In an episode of Two Nice Jewish Boys, which aired three weeks ago, host Weinstein said: “If you gave me a button to just erase Gaza, every single living being in Gaza would no longer be living tomorrow. I would press it in a second.”

He claimed that “most Israelis” would do the same.

Meningher added that they would also want to wipe out Palestinians in “the territories”.

The clip of Weinstein and Meningher lauding the idea of all five million Palestinians in the Gaza Strip and West Bank being wiped out has drawn fierce criticism online.

“Radio Rwanda in full effect here. This is deeply disturbing,” journalist Samira Mohyedeen wrote on X, referring to the broadcasts that incited genocide against the Tutsis during the 1994 Rwandan genocide.

  • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    You have to remember that their religion teaches them that non-jewish humans are, well, ‘not that important’

    To put it mildly

    • Kalysta@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The vast majority of Jewish people in the world realize this is wrong and ignore this part of their ancient teachings. Don’t go shaming the whole religion over some violent extremists.

      Israel was also secular when it was founded. Look it up. This is 100% on their government and right wing extremists and not Judiasm as a whole.

        • myslsl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Because if the majority of people following a particular religion reject a prior view as false or wrong, then arguably that view is no longer part of the religion.

          Religions aren’t crisp, unchanging, monolithic entities where everybody believes the same thing forever. If we’re talking about judaism in the sense of the views and practices jewish people actually subscribe to, then that seems like we are referring to beliefs they actually hold in a mainstream/current sense, not beliefs they previous held but now reject?

          • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            So you’re saying that because a religion allows you to choose which of God’s commandments, carefully passed down through every generation, you personally want to follow based on your gut feeling, can’t be shamed?

            Why should the ones who choose to deny parts of their religion be seen as representative of it over those who’ve chosen to uphold them?

            • myslsl@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              So you’re saying that because a religion allows you to choose which of God’s commandments, carefully passed down through every generation, you personally want to follow based on your gut feeling, can’t be shamed?

              No, that is not what I said.

              Why should the ones who choose to deny parts of their religion be seen as representative of it over those who’ve chosen to uphold them?

              I definitely answered this in my original comment.

      • Mammal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I do my best to always use the word Zionist before the word Israeli.

        Israel’s secularism is irrelevant to the overall racist ideology of Zionism that permeates Israeli society.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s in the religion’s text. “Judaism” is complicated as it can either mean religion, culture or ethnicity/race, but they said “religion teaches”, so we can assume that they’re referring to the practicing religious category.