What happens when a school bans smartphones? A complete transformation | US education | The Guardian::Teachers say mobile phones make their lives a living hell – so one Massachusetts school barred them

  • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Crazy how people otherwise firm supporters of freedom of speech and freedom of tech suddenly change their minds when the person involved is under 18.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Are you unfamiliar with the principal that things which are appropriate for adults are often not appropriate for children?

      • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        According to the United States, it’s appropriate to imprison children for delinquency that is things that are criminal for children that are not criminal for adults.

        So no, I have little faith regarding what my society decides is right for kids.

          • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            The notion that some things may be inappropriate for kids is easly misused when it’s turned into a principle and as such we end up where the US is now, withholding civil rights from children and using child safety to push identity politics.

            I do hope you are not a parent.

            • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              I hope you aren’t either. You probably try to make everything into a political diatribe.

              Actually, I hope you don’t have kids, because you are clearly not a parent, regardless of whether you’ve been able to spawn.

              • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 months ago

                I’m not a parent, a point that has informed my relationship with my stepdaughters and grandson. When we lived in the same household, they still had their respective dads, for better or worse, and I couldn’t replace them. As a friendly adult, my role was to affirm to my wife’s kids that their feelings are valid even when they couldn’t express them with the sturm und drang they warranted.

                Of what I’ve seen of parents, including my own, their jobs commonly leave them far to exhausted to actually parent (or run a household, or relax, or engage in their civic responsibilities). Industry has long driven society to intergenerational mental illness, and kids are often having to confront adult situations early.

                But yes, events and policy in Florida and Texas have shown us that it is en vogue in places to withhold information from children, not so much to protect them, but to keep them from questioning the values of their parents, teachers, ministers and officers who direct them. Efforts to obstruct access to porn turn quickly into efforts to obstruct access to health information, to LGBT+ content, to the darker chapters of US and western history, to alternatives to capitalism, to even the beatitudes.

                To be fair, Moms For Liberty and the adults making scenes at PTSA (PTA?) meetings don’t represent all parents, and I actually kinda hope they aren’t parents (or as you noted, progenitors) themselves. But we naked apes don’t typically choose to breed for the benefit of our spawn, but because we want the cute thing, not thinking about the outraged, frustrated teen they will grow into, or the struggling, beleaguered adult struggling to fit into a society that wants to use and discard them like an expendable mechanical part.

                Kids don’t know the difference between ignorance and innocence. That is a projection placed onto them by society, and I think kids should have the same access to information on the clitoris or plantation economics or communism or Sappho of Lesbos as they do Alexander Hamilton, the steam engine, Christopher Columbus and Washington Irving.

                • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  I never said anything about restricting access to information. We’re talking about banning phones from classrooms, which I see as no different from not letting kids drive cars.

      • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m familiar with the sad fact that many people believe that. Knowledge should never be age restricted. If a kid doesn’t want to learn about, for example, sex, and finds it gross, that’s one thing. An entire society conspiring to keep them from knowing about it till they’re about 11 is quite another.

        • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yes, that’s why I’m completing fine with my kids watching online videos of ISIS prisoners being burnt to death in a dog cage.

          Can I ask if you have kids?

          • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Given how responsibility for much of the violence in the world falls at the feet of the society that is deciding how to censor information from our kids, I find it quite appropriate that they have access to terrorist executions and cat killing videos.

            The US gives few fucks that such videos exist, or that our society was built on massacres and slavery. We just don’t want our kids to know the grim legacy that they’ve been given.

            Considering kids today are going to be middle aged when the climate crisis catches up to us, it raises questions of ethics what people were doing having kids in the first place.

        • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          How about restricting children from driving cars?

          A phone is a tool, not knowledge. Kids can find all the knowledge they want without having phones on them at all times.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Students, faculty and guests grab their food from the kitchen, and eat together under a white tent that overlooks western Massachusetts’ Berkshire mountains.

    As the close of the school year neared last June, talk turned to final assignments (the English class was finishing Moby-Dick) and end-of-year fun (there was a trip planned to a local lake).

