hey nerds, I’m getting myself a new personal laptop as a treat, but I very much do not want windows 11 shitting it up. Is there a linux distro with caveman-compatible instructions for installation and use? I want to think about my OS as little as possible while actually using it.

I’ve got one friend who uses mint, but I’ve also seen memes dunking on it so who knows. I actually really only know what I’ve seen from you all shitposting in other communities

  • sping@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s hilarious how uncool it is to suggest Ubuntu but it often just works, including very recent hardware if it’s from Canonical partners like Lenovo or Dell. And the kerfuffle about things like snaps are way overblown.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      More specifically Ubuntu LTS, since interim releases are now expectedly beta quality and require upgrades a few months after release. Ubuntu LTS, enable unattended upgrades, register and activate Ubuntu Pro for them and you won’t have to touch it for the lifetime of the hardware.

    • bjorney@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Especially because it’s to a newbie, who stands to benefit the most from using an OS with more user share and more available online resources.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Fedora tends to “just work” too. Some manufacturers that support Ubuntu also support Fedora for customers that need a “RedHat-ish” distro instead of a “Debian-ish” one.

    • mac@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I came here to say this as well. Ubuntu “just works”™ and was my entry into linux 15+ years ago.

      • leadore@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Ubuntu was my entry to linux as well, 19 years ago. But Ubuntu of today is not the Ubuntu of 15-19 years ago, not in a good way.

    • beleza pura@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      you’re right, but the issues with ubuntu crop up later, when you have to update or after you install enough incompatible stuff that it breaks your system. which is a shame bc ubuntu is the most user friendly distro there is imo

        • sping@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Is it though? I’ve found it rock solid for years on end - been using it for 14 years, and Debian before that.

          • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            i mean idk, i was just asking about what that other poster was saying. i fuckin’ hate ubuntu for other reasons and i generally don’t speak on it in the negative or positive in threads like this. i only chimed in because what was being said struck me as odd. “it’s the most user friendly distro there is, it just breaks a lot”

            it made me wonder what user friendly meant to this other user. i wanted to hear their perspective because i thought i could learn something, especially as i help my mom, an inexperienced linux user, use linux on an old laptop for the first time

      • sping@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I don’t recognize this myself. I’ve never had trouble with incompatibilities or degradation etc.,

        Especially these days my OS can remain very vanilla, as many complex things can be containerized. E.g. I run syncthing and an nfs server and sometimes torrenting over vpn, through docker-compose; I’d never install all that on the host with all the extensive dependencies. Same with some heavyweight apps like darktable - spin them up from Flatpak.

        Ubuntu does it very well with minimal fuss. I see little to dislike.

        • beleza pura@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          my last personal anectode with ubuntu is this: my company decided to setup our office as a remote-onsite hybrid workplace, so our working machines were moved to a rack elsewhere to be accessed remotely and the local machines were supposed to act as basically dumb terminals that can be used interchangeably by us

          we develop on rhel, but since the local machines are just to access our dev machines remotely, support decided to install ubuntu because it “just works”. turns out, since ubuntu does a lot of stuff its own way for no good reason, it broke under our network configuration (it’s complicated) and no snap application could run – so, no slack or firefox. not a great scenario for a workplace. in the end we decided to replace ubuntu by rhel and no longer had any issues

          you’re right that ubuntu might work flawlessly for you and that it might never break. but, it also might break in unexpected ways. i cannot reliably recommend ubuntu to a beginner because this risk might forever put someone off of linux

  • rodbiren@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve done dozens of distros and Linux mint is the most familiar, unexciting, and stable one I have found. Ignore the hate. Real Linux fans don’t care how you participate in open source, other than being toxic. Consequently, do whatever you want and install whatever seems like it would be something you’d want to use.

    Id highly suggest having a separate hard drive for Linux as it can be easy to break dual boot if you don’t know what you are doing. Last thing you want to do is panic and decide you need to reinstall Windows.

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    When first coming from Windows, starting with Mint is the safest bet for a good transition because things will work pretty much as you expect them to, and there’s a very helpful forum if you have any questions. But I always say to try several distros and Desktop Environments to see how you like them. Everyone is different and it’s all a matter of preference.

    I suggest that once you’ve got whatever distro you decided on up and running, install a virtual machine software such as Boxes (very simple) or Virtual Box (a little more complicated but with more options). Then just download various distros and make VMs for them to try them out easily. Have fun!

  • glans [it/its]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    mint

    • generally a solid choice

    • you have a friend who uses it! big advantage

    people who make memes about linux distros are in a lot deeper than you want to be. they have different goals.

  • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    mint is probably where you want to be. if you have performance issues with mint, consider MX Linux, AntiX, and EndeavourOS, in that order.

  • punchmesan@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    You got a lot of distro recommendations from across the spectrum and it’s honestly hats to go wrong with any of them. It’s mostly a matter of preference. As such I’ll give you two pieces of advice:

    1. Set up a multi-boot flash drive (assuming you’re currently using Windows, YUMI is a great utility) so that your can try a bunch of them and see what jives with you most. A great feature of Linux installers of that you can actually run the entire OS, full-featured, from the ISO. So grab a whole slew of them, throw them on the flash drive, and spend some time taking them for a spin.
    2. Do your research on compatibility. Laptop makers often don’t make Linux drivers, so the latest hardware has compatibility problems until the community covers the gap. There are also some laptop manufacturers that have Linux in mind when they make their products, like System 76 and Framework.

    Good luck! IMO getting into Linux for the first time is a fun journey. Enjoy it!

  • Norin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve been using Mint and Pop!_OS on two different machines for a few years.

    Neither has really required much from me as the user, although I have needed to use the terminal once on each of them.

    Personally, I really like the way Pop does window tiling and workspaces.

    • HipsterTenZero@dormi.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Still shopping around, so nothing’s set in stone. I’m not much of a hardware guy either, so the best I could tell you is just that I’m looking for something a step or two above ‘bare minimum’ for 2025. An SSD, fair bit of ram, ports for external storage so I can actually boot with another OS, maybe enough guts to run skyrim modded to the gills. Somewhere in that ballpark.

  • Fashim@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Personally I would recommend Fedora, most distros people have recommended here works.

    I had less issues installing Fedora on a new laptop than I did with the win11 and win10 attempts, I’m never switching back to windows

  • Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    The process for installation is more or less the same for all of them.

    Linux Mint and PopOS are the “go to” suggestions. I really don’t like the way either of them look. I’m partial to GNOME for aesthetics and ease of use.

    Bazzite comes with most of the stuff you will want pre-loaded, and also the cool Steam Deck Gamescope interface. It’s the only one I’ve used with seamless background updates like you might be accustomed to on Android or iOS. That’s my recommendation.

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m partial to GNOME for aesthetics and ease of use.

      At that point just get a Mac. Gnome has the same “we know better than you do. If you want to do something outside of our extremely specific use cases, you’re using it wrong and should figure something else out” mentality that Apple does.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        At that point just get a Mac.

        There are lots and lots of reasons not to do that that in sure you already know but are determined to be an asshole regardless.

        Gnome has the same “we know better than you do

        Never seen it.

      • merci3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Except on Linux you’re not obligated to use GNOME, with it being simply a choice between many, and that just so happens to fit into it’s users specific needs. It sure has it’s issue like any DE has, and if it bothers you then you’re completely free to use whatever else you want, that’s the beauty of open source.

    • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Currently using Bazzite as my main OS on my laptop, and it works pretty good, the ostree setup has prevented me from manually installing several things though :/

  • Noble Bacon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    Português
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is quite a rabbit hole you are getting yourself into, but to keep it short and relatively simple, you need to figure out something very important beforehand:

    • Do you want a rolling release or a stable distro?

    I’m assuming that, you are not yet familiar with these terms, so let’s go with the stable distros.

    You have a lot of options here, most of them will all be based of Ubuntu, which is based in Debian, so let me drop a few generally good suggestions in no particular order:

    • Linux Mint
    • MX Linux
    • ZorinOS
    • PopOS
    • Fedora, (This one is not a stable distro, but you should be good with it)

    Either of these is a good starting point. If down the road you feel like they stop fitting your needs, start exploring the big three, (Debian, Fedora and Arch Linux).

  • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Debian all day…

    All these shiny new distros promising to make things easier and better… But nothing is easier and better than 30 years of rock solid stability and support.

    Depending on how new the laptop is, it might not work on debian stable. Check your compatibility

    From personal experience with a new laptop, the intel meteor lake platform didnt work well with debian stable

  • smiletolerantly@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Generally I agree with everyone else, Linux Mint is great.

    However, if you really want to not worry at all, you could just buy a laptop from e.g. Tuxedo or System76. They come with Linux preinstalled (I think in the case of Tuxedo at least, you even have a choice of which Linux Distro?), and are guaranteed to have no hardware “difficulties” with Linux, i.e. even if you put another distro on it, you won’t encounter driver issues.

    (Those have become very rare anyways, but do put a damper on the “Firsttime Linux Experience” if you do encounter them…)

    • Lotsen@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      You can also buy from novacustoms and get Linux installed and you get to have coreboot as the bios