35 crypto companies got together to make a change dot org petition called “Bitcoin Deserves an Emoji”.

F that

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Maybe we don’t need a Bitcoin emoji, but we absolutely need a Doge emoji.

  • magic_lobster_party@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    We also need a McDonald’s emoji, Pepsi emoji, Windows emoji and Mastercard emoji. These are also brands that are heavily ingrained in our culture. Probably even more so than Bitcoin.

    Or we accept that brands like Bitcoin shouldn’t use emoji as a marketing tool.

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Bitcoin is digital money. A better analogy would be to campaign for a USD, Yen, euro or British pound emoji.

      Oh wait, they already exist.

    • deafboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      We also need a McDonald’s emoji, Pepsi emoji, Windows emoji and Mastercard emoji

      bitcoin is not a company.

      • magic_lobster_party@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Unicode Consortium decide which emoji should be included. It’s up to each vendor themselves to come up with how they should look like. I don’t think Unicode Consortium explicitly state it must look like McDonald’s fries.

      • magic_lobster_party@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        The logo and name is the brand. How do you visually represent a specific payment protocol without using its logo? There’s no emoji for HTTP or TCP either.

        • deathbird@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’m actually for the idea of emojis for protocols. Not Bitcoin specifically because I don’t think it has long term potential as a deflationary virual asset, but block chain? Sure.

        • KⒶMⒶLⒶ WⒶLZ 2Ⓐ24@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          while there may not be an emoji for http, maybe there should be. there is sort of an unofficial one (a broken lock), and there are other protocols that have logos. as another commenter said, it’s kind of silly to fight for an emojii for it, and probably sillier to fight against it.

          • Emerald@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            while there may not be an emoji for http, maybe there should be.

            No God, Please No!

            We don’t need another gzip or bzip2 logo. Lol

    • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Since when is Bitcoin a brand lmao? I’m really struggling to see how it is comparable to McDonald’s or Windows. Having a logo does not make you a corporation

            • Mubelotix@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              You think you can fool people by using a simple straw man argument technique? Come on, get your shit together. Bitcoin is infrastructure as anyone can submit transactions to the network and they will be seamlessly processed. As simple as that

              • RxBrad@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                I know that shouting “straw man!” is the first step of trying to deflect from being wrong on the Internet… But if you’re going to do it, at least know what a straw man is.

                My argument is that “Infrastructure” != “anyone can do it”.

                Infrastructure is something that benefits and maintains the general public. Bitcoin benefits a handful of cryptobros, billionaires… and most importantly ransomware rings.

                • Mubelotix@jlai.lu
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  Your straw man is “shit in their pants”

                  Read your own comments dude

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Probably even more so

      probably? shitcoin isn’t even in the same ballpark universe as something like McDonald’s or Pepsi.

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Yeah McDonalds is based on torturing and murdering animals while destroying the planet… While bitcoin is only destroying the planet like the rest of capitalism.

  • lemmytellyousomething@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Short reminder that Bitcoin was created as a reaction on the wirld finance crisis and to allow people like Assange to receive donations, because PayPal and similar just blocked them…

    That does not mean that Botcoin is perfect, but: If the alternative system was perfect, there was not bitcoin.

    Now, do we need an emoji? I don’t care TBH…

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t mind a system like bitcoin existing but bitcoin itself has way too many problems to be useful and actually is detrimental to the environment. It takes way too long to process a transaction, it is massively energy intensive for what it is, and it’s been hyped up like the Californian gold Rush.

      Sure it was created to solve a problem but it doesn’t actually solve that problem very effectively. It also introduces an infinite number of new problems that no other currency system has ever experienced.

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        It also introduces an infinite number of new problems that no other currency system has ever experienced.

        Infinite problems, eh? Can you name like 10?

    • smeeps@lemmy.mtate.me.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Bitcoin is terrible for that though. High transaction fees, slow transaction speeds, everyone can see your balances and transactions (and with KYC requirements it’s very easy to link a wallet and a coin to a person).

      Monero is the only digital currency worth having.

    • smallpatatas@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      This is like saying “laws aren’t always enforced equally, so we should have no laws whatsoever”. Bitcoin is not a helpful response.

      • lemmytellyousomething@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think, whether it’s helpful is an individual decision. E.g. for people in Turkey, it’s a lot more stable than their own currency. Same logic for probably dozens of other countries…

        Maybe, it’s not useful for you, but that’s OK. No one is trying to replace your currency with it and force you to use it.

