• PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    237
    ·
    9 months ago

    The ebike subreddit is modded by the owners of Lunacycle. They actively remove posts about bad customer service/other issues from Lunacycle. I witnessed them name and shame some random redditor and accuse them of fraud because they posted screenshots of email correspondence that pointed out shady dealings on Luna’s part.

    They use the general subreddit for electric bikes to funnel everyone into ordering from them.

    • gregorum@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      167
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      during the massive purge of rebellious mods, there was a huge opening for corporate shills to move into places where previous mods had kept them out. this phenomenon was widespread in many fan and specialty subs. Reddit admins were more than happy to let this happen, as corporate shills were also more than happy to be cooperative with Reddit admins.

      • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        92
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Everything about Reddit’s most recent changes has been openly about cracking the place wide open for corporate marketing. Everything good about it was because of how genuine it was, and it was genuine because for a very long time, the attitude was to shield it against corporate influence.

        That’s the only reason it became such a valuable place for search results: as the forums and blogs around the Internet went silent and corporations ravaged individual websites, reddit was a bubble of genuine interaction. It’s not just Google’s shitty algorithm, it’s also because the Internet itself got injected with shit, and reddit was a safe haven. A deeply flawed one, but still, notably less fake and corporate than the web pages around it.

        That’s what gave it value.

        Spez knows this. The admins have known this the whole damn time. That’s why there used to be rules against self-posting content. That’s why celebrities were only allowed to promote things in AMAS. To head off attention seeking, marketing, and corporate influence.

        But the time came to make money, and they’re burning it all down to accomplish that.

        I will never not share this blog because it hits the nail so cleanly on the head it sails straight down to the core of the earth:

        Stop talking to each other and start buying things

        It’s not just about ads, it’s about the corruption of public spaces. The death of social media is when someone tries to start making money off it at the expense of its genuine human interaction, which can not exist in that environment unmolested, and will cascade into the platform’s collapse over time. it’s enshitification, yes, but it’s also something else: “dehumanation”. The drowning of the human element of your social platform through profit seeking.

        • czardestructo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’ve been through too many exodus, this post hits hard and true. Been using the net since 95 and have been a community refuge too many times. I’m really hoping federation takes off because I’m tired of rebuilding. Not sure I’ll try again if this doesn’t pan out.

          • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Hate to break it to you but it will likely happen again. Meta is already encroaching on our new corner of the web, they’ll either eat it or it’ll die out on its own as funding doesn’t really exist here

    • GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 months ago

      In a similar more minor vein, the Snowpeircer (tv show) sub was administered by the showrunners.
      They were mostly subtle about it, but quietly removed lots of posts after a week or so that didn’t fit show promo.
      I’m pretty sure they’ve abandoned it now that the show is in limbo.

  • ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    159
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Is all bad online behavior “trolling” now? Isn’t “shill” a better word for someone who is paid to surreptitiously promote something?

    • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      73
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Back in my day trolling meant something. It meant you cared enough to actually form a real argument that withstands scrutiny, just to setup for the rug pull. The better your polemic, the more engagement as people debated if you were for real or not.

      Shitposting controversial hot takes or dog whistle memes is mid af, do better

      • MIDItheKID@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        From my understanding trolling meant exactly what it says it is: Trolling. I think people for some reason get this mixed up with trolls - as in the fantasy type monster. But I think it actually has to do with the fishing termtrolling where you cast out your line, and see if you can get somebody to take the bait. Once they take the bait, you take em for a ride.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Actually, that’s also where the name of the mythical creature comes from. They’d set up bridges that offer convenient shortcuts as bait for humans

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          From my understanding trolling meant exactly what it says it is: Trolling. I think people for some reason get this mixed up with trolls - as in the fantasy type monster. But I think it actually has to do with the fishing termtrolling where you cast out your line, and see if you can get somebody to take the bait. Once they take the bait, you take em for a ride.

