• andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Also what’s the goal of scrambling jets when the threat is a passenger inside said jet? Are they gonna ask the pilot to pipe the radio to the PA and say “you better not blow up that plane because we’re in charge and we said so?” Do they have a sniper on the wing ready to take out just one guy meanwhile depressurizing the whole fuselage, potentially explosively? Maybe Top Gun Tom Cruise can hit the guy with a burst of the 20mm? Seems like there’s no point whatsoever. Best case they can say “yep it blew up” or “nope it didn’t blow up.”

    • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I mean, were there actually a terrorist onboard the plane, I imagine the logic would be “If they hijack it and decide to try to crash it into something 9/11 style, a fighter can at least blow it up in time to prevent more casualties on the ground”

    • Chozo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      They’d shoot the plane down if they can’t get the pilot to land safely. They’d rather one plane full of innocent passengers gets killed than a plane full of innocent passengers and a building full of even more innocents.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      The jets are to shoot down the airliner if it aims towards a dense area, sensitive location, etc.