French immigrants are eating our pets!
You must log in or register to comment.
Such a cute kitty snail! Can you post just the picture?
Its an “AI generated image at snail” :3
Detection for snail is positive.
I have two of those cats. I still can’t catch them when its time to go to bed.
I mean, it could be a manual photoshop job. Just because it’s not AI doesn’t mean it’s real.
But also the detector is probably wrong - it’s likely an AI image using a different model than the detector was trained to detect.
There were a lot of really good images like that well before AI. Anyone remember Photoshop Friday?
Can we bring that back?
There’s a sort of… Sheen, to a lot AI images. Obviously you can prompt this away if you know what you’re doing, but its developing a bit of a look to my eye when people don’t do that.
They’re often too smooth.
I mean, it could be a manual photoshop job.
It could, but the double spiral in the shell indicates AI to me. Snail shells don’t grow like that. If it was a manual job, someone would have used a picture of a real shell.
Also the fact that the grain on the side of the shell is perpendicular to the grain on the top, and it changes where the cat ear comes up in front of it.
Very telltale sign of AI is a change of pattern in something when a foreground object splits it.
Not saying it’s always a guarantee, but it’s a common quirk and it’s pretty easy to identify.
I can tell from some of the pixels and from seeing quite a few shops in my time.
Your reference is ancient and dusty and it makes me feel old. Stop it.
Agreed. The aggressive depth of field is another smoking gun that usually indicates an AI image.
Snail shells don’t grow like that but this is clearly a snat, not a snail.
Even cnailshells would have to adhere to the basic laws of conchology though
So only 2% “not likely to be AI-generated or deepfake”… that means that it’s almost definitely AI, got it!? :-P
Not unclear as a whistle.
So the prophecy is fulfilled
My guess is the AI was trained on a combination of cat videos and sponge bob.
Chat is the picture real?
It’s a real valid picture in png format.
Oui, biensur!
HAS SCIENCE GONE TO FAR?!
No spooky eyes, no extra limbs, no eery smile? - 100% real, genuine photograph! 👍
“We investigated ourselves and found nothing wrong.”
Back2thefuture_iknowthisone.png
That’s a song by the police, right?
Iseewhatyoudidthere.jpg
LOL
Honestly, they should fight fire with fire? Another vision model (like Qwen VL) would catch this
You can ask it “does this image seem fake?” and it would look at it, reason something out and conclude it’s fake, instead of… I dunno, looking for smaller patters or whatever their internal model does?
cute snat…
That’s clearly a cail
Are we all looking at the same snussy?
We get them a lot around here. They don’t make for good pets, but they keep the borogoves at bay.
Which is great, honestly. Borogoves themselves are fine, but it’s not worth the risk letting them get all mimsy.
yeah just shopped
It’s not, look at the shell
…you know people made fake pictures before image generation, right?
They made fake pictures before computers existed too.
This obviously can’t be true, how did they do it without Photoshop? /s
I mean, optical illusions have been used to fool audiences for years.
https://youtube.com/shorts/bsyRnmdceqQ?si=SfUM2mssqc1sjvNt
This is a motion picture of course but the idea is “faking” an image isn’t too far off.
Hehe, I know, I’m just being silly - the /s on my message means it’s in a sarcastic tone :) but thanks for taking the time to share that video!
I’ve seen the cave paintings deer and horses everywhere but when I look around nothing but rocks and trees.
Ignorant Americans, never even heard of the common snailcat
Where the fuck are you from that they aren’t called catsnails? Odd. Been catsnails here since I can remember.
What tool is this? I assume the tool is also AI based?