          When the word is used on the Internet it’s meant in the fantasy monster way. Specifically it comes from the story of the troll underneath the bridge, interfering with people trying to cross the bridge.

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        polemic

        po·lem·ic /pəˈlemik/ noun a speech or piece of writing expressing a strongly critical attack on or controversial opinion about someone or something. “his polemic against the cultural relativism of the Sixties”

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        You can just add “troll” to the pile of words twisted into meaning “people I don’t like”.

    • paraphrand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 months ago

      No, all bad online behavior now is “bots.”

      At least that’s how people in the comments on lemmy and Reddit label them.

        • paraphrand@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          It seems to correlate with the rise in general awareness of LLMs like ChatGPT. It seems like just the threat/possibility of ChatGPT being used has already distorted discourse online.

        • phillaholic@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I always saw it as someone who only repeats talking points verbatim is essentially a robot. If I can’t tell if you are a human posting, or an automated response is there a meaningful difference?

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        No, all bad online behavior now is “bots.”

        At least that’s how people in the comments on lemmy and Reddit label them.

        I, and others, have distinguish between shills and bots.

        Usually people use shilling as an alternative to astroturfing by paid human beings, while bots are just AI/programming posting.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        There’s no way it’s a banned word. /r/neoliberal has a “neoliberal shill of the year” award where they vote for their favorite economist based on social media posts, books released that year, etc.

    • gohixo9650@discuss.tchncs.de
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      it is not “now”. It is exactly as it was being used in 2020, when the article was written, by the mass media. They were calling “troll” everyone they were disagreeing with.

  • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Fellow lemmings, I, for one, am glad that there are no corporate trolls trying to manipulate public opinions on Lemmy, it is the same warm, fuzzy feeling I get when I was watching multiple time Golden Globe nominated summer blockbuster, Barbie, now available on Blu-Ray and select streaming services.

    I don’t know about you, but I sure hope Barbie sweeps the Golden Globes next month (and then the Oscars next year.)

  • Heresy_generator@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Member-only story

    Medium wants me to pay them to read a story from “Homeless Romantic” who is listed as a “Ph.D. Rocket Surgeon & Aspiring Troglodyte”?

    Are they fucking high?

    • TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      It’s been a wonder that site ever got traction as something credible to get info from and not just a weird mesh of editorial, blogging, and long winded shitposts…

      edit: That being said, fuck reddit.

      • Caaaaarrrrlll@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’ve always seen it as a site for random people to shitpost. Who takes Medium seriously as a credible source?

      • OmanMkII@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        For me, it was often a place where a lot of qualified people would essentially write blogs because hosting their own site for it would get utterly ignored by google. The last few years though I’ve got more utter morons than people who can write a good article, even for generic questions that they could straight up copy and paste from another site.

  • Hroderic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    That title is clickbait.

    From the article:

    In 2020, the Computers in Human Behavior study provided additional insights into the tactics employed by corporate trolls on Reddit. The study focused on the top 100 subreddits, analyzing the content posted within these influential communities. The results were alarming, with 15% of the top 100 subreddits found to have content that was likely posted by bots or corporate trolls, specifically aimed at promoting certain companies or organizations.

    That’s 15% of the top 100 subreddits contained some content that was likely posted by bots or corporate trolls.

    https://archive.is/D60ep

  • casual_turtle_stew_enjoyer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s not like one of the six biggest power janitors of Reddit has been caught multiple times wrongfully deleting posts, using bot armies to manipulate votes and accepting money from marketing agencies for “consultancy” in social media guerilla marketing.

    It’s almost like the company doesn’t give a fuck what their unpaid help does to the userbase or content because they still gets investments regardless.

    Fuck spez, fuck GallowBoob, fuck awkwardtheturtle and fuck Sam Altman.

    • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s amazing how quickly the admins came down on some subs after the trench titty drama broke. He was basically reddit’s MrBabyMan. And he’s probably not the only one.

      • casual_turtle_stew_enjoyer@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        He was an angel investor and also onboarded a bunch of celebrity investors.