    The devices can make calls, send texts (slowly) and can’t load modern applications; instead coming with deliberately cumbersome versions of music and mapping apps.

    When a middle school in Canada surveyed staff, 75% of respondents thought that cellphones were negatively affecting their students’ physical and mental health.

    Providing dumb phones could be part of the way forward, Nina Marks admits, but she wonders if funds at already strapped public schools could be put to better use.

    While Hollier says that Light Phones are intentionally small and slow, so that people use them less, students report that they also break easily and the batteries die quickly, which wasn’t in the plan.


    The original article contains 1,688 words, the summary contains 166 words. Saved 90%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I watched the first generation that got personal unrestricted mobile phones for themselves. Somehow I thought it was a good idea at the time. It fucked them up mentally, and then Covid-19 came and doubled the effect.

    Now I think that a parent who gets their under 12 year old kid a smart phone should be treated roughly in the same way as if the parent gave the kid cocaine.

    • SmashingSquid@notyour.rodeo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      We got an iPhone for my niece who is 8. It’s locked down so all she can do is text, call, and take pictures/video and she can’t contact anyone not in her contacts list. She has some games but can’t use them for more than an hour per day and they won’t open during school hours.

      A big issue is parents not bothering to learn how to use and set up parental controls.

      • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Controls like these don’t work if the kid is smart, determined or the parents are too tired or uninvolved. There’s more to the cellphone issue than the actual cellphone.

        • erwan@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          It doesn’t matter if the kid is smart and determined, parental controls can’t be circumvented.

          Unless the parent is stupid enough to leave their phones unlocked or lax enough to unblock the phone every time the kid asks for it.

    • Hexarei@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I lent my 8yo my old phone, heavily restricted and with Family Link installed; She’s only allowed 2 hours a day and isn’t allowed on stuff like YouTube. There are ways to do it responsibly.

      • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        There are a few things to consider.

        1. She’s just 8, so you have an easier time controlling what she does

        2. She might not be susceptible to these things

        3. You just might be a better parent for any arbitrary reason

        So as an anecdote your situation is valuable, but as a guideline to how the whole society should handle this problem possibly not so much.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    For enclosed schools, it surprises me they don’t just faraday cage all the rooms, and then run school-controlled wifi.

    But in my day, teachers freaked out about electronic calculators and word processors. I’d think the appropriate thing to do is integrate smart-phone use into curricula. If your kids are texting, then your teaching model sucks.

    But here in the states, we already know our teaching model sucks, because the state doesn’t take it seriously and gives zero fucks about kids until they can be loaded with debt and can serve as a laborer or soldier for billionaire vanity projects.

    • BoneALisa@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I sure you arent being serious, but farday caging the rooms would likely be highly illegal, blocking emergency cell calls and other emergency signals (like radio and gps) is a big ol no no.

  • super_user_do@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Today my computer science teacher asked a friend of mine to show his screentime statistics as a joke. Bro literally spent an average of +11h A DAY on his phone…

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I was curious so I looked at mine, it isn’t accurate, it says 10 hours 22 minutes average, but it says 7 of that is gaming, there’s no way i spend 7 hours of gaming, maybe an hour max a day because the only game I play is ants fallen kingdom which doesn’t require much active tike, just enough time to do dailies so 45 mins? , I’m on social media a hell of a lot more then gaming but my social is only at roughly 2 hours. I don’t think you can rely on it lol

    • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Smartphones and apps are scientifically designed to be addictive. The same techniques that make people spend hours at slot machines goes into modern games.

    • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Jesus. I’m at just above two hours for my weekly average. It used to be 8-10 hours daily when I had a job where I had to leave my house, go into an office, and not do any work. Now that I do the same thing but from home, I don’t need to use my phone as much.

  • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Don’t all schools ban phones? They were banned when I was in highschool maybe ten years ago. And smartphones were already very much a thing by that point. Everyone still used them because enforcement was basically impossible.

