I am not a teen.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    In the one episode I saw? No. It seemed almost entirely gratuitous. I don’t need to watch a prostitute sucking off Peter Dinklage to know he’s having sex with a bunch of prostitutes what with him already being in bed with them.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      I often find sex scenes to be gratuitous and unnecessary, but I would never let sex prevent me from watching an amazing TV show or movie. I think that’s just foolish.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        When there are countless other good things to watch that don’t involve those? Why spend my time on the ones that do just because they’re also considered to be good? I won’t enjoy them as much, so obviously they won’t be as good for me as they are for others.

        I could be missing all kinds of amazing things to watch for all kinds of reasons. So could you. There’s only 24 hours in a day. You have to pick and choose.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          20 days ago

          Just a trivial and silly way to limit your exposure to different types of film/TV.

          A sex scene might make me take a point off of my score for a movie, but I’ve seen far too many flat out incredible movies/shows with unnecessary sex scenes to know just how much I’d be missing if I removed such a large chunk of content from the pool right off the bat like that.

          No thanks. I will watch something without regard for its sexual content, because I’m an adult. And then, if it turned out to have a gratuitous sex scene, that will factor into my opinion of the thing.

          The thing about gratuitous and unnecessary sex scenes is, by definition, they are unnecessary. So if you really care that much, why not just fast forward through them? You would miss nothing (otherwise it wouldn’t have been unnecessary).

          I recently watched “Jeanne Dielman…” after seeing it top the BFI Top 100 list. That movie has quite a bit of sex, but it was well worth the watch, and it would be a shame to have prevented myself from even having that opportunity because it contains sex.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            20 days ago

            It wasn’t a sex scene in the case of the first episode of GoT.

            I don’t have a problem with a sex scene. Especially if it serves the plot.

            I literally said so at the beginning of this comment chain:

            I have no problem with sex scenes and nudity in films where they make sense. Basic Instinct wouldn’t make sense without them. Last Tango in Paris wouldn’t make sense without them. They’re both movies worth watching.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              20 days ago

              Yeah I understand that and agree that most sex scenes are unnecessary. And I am talking about movies and TV shows that are considered some of the greatest media ever created, that might happen to have unnecessary sex in it. I’m not going to arbitrarily limit myself and miss out on watching that stuff because there might be 90 seconds (of a 2+ hour film) of unnecessary sex. Again, because I’m an adult.

              Using your example, you are missing out on one of the best stories ever told on television (until the last season at least), because the first episode of the show had sex in it that you found to be unnecessary (and btw, while most of the sex in that show is unnecessary, there is at least one or two *very important" sex scenes in season 1 that one might not recognize as being important… Yet).

              As someone who read the books, I was able to tell which sex scenes were important, and which weren’t, but not all of it is unnecessary.

              I understand your position, I just think it’s silly (and kind of sad).

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                20 days ago

                And, as I said, you might be missing out on one of the best stories ever told on television for some other reason, what with “one of the best stories ever told” being a very subjective measure. I often disagree with things that people consider to be the “greatest ever” when it comes to movies and TV. As someone who is only mildly interested in high fantasy, I doubt it would have ever elevated it to that level for me.

                I was told that Breaking Bad was the greatest ever. I watched more than the first episode. I didn’t like it. I don’t like shows where everyone is irredeemably awful.

                • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  20 days ago

                  I may miss out on things, but it will only be because I wasn’t aware of it. I wouldn’t do something to arbitrarily limit my exposure to those things because someone has sex in it. Because I’m an adult.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    20 days ago

                    I watched an episode. I didn’t like it. I stopped and watched something else. I’m not sure what the big deal here is aside from you not accepting that I just wasn’t interested in something you like.

                    Why should I keep watching a show I don’t like when there are show for me to watch that I do like just because it’s a popular show? I have never cared about what is popular and never will.