octopus_ink@lemmy.mlcake to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 days ago"Free" Speech Absolutist™lemmy.mlimagemessage-square90fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1image"Free" Speech Absolutist™lemmy.mloctopus_ink@lemmy.mlcake to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 days agomessage-square90fedilink
minus-squareoctopus_ink@lemmy.mlcakeOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-29 days agoBut then do you ignore that research when the result is different than you expected? Like this one? https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/oct/22/twitter-admits-bias-in-algorithm-for-rightwing-politicians-and-news-outlets Or will you not claim exactly the opposite of what the article you provided shows when the topic comes up the next time around?
But then do you ignore that research when the result is different than you expected? Like this one?
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/oct/22/twitter-admits-bias-in-algorithm-for-rightwing-politicians-and-news-outlets
Or will you not claim exactly the opposite of what the article you provided shows when the topic comes up the next time around?