A federal judge on Wednesday temporarily blocked a California law that would have banned carrying firearms in most public places, ruling that it violates the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and deprives people of their ability to defend themselves and their loved ones.

The law signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom in September was set to take effect Jan. 1. It would have prohibited people from carrying concealed guns in 26 places including public parks and playgrounds, churches, banks and zoos. The ban would apply whether the person has a permit to carry a concealed weapon or not. One exception would be for privately owned businesses that put up signs saying people are allowed to bring guns on their premises.

  • CthulhuOnIce@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    i like guns but don’t a bunch of other states have bans like this? how could it be unconstitutional in Cali but not in the other states that have had laws like this for years

    • FireTower@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      1 year ago

      The CA law went further than other states. It for example it included most places as sensitive places (including random things like gas stations that sell lottery tickets) and required businesses to post a sign to allow people to carry on their premises.

      • swiftcasty@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        In the list of the top ten most likely places for violent crime to occur in the US, gas stations and convenience stores are 3rd or 4th depending on the year. Not so random.

        • Fal@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          That violence is not from people who are legally carrying guns

    • theyoyomaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, a few states passed this in response to Bruen. All of them have been challenged but this is the first to get a ruling.