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        What about POWER9? You can buy a complete workstation right now, with an open source CPU, Board, BIOS. It’ll cost you an arm, a leg, and probably some more internal organs, but it is currently more functional than RISC-V.

          • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            I mean, you probably heard of PowerPC. IBM kept working on that, is still working on it. They’re at Power10 now, but that has some proprietary blobs, as opposed to POWER9.

            I’d say that it’s mainly cool because it’s an architecture with enough performance for modern stuff, that is completely open source. No proprietary BIOS, no Management Engine running unknown code. Also, pretty stable, supposedly.

            Only supported by Linux, some BSDs, and some proprietary IBM *nixes, if you wanna say you have a system that literally can’t run Windows.

            If you want fun facts, the currently 9th powerful supercomputer, Summit, runs on it, I guess.

            The hardware is too expensive for pretty much anyone to actually wanna use it, but oh well, what do you do.

            You can get yourself a workstation for about $10k here. https://www.raptorcs.com/content/TL2WK2/intro.html

      • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah.

        And there’s a very good chance that Elon spends his waning years in and out of every court, trying to stay out of jail.

        Source: Rockefeller’s biography.

        And that’s actually the optimistic version, from Elon’s perspective. There’s been plenty of rich assholes in history that didn’t have to worry about the courts.

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Not doing to happen in this political climate. The robber barons has nothing in the tech companies.

        • TheFogan@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I mean really depends whether or not he manages to continue to succesfully own the US government. He made basically statements along the lines of if trump loses the election he could go to jail. I assume he’s betting on either the trump administration killing democracy… or being able to buy the next election too. Or perhaps just often enough that the supreme court never gets fixed.

          • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Yeah. Rockefeller pretty much owned the government in his heyday, too.

            And then at some point he didn’t anymore. Money can buy power, but it does run out eventually.

            Rockefeller was a lot smarter than Musk, and got a bit ahead of it with publicity stunt donations, before his influence ran out.

            Musk thinks he can achieve a better outcome by controlling the media or the courts.

            I think it’s objectively true that controlling the media does work, but I also think Musk wildly overestimates his own competence, and is in for a worse time than Rockefeller had.

    • Venator@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      He hasn’t bought it yet, maybe everyone else will stay buying Intel stocks after this news and it’ll get too expensive for him.

  • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Look at the way Tesla collects and treats customer data, and the way Musk seems to unilaterally abuse the control over the companies he owns for personal reasons.

    Now think about the capabilities of the Intel Management Engine that pretty much every Intel CPU requires.

    Bad vibes, I say.

    For those feeling out of the loop, see here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Management_Engine

    Tldr - it’s a little always on processor, running a Minix OS, with direct access to all board devices including the Ethernet Controller.

    AMD has something similar in form of their Platform Security Processor.

  • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Lmfao oh man because AMD wasn’t encroaching enough on intels market share, make your brand even more political than it already is. Hitching their trailer to a beneficiary of apartheid is notoriously on brand for them though, so there’s that.

  • Soulifix@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Because that he’s the richest known man in the world, we’re going to see this asshole’s name crop up a lot as a potential buyer.

    Why can’t he just go fucking buy Facebook or something?

    • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I worked at intel for a while. It deserves to be destroyed. But I live in an area with a lot of well off intel employees. It could tank my house value among other major impacts to the community. Like I am sure he would kill the matching donation stuff which would be a significant reduction of the amount of money non profits get in this area. So I hope the destruction is slow enough for other chip companies in the area to absord some of the workers.

  • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Everyone is focusing on Musk but uh, Global Foundries wants to be involved in buying Intel?

    The same Global Foundries that’s utterly incapable of progressing their tech stack?

    The one AMD created when they got rid of their foundries and was happy to do so?

    That amuses the shit out of me.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      AMD wasn’t quite “happy” to sell their fabs, it was necessitated because they were facing bankruptcy. People forget but the prevailing opinion was that AMD was going to bankrupt.

      I doubt Global Foundries is even in the position to buy Intel, they’d most likely want to give them a cash infusion in exchange for tech or for selling fabs (which intel would probably accept, since their fabs are currently under-utilised… they have too much capacity). That would be good for GF.