• ravhall@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    You’re right. It didn’t become an issue until they beat him. And beating someone for yelling at your crime, big or small, should result in them also being beaten.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      You’re right. It didn’t become an issue until they beat him.

      So the bottle thrower had a chance to avoid this, and the yeller had a chance to avoid this. Neither chose the avoid it. Both chose to escalate it.

      And beating someone for yelling at your crime, big or small, should result in them also being beaten.

      Nope. You’re pretending that all people act rationally. If you expect that, you’re going to be disappointed. Not all people do that. Sorry, that’s life. So if you are involved in a situation like this, that doesn’t make it morally right for you to shoot someone, which is your position as stated before.

      The the bottle thrower shouldn’t have thrown. The yeller shouldn’t have yelled, and nobody would be talking about this right now because nothing would have happened.

      • ravhall@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Maybe if she didn’t dress sexy. Maybe if that black man wasn’t in the wrong neighborhood. Maybe if they spoke better English. Maybe if they they didn’t speak up… they wouldn’t have been hurt.

        Blocked.