• AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The legal definitions can be far removed from normal usage—in California “lynching” is when a crowd forcibly removes a suspect from police custody, since that was often a prelude to what we would recognize as actual lynching. But it’s been used charge protesters with “lynching” for interfering with the arrest of other protesters.

    • unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      That is interesting that it has bespoke legal definitions. The Wikipedia entry is what I expected

      Lynching is an extrajudicial killing by a group. It is most often used to characterize informal public executions by a mob in order to punish an alleged transgressor, punish a convicted transgressor, or intimidate people. It can also be an extreme form of informal group social control, and it is often conducted with the

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yes, legal definitions vary a lot by jurisdiction. “Assault and battery” is probably the most varied. Some places they’re two separate things.

      • StaticFalconar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I guess based on that definition, since it wasn’t proven yet that a group of people did this, it does not meet the criteria.

        • unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          A group could be three dudes in Klan robes. I haven’t seen anything yet indicating that applies here. But the history of Deep South racism is also a history of terrorism. It only takes three homicidal maniacs to terrify a county.