• solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    wow. kudos for being the “now that it’s too late to have an impact, i’m going to do the thing i should have done many months ago” president

    • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      At the start of the invasion Russia was claiming they finally had hypersonic nuclear missles. Meaning they could get nukes past defense systems. That is the reason the US was hesitant to let things escalate.

      Since then we’ve found out that Russias hypersonic missles had some misfires and still didn’t have the ability to steer at hypersonic speeds if I remember right.

      That plus the fact that Trump is months away from helping Russia changes the strategy.

          • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            you’re right. i’m just salty because we live in a fascist dictatorship now

            we’re basically russia. could biden have even done anything? i don’t even know

            • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Not exactly russia.

              I know 2nd trump term is terrifying, I’m not denying that this will be worse than his first term, but the difference is that the US has the separation of powers between the states and the federal government. The check and balance within the federal government is gone, but we still have this final line of defence, that is federalism. States can resist tyranny of the federal government, if they have the willingness to do so. Remember, that states run elections, swing states do not all have a republican trifecta. And even in republican trifecta states, there is still the state judiciary, and we might still have some of those non-magas republicans like Raffensperger.

              The election in 2026 will likely be less free and fair than 2024, but with a large enough democratic margin of victory, democrats can still take back the house, maybe senate.

              Maybe I’m in denial, but I consider this view to be optimism. I thought people like Raffensperger would just cave in and do whatever trump wanted but they didn’t.

              Don’t give up hope. We’ll soon see if federalism really works, if states would find the will to resist a tyrannical federal government.

              • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                Time for those 2A proponents to step up… oh.

                No, I think your message is spot on. We’ll weather Trump, if a bit worse for the wear. We survived a literal civil war, we’ll survive him.

                • Crismus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  The 2A solution is when there’s no hope of peace. You really don’t want them to remove the last option.

                  The 1st is so people can talk and work through differences. When he only thing left is to use the 2nd, nothing will put the Republic back together the same way.

                  If Congress, Supreme Court, or the Executive find a way to close the 2nd Amendment down. Then there’s no way for the people to fight against complete Tyranny when the time comes.

                  Home-grown insurgencies nearly always win. The US has never been able to win against them, just like Israel can’t win against Palestine. Insurgencies can only be negotiated with and always stop once freedom or rights are acknowledged.

              • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                how do you organize with people who refuse to consider anything other than “maybe it won’t be that bad” or worse?

                if you have a network of people who you trust and are actually willing to take some kind of action beyond “oh well i guess this is life now,” then i’m officially jealous

                • Arbiter@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Well, a network of likeminded people won’t just find you. It’s something you’ve gotta seek out.

                  Look for local non-profits and political groups that advocate for the positions you care about and get involved.

                • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Imagine being so completely neutered as a proletariat that your idea of emergency grassroots organizing is geared towards expanding nato

                  patriotic socialism is literally nazism

                • UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Also people can’t afford to miss a day of work and their employers are just waiting to fire them in support of their false God.

              • Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Have you seen what Russia does to people who organize? You get vanned lol

                I’m half expecting that to become reality in America

      • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Plus who knows, 😜, maybe I don’t have to work tomorrow!

        I mean, if I was mangled into 30753 pieces mixed in with the neighbors dog and Misses Jane’s tits on someone’s windshield which is also in 1000 pieces and on fire tomorrow, then I don’t have to go work.

        But all good 👍 if we can possibly get sadam putin in a bag and toss him into the ocean with honors. Or just in to a bag. Tomorrow or this coming week would be a good time for that.

  • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    He’s supposed to be calming shit down before Trump takes office, not setting the stage for WW3. Fucking maniac

    • nexguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, Biden need to set the stage for Trump to try to force Ukraine into surrendering its land to a murderous dictator so that the dictator can further his plans to take more land later gah.

    • Noxy@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      “calm” would be Ukraine no longer being invaded and occupied. Working towards that end is arguably a more effective way to calm shit down.

        • Noxy@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          You don’t think we’re headed there anyways from climate change, pollution, deforestation, or any of the other shit that’s already causing ecosystems to collapse and entire species to go extinct?

              • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                Fortunately we have scientists who are smarter than you who have published studies showing it does

                • Noxy@yiffit.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Well I probably won’t survive either and it sure as shit feels like I can’t stop either so I not gonna get too worried about it

        • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Totally unrelated but as I’m reading this thread I’m listening to an audiobook and one of the characters said “End of all life on this planet” at practically the same time I read your comment.

            • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Eruption. Apparently Michael Crichton had a pet-project he was working on and his widow found an author to finish it…James Patterson.

              I never read any James Patterson, but it does have a feel like a lot of Michael Crichton books I loved like Jurassic Park or Andromeda Strain…building up “how the hell could we let this happen” with entirely plausible scenarios and science with only enough fantasy to make it work.

  • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m seeing a lot of comments taking this literally or saying why didn’t he do this before –

    You all realise this is a very powerful symbolic gesture, right? This is a diplomatic move, not a literal one. The president of the US would never strike at this time in this kind of proxy war, and this is the closest ‘fuck you’ he can issue at Russia (which, again, would not be said aloud).

