LOL.

We pay for 4K, but we don’t get more than 720p unless we use some proprietary shit hardware and agree to their super-invasive “privacy policy” - and they expect people to NOT set sail in the high seas? GTFO…

  • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Literally every single time I want to watch any specific movie it’s not on any streaming service without buying or renting, and I don’t mean new or recent movies. So yeah, I’m pirating again.

  • rengoku@social.venith.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    What you say is exactly what I feel.

    When I pay for a service, as long as I abide by the ToS, service provider should give me their products in full.

    Your protection should not violate my right.

  • BobGnarley@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is the number one reason I won’t ever pay for a netflix subscription (or others) again. Pay for 4K but you dont get 4K if you want to watch on your laptop or android streaming box that they don’t approve of. Like how much fucking greedier could you be? Fuck them I hope they all go the way of blockbuster soon.

  • rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I wonder what happened in those four years that gave people a lot of time to watch movies but not a lot of money to pay for them 🤔

  • onlinepersona@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I bet we’ll reach a point again where normal services are just so shit that piracy is normal again. Then they’ll try and take down even more things. Hopefully then we’ll decide to move operations to I2P.

    CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

  • maus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I can easily say that the amount of my friends and family that have become interested in my Emby setup has expontentially consistently increased every round that these streaming providers have increased their rates.

    The experience of launching 7 different streaming apps to find something, content constantly vanishing or moving platforms, and just an overall poor user experience coupled with doubling/tripling of each platforms costs…

    • brax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      The companies have almost successfully re-introduced the very problem that streaming originally solved.

      It’s like this dipshits don’t want our money. I’ve always been firm that any content removed from streaming services is a message from that content company that they don’t want the money of the customers subscribed to said service and thus are okay with those people pirating it instead.

      If they cared about the money, they’d had left the content there.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m willing to pay for one, maybe two subscriptions, and ain’t nobody got time to dig for which service has what show to find out season 2 is on some other service entirely.

    Piracy provides a better user experience 🤷‍♂️

    • Howdy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Got two. Not doing anymore. Ive had up to 4 or 5 and still couldn’t find what I wanted.

    • Dave@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      For the record, you can use justwatch.com and it will tell you exactly where you can watch it, and which seasons. But I’m still not paying for multiple subscriptions.

      • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I generally agree with him, but there are a lot of people who pirate simply because they don’t want to pay. And I’m not casting moral judgment here, i just feel like it bears mentioning lol “almost always” is pretty generous

        • VR20X6@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          If that’s true on its face, then you’re not losing any money either way since they are never going to pay regardless even if you try to force them to.

          Meanwhile, you can absolutely scare away what could have been a paying customer by offering dogshit service.

          • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            That’s never been an assumption you can make.

            If you hand me a $10 version of a thing or a $5 option of the exact same thing, I’m taking the $5. Free is no different. Especially when they can do it from the comfort of their home and not drive to a mall to buy the CD or whatever. Remember what year it was when this all started man.

            • VR20X6@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Remember what year it was when this all started man.

              1903 when Edison v. Lubin was filed?

              • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                If you’re going to be a smartass then I have no desire to continue this conversation. I am talking about when piracy became mainstream via napster because it became easy for people to get free music.

        • faintwhenfree@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          No it also means it’s a service problem in the sense that it’s not priced right for a geography. Pricing a game $70 where local average monthly income is $120 a month is a service problem. If you expect people from that geographic region to pay, the product should be priced within their means. And thus argument is valid only for digital goods where every new copy of the said goods costs mere few cents.

          • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            You’re gonna have to put in some work to convince me he used “service“ to also say “too expensive” when he said that. Hell GAAS as a concept didn’t even exist when he said that.

        • Facebones@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Actually not very true in regards to gaming at least, a study found a decently wide majority of game pirates end up buying the game. Alot of em just either use it as a demo or to bypass the copy protection garbage that fucks up the game they want to pay for.

          • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            There is no way they could possibly know the percentage of Pirates to do that. Just because it occurs doesn’t mean there aren’t countless people who do it for free things. It’s also important to remember that those claims come from advocates, so you need to take it with a ton of caveats/pinches of salt. They have a pretty strong incentive to make that case.

        • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Lets compare three options as example:

          One streaming service with everything:

          • monetary costs: 25 €/month
          • opportunity cost: login, type name in search bar, enjoy in good quality, language and subtitles of choice

          Piracy:

          • monetary costs: 0-5 €/month (hardware/vpn)
          • opportunity costs: keep up to date with existing aggregator sites, take protective measures against identification, be wary of malware, limited scope of languages and subtitles, varying quality

          Current streaming services:

          • monetary costs: 100 €/month or more, if you cover most services
          • opportunity cost: login to each service, look if they have the particular series/movie, be limited by region to which languages and subtitles you can use, have only certain episodes or certain seasons of a series, get a movie as a result, but actually have to pay extra for lending it…

          People choose whether to pay monetary or opportunity costs. For a broke student priacy might still be the way to go, because they have time but not money. For most people a convenient streaming service will be the way to go though, because not having to worry about everything around and just finding your movie/series in 30 seconds, after you put dinner in the plates is the preferred option.