        I wouldn’t be surprised if they are trying to whitewash this, since it became a minor point of contention a few months ago

        Was also interim CEO for 8 days, to give you an idea of how involved he was. I’ll update with more info and sources later if I have time, otherwise Wayback Machine is your friend

  • miridius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    9 months ago

    The studies are from 2018 and 2020, “new study” in the post title is a complete lie

  • chitak166@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Downvoted for medium article.

    I shouldn’t have to make an account to view news.

    • Kethal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Am I blind? I don’t even see where it names the study. It just says Pew, who publishes many studies. Does medium expect me to search for their sources?

  • lol@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    The results were alarming, with 15% of the top 100 subreddits found to have content that was likely posted by bots or corporate trolls, specifically aimed at promoting certain companies or organizations.

    The study found some (likely) bot/corporate troll content in 15% of the top 100 subreddits. That’s completely different from what the article’s headline claims.

    Edit: Also, the “New Study” as the headline calls it is apparently from 2020.

    (here’s a link to the article without paywall if you want to read it for yourself)

    • MBM@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      The study found some (likely) bot/corporate troll content in 15% of the top 100 subreddits.

      Now I’m surprised it’s that low. Feels like a big part of /r/all is bot posts, with the top comments being from bots too

    • skeezix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I went to the mall because I wished to experience Christmas undignified, to front only the essential facts of capitalism, and see if I could not learn what it had to teach, and not, when I came to New Years, discover that I had not contributed.

    • anticommon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah but we just got 8" of rain and 70 mph winds during a freak December storm that took out half our power grid, how will Amazon-Clause find my house?!? 80 degrees warmer than it should be here and our snowman holding up the mail box melted!!!

  • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    9 months ago

    TBH I’m surprised it’s not higher than that. Even back before the API changes it certainly felt like a lot of front page content was paid for.

    • ManOMorphos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      A lot of the shill marketing is very hard to prove. A lot of the dialogue gets mixed in with commentors that have genuine brand loyalty.

      It’s far too easy for a marketing team to acquire a high karma account and blend in. We’ll never get a truly clear picture of how much Reddit is astroturfed.

    • psud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      This is research from before the API changes. Loads of astroturf efforts were easy to notice, there must have been more subtle ones.

      I always wonder whether the famous post about vacuum cleaners was paid for by the company he recommended. If it was, they got their money’s worth - that redditor was convincing.

  • SoyTDI@eslemmy.es
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    New Study”

    “Two significant studies, the Pew Research Center study conducted in 2018 and the Computers in Human Behavior study published in 2020

    • scottywh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      9 months ago

      So you’re saying it’s almost certainly a significantly larger percentage now.

      Sounds about right.

      • SoyTDI@eslemmy.es
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m just saying that the article is not coherent. If we are at the end of 2023 and it talks about a new article, it doesn’t make sense that it then mentions two articles, one from 2018 and another from 2020.

        • Usernamemonopoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          You also have to see the irony in an article that forces new user signup to read it in its entirety. The internet is just gross now. Almost everything is corporate garbage or some site or individual trying to establish a “user base” or “followers” etc. I’m mostly just tired of it all. We’ve had radio, tv and now the internet. I’m personally just hoping to be around for the next thing to come along so I can enjoy it before the same cycle hits it and fucking ruins it.

  • kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    And another 50% is trolls working probono to be try and convince people that racism is the only way forward

    • z00s@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      You can assume they’re everywhere but at least Lemmy is still a small enough target for now that it’s not completely enshittened (yet)

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Lemmy probably isn’t big enough for the ad bots to be worth it yet. Lemmy is more infested with right wing astroturf shills pretending to be leftists and pushing “both sides” nonsense.

    • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      What are you talking about? We’re not active on Lemmy. We don’t even have time to be here, we’re too busy enjoying a refreshing Starry

    • Troy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Too small. We only have users with individual agendas still.

      May I talk to you about my lord and saviour, Gandalf?