    There’s nothing the US president could do to poke the Russian bear –other than escalate it to a hot war – other than this. This is an outgoing diplomatic move, and that is all.

  • ryedaft@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    They only have 300 km range. They are very nice but still. Pretty sure Ukraine has struck further inland with drones.

  • eran_morad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    something about this seems kind of fucky. the time to do this was years ago. what is brandon’s calculation? that russia won’t do shit because their bitch is taking over? or is he finally convinced, somehow, that russia could never do shit in the first place?

    • _bcron_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I’m gonna preface this by saying I totally don’t support this so don’t shoot the messenger, but half of it was that Russia doesn’t have the resources to prolong this war indefinitely. For every dollar Ukraine spends Russia loses a couple, for every Ukrainian casualty there are well over half a dozen Russian casualties. Russia staying in this war is catastrophic for Russia so there are geopolitical reasons for people wanting this war to not end but to continue. Eventually Russia would be forced to give up.

      But, now time is suddenly on Russia’s side because the new administration will likely withold aid in an attempt to broker a deal that will almost certainly involve ceding Russian-occupied land, so it’s basically a Hail Mary play right now. No more playing defense, push right to the end zone before the buzzer goes off. If they can actually strike where DPRK troops are staging, hopefully Europe can continue in the absence of the US, that kind of thing

      • eran_morad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        it smacks of desperation. but whatever damages russia can only be seen as a boon for humanity. i think brandon may be trying to salvage some positive glimmer in what is otherwise his historic failure of a presidency.

        • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          but whatever damages russia can only be seen as a boon for humanity.

          Yes, I too get $1 trickled down everytime Russia loses $1. My life is invested in the high oil prices since the war started, and I hope more services are cut so that more can be spent to diminish Russia. I’m sure the US will win a nuclear war too, so everything will be worth it. Saying this, helps make sure I get a spot in the VIP nuclear bunkers when the Fallout Boy reality will surely just get us to support the rulership of those who destroyed the US.

        • _bcron_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Opine if that besoothes you, but Russia’s benchmark rate is >20%, their inflation is equally bonkers, and they’re now leaning on North Korean troops. There is definitely desperation in this war

          • eran_morad@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            it’s obviously a desperate attempt at fixing his epic cowardly fuckup in ukraine. both sides can be desparate, in case you are unaware.

        • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Historic failure? I think domestically he has been an excellent President. Probably better than Obama. We got really lucky or he did a good job with inflation and the soft landing.

          We had much lower inflation than most nations. Gaza left a nasty stain, but that was a small part of what he did as President.

      • eran_morad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah. I have voted D my entire life and you fucks can’t understand the simple reality that this guy fucked us with his hubris.

        Check my fucking comment history, you imbecile.

    • GetOffMyLan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think north Korea entering the fight likely has a lot to do with it.

      Plus now trump will have to actively take this permission away as opposed to not giving it.

      • eran_morad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        it just seems like something outside of brandon’s ability, doing something strategic to fuck trump. the north korea angle i agree with.

  • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    While they won’t be able to reach Moscow with these, even from within Kursk, I am willing to bet the authorization was withheld on intelligence grounds. A lot of things in the war make sense if you look at it from the perspective that arms support can’t be guaranteed.

    Instead of letting Ukraine just burn through weapons, the US and allies have waited until they have the full operational capability to deploy the weapons with extreme effectiveness. They’ve had ATACMS for a while, so I suspect they held off deep strikes until the most effective targets had been identified and the likelihood of effective strike was near certain.

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s giving everyone involved a lot of credit. To be honest, I sort of doubt these decisions were quite that rational.

      • Archer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Blindly stumbling along then trying to pretend it was 4D chess all along sounds much more like us

  • credo@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I believe NYT makes you login, even on a gift link. Here is a TLDR:

    President Biden has authorized Ukraine to use U.S.-supplied long-range Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) to strike Russian and North Korean forces in Russia, a significant shift in U.S. policy. This decision comes in response to Russia’s introduction of North Korean troops into the conflict and their anticipated assault on Ukrainian forces in the Kursk region.

    The move reflects growing concerns over Ukraine’s ability to withstand simultaneous assaults while defending territory. The authorization aims to bolster Ukraine’s defense, target high-value military assets, and deter North Korean involvement. However, it has sparked debate among U.S. officials over escalation risks, as Russia might retaliate against the U.S. or its allies.

    President-elect Donald Trump, who has vowed to reduce U.S. support for Ukraine, is set to take office in two months, adding urgency to the decision. The Ukrainian strategy may include using captured Russian territory in Kursk as leverage in potential future negotiations. Meanwhile, the risk of Russian countermeasures remains a central concern for Biden’s administration and its allies.

    My take: I’ve been waiting on this since the US election. It’s sound strategy of we believe Putin won’t want to escalate with NATO before Trump takes office.

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    There’s obviously no logic whatsoever in allowing Russia to attack Ukraine freely from within its own borders while Ukraine is allowed to only defend inside its own borders. And Russia even thinks Crimea is part of Russia by some fucked up kindergarten bully logic.

    No war ever in the history of mankind has followed such logic and neither does this one. If Russia threatens the use of nuclear weapons, then it is doing that without any sensible reason and it might have just as well done that without any war going on anywhere.