Commissioned by the Arab American Institute (AAI), the online poll of 2,505 American voters conducted between July 31 and August 1 found that 44% of U.S. voters would back Harris, 40% would support Republican nominee Donald Trump, and 11% would vote third party “if the election for president of the United States were held today.”

But if Harris were to endorse a suspension of U.S. arms shipments and diplomatic support for Israel “until there was a cease-fire and withdrawal of forces from Gaza,” her national support would grow from 44% to 49%.

A majority of Democratic voters say the Gaza crisis is either very or somewhat important in determining how they vote in November, according to the AAI poll.

The new survey, which has a margin of error of 2 percentage points, is consistent with an earlier poll commissioned by the Institute for Middle Eastern Understanding Policy Project, which found that Harris would bolster her chances in key battleground states if she backed an arms embargo.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    So AIPAC are a terror organization?

    If we can call the Hamas health ministry a terrorist organization, than the lobbying wing of the Israeli military must surely qualify.

    They will cause extreme social unrest and conflict to advance their political agenda. Leaving people to fear their attack as the reason they are complicit to them.

    The problem with a propaganda machine is that it can fuck you right up the ass and leave you thanking it for its service.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Then there’s words for that. State Sponsored Terrorism or Act of War.

          We don’t want to use those words though because that would mean Israel has been committing acts of war against Gaza for decades, regardless of where they were in the peace process. Instead we pretend Hamas aren’t a government and therefore things like the blockade aren’t Acts of War, they’re just internal military operations.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              It’s the difference between Iran and Al Qaeda. Nobody is saying they’re great people. But you treat those two differently.

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  A. Iran, not Iraq.

                  B. The people are not the state there. That’s part of why the distinction is made.

                  C. Be better.

                  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    The people are not the state there.

                    I’ll hear this line up front, and then I’ll watch the country get terrorized while Americans insist the victims of bombings deserve it.

                • ochi_chernye@startrek.website
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Honestly, where do you think you get off with this shit? Just a totally unwarranted, baseless, and factually inaccurate attack. Makes you look like a petty idiot.

              • zeephirus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Islamic STATE vs Jewish state… THEYRE THE SAME THING WITH DIFFERENT RELIGIOUS NUTJOBS AT THE HELM