So I’ve heard and seen the newest launch, and I thought for a private firm it seemed cool they were able to do it on their own, but I’m scratching my head that people are gushing about this as some hail mary.

I get the engineering required is staggering when it comes to these rocket tests, but NASA and other big space agencies have already done rocket tests and exploring bits of the moon which still astounds me to this day.

Is it because it’s not a multi billion government institution? When I tell colleagues about NASA doing stuff like this yeaaaars ago they’re like “Yea yea but this is different it’s crazy bro”

Can anyone help me understand? Any SpaceX or Tesla fans here?

  • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’ve seen so many people grudgingly pretending what they saw wasn’t one of the coolest fucking things they’ve seen all year all because they hate Musk. Like, you know he’s not personally involved in the design or manufacture of these things right? By all accounts he’s more of a hindrance and these amazing fears of engineering have been accomplished despite him, not because of him.

    I personally don’t really care how big of a douche Musk is, as long as he’s willing to fund these kinds of things.

    • neveraskedforthis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Like, you know he’s not personally involved in the design or manufacture of these things right?

      Just don’t look up who made the design changes to stainless steel, aerodynamic flaps or tower capture.

    • Anticorp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      What did people see that was so cool?

      I personally don’t really care how big of a douche Musk is, as long as he’s willing to fund these kinds of things.

      He’s not funding this, dude. We are. Space X gets massive government contracts and subsidies. The rest comes from income streams like Starlink.

    • greedytacothief@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      So I was teaching some kids snowboarding, one kid started talking to me about musk on the chairlift. He tells me that musk is the greatest engineer to ever live. I say that he’s really more of a business man buying up companies. Kid is not convinced. I tell him that the only engineering that musk may have done was software engineering on PayPal. Kid thinks that’s great support of his claim.

      Adults and 11 year olds are pretty much the same, so I would say there’s lots of people that think musk is a super genius. Probably a dwindling amount, but there’s a lot of people on earth.

      • turmacar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        He bought co-founder status at Paypal too IIRC. He was ousted in part because he wanted to rename it “x.com”. Weird that.

      • Furbag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Unfortunately, a lot of smart people are under his spell too. I had to listen to the CEO of a medium sized company wax poetic about how he’s a super genius and the greatest boon to human ingenuity in a century, desperately trying to hold my tongue as I rolled my eyes into the back of my skull.

        I think he’s an okay businessman. That’s about as much praise as I’m willing to afford him. He’s definitely charismatic enough to convince a room full of investors that the ideas he’s pitching are worthwhile. Part of that is that his passion for these projects are genuine, and when you put somebody in a room with a passionate guy, the enthusiasm tends to rub off on them just a little.

        Most of his investments that garnered him his wealth are just him being at the right place at the right time. Getting in on PayPal when Ecommerce was in it’s infancy and partnering with Ebay to take advantage of shopaholics who just couldn’t help themselves. Buying his way into Tesla right when EVs were primed to take off and pushing hard for an economy class variant that could be mass produced rapidly (in an already-made factory that Toyota closed down, no less!). Founding SpaceX and pouring a shit ton of his own money into rocket and aeronautics R&D right around the time the U.S. Government was looking for cheap contractors to take over the space program. I think the only project he miscalculated on was buying Twitter for way too much money when social media was really starting to stagnate.

        His politics are fucking weird, though. Him being a Trump nutter is really not helping his “I’m a genius” image. I find his personality to be pretty repugnant. I already didn’t like him because back in the early days of Tesla he pushed all the management to essentially become slavedrivers for the line workers. I live in California near the plant and I had friends who worked there in production that got nearly worked to death, extreme overtime and weekend shifts, few breaks, the only saving grace was the above average pay that kind of kept them trapped in that hell of a job for way too long. Then the whole Thai soccer team incident happened and I was so over him. Haven’t heard anything about him since that has made me feel like he deserves to be the richest cunt in the fucking universe.

      • Tabooki@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        He’s literally the chief ticket designer as well as CTO. Deeply involved in the engineering.

    • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      you know he’s not personally involved in the design or manufacture of these things right?

      He actually is. Everyday astronaut has done several interviews with him and the dude knows about rockets and engineering.

      • Tabooki@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        He’s the chief rocket designer as well as chief technology officer. He’s deeply involved and is well regarded as an incredible engineer

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    A lot of people pointed out a lot of firsts, huge cost reductions, regular flights, but let’s look from the opposite direction ……

    Mass to orbit. SpaceX came from nowhere not too many years ago, jumped ahead of established manufacturers, until now they launch most of the worlds satellite mass to orbit, with an unparalleled success record, even with the recent failures. And this is with a rapidly growing space market

    Everything they’ve achieved has not only let them scale up far surpassing the rest of the industry across the world, combined, but with reliability and cost to attract all that business

    I don’t know what it would take for you to call it a revolution, but the impact on space business is revolutionary

  • Short answer economics. Long answer a reusable rocket platform reduces the cost per launch to a fraction the price of traditional launches. That reduced the price per kg of mass in space making far more possible in space. I think ultimately its selling the idea that humanity can be a multi planetary species where we shall own the stars.

