or even pseudo-incriminated for attempting to maintain our own life.

It seems so stupid that I’m like a suspect for wanting an exchange of information without dropping my pants and bending over. No, I don’t want cookies. Yes I want to read the article but no, I don’t want to “sign up.”

It makes me feel like being a f*cking hermit. But I prefer to pirate. Even though I’m not that good at it. Screw them. I got two private trackers, a VPN, and I hope that’s enough.

  • TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    It seems so strange to me that everyone buys the bullshit that personal data is worth very little.

    The data brokerage industry is a multi-trillion dollar industry. Yet, there are only ~8 billion people in the world, many of whom don’t have internet access or have very little data being traded. Thus it’s reasonably safe to assume that an average regular internet user’s data is worth somewhere in the region of $1,000 per year.

    These companies don’t do anything with the data. We create the data, they collect it and sell it, then whoever buys it is the one that actually makes something from it. If we allow the brokers a very generous profit margin, they are still stealing $500-700 from every one of us, every year.

    • Night Monkey@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      If you’re online. You need to assume that your data is being used without your permission whether you like it or not. Nothing is going to change. Look at the hordes of brain dead idiots who use tiktok

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Nothing is going to change.

        That’s the wrong attitude to have. It can change, and arguably it will change once a critical mass of people realise the value being stolen from them.

        You can’t build a car without paying for the nuts and bolts. The people who make nuts and bolts don’t know how to build a car, but they’re still paid a fair value based on the fact their product can be used in cars.

        We don’t know how to do anything with our data, but we should be paid based on the value derived from it by those that do.

        This problem affects everyone, including the people who make laws. It is entirely feasible that we can get enough people on side to change things and make it more fair. Incumbent businesses won’t like that, because it will reduce their profits (100% down to 30%), but what they’re doing now is absolutely wrong. They’d still be taking the piss at 30%, but at least that’s more in line with other industries.

        • Kepabar@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          That critical mass will never come because people don’t feel the data has been stolen from them.

          Rather, it’s traded in exchange for whatever online services they use.

          And to them it’s a decent trade.

          • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            I think that’s fair if the service is free. If I’m paying for it then they shouldn’t be double dipping with my data as well.

        • Night Monkey@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          I don’t want their money. I just want them to leave me alone. Now, the politicians? They would love their money. And I’m sure big tech lobbyists are already giving them some

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      The efficacy of advertising is sold primarily by advertisers. It’s possibly worth a vanishing fraction of what these ghouls say it’s worth. But so long as buying it and acting like a greedy invasive bastard is more profitable than ignoring it, even by a tiny margin, corporate giants will keep doing it, since the cost to them is a rounding error.

      The industry enabling this is large because they get to sell the same garbage to so many bastards.