    The only teacher I ever saw who had an effective strategy was my math teacher. He told kids to put their phones on their desk at the beginning of class so that they were out in the open. If he found out you had come to class with a phone and didn’t put it on the desk, you’d lose it, even if you weren’t using it. And then he said you could use them for a few seconds to check them, but you had to keep them out in the open. No hiding the phone by your legs.

    • simple@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Definitely depends on the school and where you live, but in my experience the rules have become really loose. Every kid has a phone and mobile data. They’re banned in class but kids always try to open their phones to check them and hide them quickly anyways. Many kids spend breaks on their phone. Banning kids from coming into school with phones in their first place is what the article means.

    • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      “Back in my day” (when phones were not that smart but already had color screens and crappy cameras) the teacher would seize your phone if you dared to take it out of your pocket or if it even did as much as vibrate. Not sure why kids would need to check their phone during class nowadays.

      • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Because the way we detect and curb abusive teachers is the same way we do abusive police officers, by recording their actions and posting them online.

        Back in my day abusive teachers just did their damage, and left my generation with scars. Without publicly-accessible evidence of these events, and consequential pressure on the state, the process just continues.

        And then your society teams with intergenerational mental illness, such as what I’m diagnosed with.

      • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s how most teachers in my school operated, and it meant people were constantly screwing around on their phones and not paying attention, because it was an unenforceable policy. Like I said, the only teacher I ever had who effectively prevented people from screwing around on their phones excessively was that math teacher.

        • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Was very enforceable at our school. Teachers had eagle eyes, they simply took your phone and if you were lucky they gave it back to you after class, but most of the time you had to come pick it up after school, and if you were a multi-time offender, your parents had to come get it.

      • TheFriar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think we’re from the same day. I’m pretty goddamn glad, honestly. I’ve seen how much the phone has invaded my life, and I’m on the lowest scale of intrusion. I typically find myself out with a group of people all on their phones. It feels weird and gross. I could see how that constant attachment could be such a problem for teachers today, even if they were banned. It’s almost automatic, when someone gets bored or distracted, their hand is already in their pocket pulling out the phone.

        We had texting, but the smart phone was invented the year I graduated high school. So really even my college years weren’t really tainted by constant phone use. We were really lucky for that reason, I hink.

    • bluewing@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      My local school has a simple system. Every student is required to place their phones in a clear plastic similar to this - []https://www.amazon.com/Gorilla-Grip-Breathable-Organizer-Accessories/dp/B09MJH9V2V/ref=sr_1_6?crid=1X4FP5L6YX60T&keywords=hanging%2Bshoe%2Bcaddy&sprefix=hanging%2Bshoe%2Bcaddy%2Caps%2C239&sr=8-6&th=1 - hanging right next to the door. The pockets are transparent so the teacher can quickly see if everyone has done so and they are cheap.

      • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Terrible. Imagine how many poo and cum particles live on that nasty-ass thing.

          • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Ewwwww dude imagine how many phones are in there every day of the week.

            Trust me, NOBODY would wanna touch my phone. And I’m pretty clean.

            Now multiply that by… a lot. And also it’s teens. They don’t tend to have the best hand-washing-after-touching-gross-things record. I only did because I had parents in the medical community. My friends were disgusting. They still are. I love them anyway. I don’t want my phone touching stranger poocum

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      When I was in school, just pulling out a phone meant confiscation.
      Even ringing meant a call for the parents to get it back.

  • sndrtj@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Official government recommendation for Dutch school is to ban smartphones in class. For now it’s just an advice, but it may become law in the future.

  • Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Personally I went to school before smartphones were a thing and it was still miserable lmao

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Anyone and everyone can benefit from putting away their smartphone, not just students.

    Off topic, but when were the photos of these students taken? Their clothing and hair looks like they came straight out of the 90s. Even some of the photos themselves looks “film-like”.

  • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    You actually hit it right in the nail. What actually works is talking to them like thinking, rational human beings, explain the situation and then be a mature adult and understand that they will have to make their own choices and there is nothing you can do about it.

    Ideally we should be teaching self-control instead of submission and evasion. A lot of what’s going on in the world stems from this tendency.