  • witx@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    What you’re asking is akin to: why are people impressed by the airplane? We’ve already reached the Americas and India by boat.

    SpaceX, and others actually are not advancing science per se, but are greatly improving/optimising the engineering so that it can be used in cheaper ways by science.

    There’s also the issue that after the moon landing we didn’t really improve that much and much of the knowledge faded

    • LengAwaits@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      There’s also the issue that after the moon landing we didn’t really improve that much and much of the knowledge faded

    • Anticorp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      But he shouldn’t. He’s a hack.

      He’s also a stupid doodoo brain, with poop and pee in his pants! Cacca doodoo!

        • oatscoop@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Which is hilarious, as the eponymous Culture is the epitome of luxury gay space anarchism. Pan-sexual, non-monogamous space hippies that can (and do) change their biological sex just by thinking about it. People so past the idea of “gender” that they consider giving any serious weight to the concept barbaric.

          I know it’s a rhetorical question: but is Elon stupid or something?

    • Tabooki@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s not true in the least. He is CEO, CTO and Chief rocket designer. He’s deeply involved in every step

      • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        He’s far too busy with X, Trump, and his relationship drama to have any time to do anything close to being involved. Of the company’s he’s bought or been involved in creating SpaceX is toward the bottom of his priorities from what I hear.

      • Eranziel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        He can give himself whatever titles he likes, that doesn’t mean he makes any positive technical contribution.

        • Tabooki@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Watch a few of the multi hour interviews he given while raining through explaining everything. He knows what he’s doing if you’ve not been paying attention. Lots of reasons to not like him but your completely wrong on this one

  • vzq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    NASA makes extensive use of contractors. The moon hardware was largely designed, built and tested by private companies.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I’m not very impressed by nasa. What have they done in the last 50 years? If anything, they seem to be sleeping.

    I honestly don’t think they have the desire to make earth a space traveling civilization. They are just looking for bacteria and will continue to do so for hundreds of years. It’s all so pointless.

  • originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Because they are impressive in the way NASA was. Which is the problem - we should be doing this as a nation and not subsidizing whatever a billionaire fancies at the moment.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Exactly. It’s concerning that a private individual is allowed to do this, much less without government competition. It’s like we’ve forgotten that the boosters that got us to the moon were the same missiles that terrorized Britain.

      • bstix@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yes. It’s down right scary to think about what the consequences of private ownership will mean.

        In best case it will turn into a profitable business which means burning a shit ton of fuel in the atmosphere and leaving tons of garbage in orbit.

        Yes it’s impressive that it’s possible, but is it less impressive if it means screwing up the option for others to launch anything in 50 years just because the richest man on earth right now wanted to earn more money.

        It’s a small step for a large corporation, but it’s a large step backwards for humanity.

        I’d rather see new technologies like the slingshot launches becoming successful than seeing SpaceX launching the same old dirty rockets over and over for profit.

    • treadful@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      eh, it will probably be good thing to just commercialize space buses and leave NASA to the science.

  • nutsack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    first of all, allow me to State my opinion of Elon musk in one short sentence.

    second of all, I will answer your question.

  • Lung@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    My guy they just caught an object falling from space using a pair of giant chopsticks

  • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Not a Tesla fan and I absolutely despise the cult around Elon. SpaceX is a bit different though. Luckily with Elon’s many, many side project misadventures he’s pretty hands-off with SpaceX. Ultimately it comes down to being largely engineer driven and given sufficient (but yes, still government) funding to try new things without the scrutiny of direct government agencies. The hours are usually terrible from what I hear, but this varies team to team.

    My biggest complaint is that they do lowball engineers using the stock as reasoning for why it’s worth accepting. FWIW historically that has been the case, and many engineers there do effectively have golden handcuffs. But expecting infinite golden handcuff level growth forever is unrealistic.

  • Thorry84@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    For me being impressed with SpaceX is kinda like loving a piece of art even though the creator turned out to be an asshole. Or liking Star Trek, even though Berman was shady af to put it mildly.

    What SpaceX does is very impressive from a technical point of view. Even if the rocket never amounts to anything except this one successful test, it’s still amazing they pulled it off. It tickles my engineer brain. And I think it’s worth to honor all the people that made it happen, despite them having to work for Musk. Combine this with what could be in the future and you can hopefully see why people hail this test flight.

    Now I still have serious doubts about Starship in the moon program. The on orbit refueling seems very sketchy and unproven at this point. Sure they will get two rockets into orbit, mate them up and transfer some fuel, that’s a given at this point. But how much fuel are we talking? And how fast does the turnaround need to be to prevent losing a lot of it? How many ships and how many launches? Will this completely offset the cheaper launch costs due to reusability? It’s a huge unknown and will push back the moon program to well into the 2030s.

  • Mothra@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Lots of people here with very well fleshed out takes. Mine is simpler though, and by no means mutually exclusive:

    Good marketing.

    They know how to advertise themselves as a brand. They’re easy to follow on any social media platform. For one or another, people are going to be looking at them- either in admiration, comparing it to others, just to be critical, or simply out of curiosity.