        • smallpatatas@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Bitcoin’s “value” in USD terms has dropped ~20% in the last few days, so I’m not sure we can call it ‘stable’

          • iopq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            In 1998 the USD fell like 20% vs the yen, currencies don’t always stay the same value vs. other currencies

            • smallpatatas@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              Bitcoin regularly loses 85% of its “value” vs USD

              85%

              This has happened multiple times

              • iopq@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                The swings were bigger when the market cap was smaller, this is usually the case. The market cap of the yen is much bigger still.

                • smallpatatas@lemm.eeOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Turns out you’re right, BTC price only went down 77% from the 2021 peak, my mistake /s

              • lemmytellyousomething@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Turkey’s currency dropped 83% in the last 5 years and 94% in 10 years (per USD). And by the way: It dropped and did not rise the same amount ever again…

                Why can’t we just agree that different people might have different views whether it’s useful for them?

                Is it more stable compared to USD? No. Is it more stable compared to dozens of other currencies? Yes.

                I think, there are very good arguments against BTC, for example the energy consunption… But whether it’s too risky for you or not… That’s highly subjective IMO. There is no country on this planet with only BTC as official currency. So, no one is forced to hold 100% of their total money in BTC.

                • smallpatatas@lemm.eeOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  So the argument is no longer “Bitcoin provides stability” or whatever, but instead is, “it’s no more unstable than the world’s most unstable national currency”?

  • quinkin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Should just be a generic crypto currency symbol with a rub being pulled from under it.

  • nublug@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    fighting for bitcoin to get an emoji is stupid, but fighting against it might be even stupider. surely there are more important things to spend your time and energy on. it’s a fucking emoji. who cares?

    • reksas@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      millions of people who use emojis would constantly see it. It would slowly start to feel more familiar to them and increase its acceptance. If that works, others would try to do the same and we would have every and any company put their logos in. If it doesnt then it doesnt matter that much, but i dont want to risk yet another avenue for corporations to worm into peoples minds.

      Personally i dont care about emojis at all but i do care about general mentalspace.

    • smallpatatas@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      normalizing scams, by laundering their image via standards organizations, pollutes our communications environment. Both an emoji and a petition are symbolic - and our symbols are in fact important.

      • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Bitcoin isn’t a scam. All non-bitcoin cryptocurrencies are scams.

        People often hear about stuff like coins that are pre-mined, or proof-of-stake and the schemes and scans that come out of those, and immediately associate Bitcoin with the same thing.

        • glassware@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Of course bitcoin is a scam. It’s a “currency” you can’t spend anywhere. It’s only purpose is a pump and dump scheme for early adopters.

          • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            It’s a “currency” you can’t spend anywhere

            Lol

            It’s only purpose is a pump and dump scheme for early adopters.

            This is exactly what many alt-coins are but Bitcoin is decidedly not.

            You’re confusing “easy to mine” with “early adopter scam”.

          • 0x0@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            It’s a “currency” you can’t spend anywhere.

            You could’ve at least pretended to have done some basic research…

        • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          That is also not 100% true. There are several altcoins with fantastic utility. Monero and Ethereum come to mind.

          • Mubelotix@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Ethereum has scam characteristics though. The creator Vitalik gave himself time to mine it alone before giving public access. He secured for himself quite a nice stash

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Exactly. Most cryptocurrencies are scams, but a handful are fantastic. Ethereum is cool for being proof-of-stake (so no high-energy mining), and Monero is cool for being super privacy-oriented. There are a handful more, but honestly, if you stick with Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Monero, you’ll be fine.

            • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              That’s pretty much exactly my thought. I hold a very very small amount in Polygon, but only in order to pay the gas fees for the Polygon network. So I never have more than a few US dollars worth in it at a time.

              • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Yeah, I basically just do Monero, and I use it as a spend account and use it anywhere it’s accepted. I don’t invest in any cryptocurrencies because I don’t think cryptocurrencies have positive expected return (it’s all hype), so I keep the amount of crypto I have small.

    • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      We have an established tradition to represent sexual characteristics with fruit. 🍆, 🍑, 🍈 🍈.

      To be fair, I whenever I go to market and see the eggplants, I feel inadequate. Also in the last decade many of the more classical substitutes have emerged in the emoji library. 🌶️, 🥒, 🥚🥚, 🌮, 🍪, 🎂, 🎃🎃

    • AlwaysTheir@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I agree but I’m not sure BTC fit the definition of proprietary money I’m finding online. How does BTC qualify in your opinion?

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    It was a mistake that the Unicode people started to add emoji of their own at all ever in the first place.

    My understanding is that emoji were originally added because they existed in other preexisting standards. They should have kept it at that. Now we get public discussions what concepts are important enough to “deserve” emoji, which is a stupid, pointless discussion that could have been avoided if they had not started doing that. We were able to communicate just fine before emoji were a thing.