If I am driving on a road, and a flying saucer with a spotlight is hovering ahead waiting to land, do I have to stop in the roadway and yield to them? Or do they have to yield to cars in the road? I checked my states driving manual and they don’t mention alien air/spacecraft at all.

I would guess that the UFO would have the right of way, as traffic would have to eventually stop for them anyways. Should I just stop in the roadway and put my hazards on so the flying saucer pilot is aware I am yielding the right of way to them?

  • Vandals_handle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 hours ago

    How can you distinguish between native and alien UFOs? Once you’ve identified where it is from, is it still a UFO?

  • oo1@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    if it drops down, reverses direction and increases speed, then you’d better run.

  • Deestan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    A few general traffic laws apply:

    1: The UFO is not a legally registered road vehicle and they must yield to all traffic.

    2: If you see a hazardous situation, like the UFO not clearly following traffic laws giving you space, you must do your part to avoid injury by avoiding a collision.

    So after you do brake for the UFO, or swerve and honk, you may go to the police and inform them of the aliens’ traffic violation. They may then get a fine.

    If you say “fuck it Im in the right” and crash into them, you are both breaking the law, but you are in bigger trouble for willfully endangering life and property. You get prison, the aliens get a fine.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    You should yield to them, for the same reason a fly yields to a human hand trying to turn them into goo.

  • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    If its hovering above the lane and you can drive under it without crashing and it seems like it isn’t going to land or inte ding to land, there is no law requiring you to yield but I personally would try to switch lanes and not be directly underneath it.

    If it seems like it is going to land, I would yield to it same as a plane landing on a highway, but usually highway police are there to start a traffic break after being radiod by local ATC anyway.

    There is no need to put on your hazards, they can see that you have stopped. If they can’t, then it doesn’t matter since they can’t see you.

    I would honestly recommend trying to leave the area as quickly and safely as you can, because if it isn’t hostile already, it will be when the army arrives.

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    You have the right of way unless there is a pedestrian or a sign warning you of animal crossings. If you see a UFO, pull over and contact a mental health professional immediately.

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Speaking as a Voxon who captains a Kerglyz KG-7 scout craft (with the boosted manifold), I feel like I can offer an interesting viewpoint.

    If we hover before landing it is a sign that we see you and are yelding to you, you can just pass under us, but please, to make it clear that you understand the situation and to alert us if we have strayed into your path inadvertetly, just flash your highbeams twice, indicating that you see us and intend to pass.

    We are normally just doing surveys and gathering data, we are doing our best to stay out of the way.

    • ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      I flash high beams twice to indicate the other road user may pass. Could we clarify this point before someone gets into another interplanetary insurance kerfuffle?

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Thank you for your concern, as it stands now that local way of interaction between vehicles is at odds with the current galactic standard as noted in Book 29 (transportation), Chapter 61 (optical communication), section 5 (visual spectrum), subsection 2 (visual specturm communication between space faring civilizations and non space faring civilizations)

        I will preset your comment as a suggestion to the grand court, who may agree to publish a local exception in Book 12 (exceptions).

  • Deceptichum@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    No.

    You were there first, and it’s your god given right to drive an automobile. These illegal aliens coming over here and landing on our roads should respect our laws.

    If they crash into you, sue them, as is also your god given right.

    I would recommend a dashcam.

    • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      No seriously, get a dashcam. Everyone should have a dashcam. Its probably one of the most invaluable tthings you can have installed onto your vehicle these days.

  • StrawberryPigtails@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I know it’s a joke question but here’s a serious answer:

    I would treat it same as any other aircraft landing on the roadway. Give them space to do their thing because objects of greater potential energy ALWAYS have right of way, regardless of what liability laws say. Can’t sue ‘em if you’re dead.

    As for laws, a quick search didn’t find anything in Federal or Alabama law about it except that the FAA here in the US says pilots consider it only as a last resort option due to safety concerns. If figure it’s probably not a common enough occurrence for laws to be made about it. Other states or counties may have something about it though.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      I would imagine that legally, liability largely falls on the plane operator, though if you as a driver can avoid it, you would share in liability, perhaps moreso.

      1. Avoid things
      2. Then go by right-of-way

      Sort of how you approach 3/4-way stop signs (god I hate them).

      • StrawberryPigtails@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 hours ago

        In my profession (trucking) the only thing that matters is preventable/nonpreventable. Liability is something for the insurance company to worry about (mostly).

        This might be an interesting topic to suggest to Mike Rafi or Legal Eagle though.

    • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Depending on the roadway, it’s super dangerous. Telephone and power lines are hard to see, deadly hazards for aircraft in that situation. If something is landing on a road, it’s probably an extreme emergency, and it’s best to give them as much room as possible.

    • Emerald@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Makes sense. I think if there are no cars behind you, stopping and letting the saucer land is the best way to go

      • LemoineFairclough@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        It doesn’t matter if anything is behind you or not: any other road users would also be obligated to give up their right of way (by stopping) if you chose to stop, if doing so would help prevent collisions.