Every generation has slang, but Gen Alpha’s has a particularly unhinged quality, some parents say. Still, experts say their bad rep isn’t totally deserved.

In the beginning, there was “skibidi.”

It appeared abruptly in the lexicons of kids under 14 — the first slang term unique to Generation Alpha. Parents’ ears perked up as they began to hear it around the dinner table. It could mean bad, cool, or nothing at all, their kids explained. Then a dozen more incomprehensible terms followed suit.

Gen Z’s “slay” and “tea” are officially vintage, giving way to “sigma,” “gyatt” and “fanum tax.”

Everyone’s getting whiplash.

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    They’ll go away soon enough. It’s just been dialed up to 11 through media like tiktok.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    My 14-year-old isn’t especially slangy, but occasionally she asks me if I’ve heard some term or other, and I invariably haven’t. Most recently, it was “Scene,” which is apparently some sort of fashion aesthetic.

    • Klanky@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      ‘Scene’ kids were the Hot Topic emo kids when I was a teenager 20ish years ago. As someone who was into 2nd wave emo, it always made me die a little that ‘Scene’ is what most people think of when they hear ‘emo’.

    • Zahille7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      “Scene” was around when I was in middle and high school around 10 years ago.

      They were like the preppy goth kids, who listened to Avril Lavigne and such.

      Edit: there’s also a Hollywood Undead song that has the lines “wake up, shave beard, grab beer, put on some scene gear”

      • solrize@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        And Harry don’t mind if he don’t make the scene. He’s got a daytime job, he’s doing all right.

        Avril Lavigne? Of Lavigne and Shirley? ;)

        • seathru@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          They’ve been around for nigh on 20 years. Age doesn’t have anything to do with it, it’s musical tastes.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Cool. I was 27 in that case. Why would you expect me to be out there discovering new bands when I was trying to get my career off the ground?

            • seathru@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              I guess because I’m the same age and was getting my career off the ground at the same time. But everyone has different life experiences. I cannot fathom not exposing myself to new music.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                But everyone has different life experiences.

                And yet you decided it was unreasonable for me to have not heard of this band.

                And there is no way you are my age and “Scene” was a thing when you were in high school. That’s just bullshit. This says that it started in the early 2000s:

                https://aesthetics.fandom.com/wiki/Scene

                • Zahille7@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Damn you went into this thread pissed off, didn’t you? You replied to the wrong person. I’m the one who said scene was a thing 10 years ago when I was in high school and middle school.

                  Chill and fully read the comments (username and all) before replying.

  • Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Reminds me of Nadsat from the movie, A Clockwork Orange. Haven’t read the novel yet.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      There’s a lot more in the novel that isn’t in the film.

      That said, the copy that Kubrick used to adapt into the film did not have the final chapter of the novel (it was an edited down American version) and it is such a better ending than the book.

  • A_A@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    After having thoroughly learned the language of their parents, around 8 or maybe 12 years old, children are good at learning languages and they play at doing better than their parents … inventing things … testing them.
    They want to know that they are good enough and to prove this to themselves they have to do better in some way than their parents.

  • Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    As a Gen-Z, I feel this divide is the result of our gen growing up on the internet and Gen-Alpha growing up in the internet. Like culturally I feel Gen-Z still had roots to reality hidden behind layers of absurdism and abstraction. Gen-Alpha however feels like it’s generating new cultural landmarks with no connections to reality.

    Like, skibidi was absurdist humor, which is now being covered by absurdist layers. It’s absurdism all the way down! It’s like some twisted form of enlightenment. To clarify I don’t say this in a necessarily negative light, I just think it’s interesting from the viewpoint of our species as a whole.

    I know Gen-Z was experiencing a stage of wanting to assert real connections to the world against algorithmic forces, before covid that is, now I think we’re a little scattered again.

    • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I was thinking about this last night because I saw this meme and felt like it was very “boomer humor” which got me thinking about how humor has seemingly changed throughout the years.

      It does seem absurdism is much more common nowadays, however it’s not just that either, there’s layers of nuance usually that makes it “deeper” as well.

      Would be interesting to see a deep dive on how humor has evolved through the years aside from my biases. You make an interesting point about it being “no connections to reality” but I’m not sure it’s entirely correct.

    • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I wouldn’t worry too much about the ranting of an out-of-touch opinion writer caught in a moral panic.

      They’re just annoyed that the world is changing around them. People have made the same complaint about literally every generation before.

  • Phegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Every generation has this article published about them, congratulations, you are officially old and out of touch.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        The primary difference is that the slang ends up born (and abandoned) on the national and international levels, whereas in times past slang would become lodged in the regional vernacular first, and some of it would never move ‘up’ to replace old slang. In a sense, then, there was more slang in days past - it just was less ‘standardized’.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I kinda get that. We called anime “Japanimation” in the 80s. Nothing racist there for y’all haters, just what we called it. But you’re right, never heard that term outside my local group.

  • Phegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Dividing us into generations is a way to make us feel segmented and separated. The concept of generations is made up, we shouldn’t feel tribal about the era we were born in.