          The current situation combines high monetary costs with high opportunity costs, so that piracy becomes attractive to many people, who would be happy to pay for a streaming service, that actually covers everything.

          So i think “almost always” is perfectly applicable. Also keep in mind, that the offer of pirated stuff is directly related to the demand. if the demand reduces, so will the offer, which in this case would make piracy even less convenient. Of course the pricing matters, and if the one streaming service would cost say 50 €/month, more people would pirate again. But the dominant factor first is the service quality.

          • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            He made that statement when streaming barely existed. People were still primarily buying DVDs. That was the late 2000’s when it was only Netflix, maybe Hulu was just starting, and game streaming was barely a concept.

    • Steve@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Im willing to pay for two. It used to be netflix and prime, then hulu, paramount plus, disney…

      Now its down to one- Proton VPN 🏴‍☠️

  • OpenStars@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Bold of you to think that they even think of us at all.

    I actually mean that seriously: we continue seeing, over and over, that no, quite often they do NOT expect people to NOT do that, they quite simply DGAF. They pirate us, we pirate them, it becomes just another “cost of doing business”, until they are strong enough to eventually crack down further. See ad blocking & Chrome recently, after multiple decades of internet ads pushing the limits.

    It’s like a zombie nom noming your brains - after like 2 bites it’ll get bored and wander off, and it literally doesn’t even need to “eat”, it simply is so fucking DUMB that it doesn’t know what else to do with itself. It is truly horrifying b/c while your entrails may be strewn about on the floor, or in the throats of tens of zombies, they in turn… don’t even have the decency to be aware that you’ve died!?

    Lower-level managers sell ideas to higher-level managers, and “logic” has little to do with those conversations, compared to the amount of emo-stroking that goes on “oh, you will become so rich, and powerful, and handsome, and brave, and precious” (from here:-P) - and so long as enough people play along, that happens!

    Our world is just so fucking STUPID.

    That said, what they do is on them, while what we do is on us. Find a way to live - hopefully by finding a way to contribute, if/where you can.

  • Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    When Netflix had (seemingly) everything I was totally cool and the gang with paying for that service.

    Now I have:

    • Netflix
    • Amazon Prime
    • Apple TV
    • Disney+
    • NowTv
    • fuck knows what else

    and I still can’t find the content I want to watch. I had an urge to watch The Good, The Bad And The Ugly the other day. Could I find it on any services I pay a combined £50+ a month for? Could I fuck. Why would they be surprised they’re pushing people to ‘alternative’ sources? Sure, I can rent or buy Barbie and Oppenheimer if I want, but I don’t want. What I want is access to the tens of thousands of old, excellent, films that have been made.

    • Bronzie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      My NAS literally arrived today.
      I’m done.

      Been paying for years but it’s becomming equally predatory as linear TV so I’m out.

      • Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        For A Few Dollars More is so-so (but I’d still watch it again), but The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly is epic.

        And if you enjoy them, then take a crack at High Plains Drifter or Pale Rider which are both excellent though share an underlying theme. The Outlaw Josey Wales is also well worth a watch, as is the magnificent (and best picture Oscar winner) Unforgiven starring and directed by an older, wiser, and grittier Clint Eastwood.

        • weirdo_from_space@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Definitely will check out High Plains Drifter and Magnificent Seven. Pale Rider and Unforgiven are already on the list along with Gran Torino. Also already watched The Outlaw Josey Wales, it was a really good movie.

          • Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            You might also want to add Yojimbo and The Seven Samurai to your list too - they’re the Kurasawa films that A Fistful of Dollars and The Magnificent Seven are western (in both senses) remakes of.

      • t0fr@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Why do we need a podcast focused server. Podcasts for the most part are free. Just need a client like AntennaPod and listen away

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    12% over four years? Damn. Somehow I had the impression that there’d been a significant increase.

    Netflix revenue is up by roughly 60% in the same four years.

    • SitD@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      if these two numbers were reversed, piracy sites would get the same treatment as videos with actual criminal content. we’re lucky

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m really surprised by this, specially since I cancelled Netflix over a year ago myself…

      It’s like renting movies that can be taken away at any time since you don’t own them. And ads can be introduced whenever. Not to mention poor streaming quality on top of all this.

  • Wage_slave@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Not gonna lie, if you asked me what I would think the increase would be and I would have assumed it be a lot higher.

    But then again, that could be the part of the pirate crew that doesn’t use a VPN and is easily identified upon entering the site.

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I agree. These stats are to be taken with a grain of salt.

      Personally, I saw an extreme increase among my peers in piracy, streaming and Plex servers.