• peopleproblems@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Y’all gonna get real sick of me, but I dont think it matters, even if she does win it.

    If anything, this will supercharge the racist bigots into political violence. I hope to God they aren’t numerous enough to cause any serious damage, but Jan 6 is all the evidence we need to see just how horrible MAGAts are.

    I will vote Kamala. I will start spreading the news, and get everyone I can behind her. Because it’s anyone vs a Nazi. We don’t have a choice. The Nazis must not come back to power.

  • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Last night I was reading an article where they quoted his family, “Don’t they know he’s Irish?”. And I was like shoot I guess he’s not dropping out. 🤯

  • callouscomic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    If he was gonna do this, why not announce it a year ago? Idiotic lack of political savvy. RBG levels of idiocy clinging to your post and ignoring the greater good.

    I love the chaos. Everyone can now have a candidate they didn’t really ever vote for, and it’ll be appalling if THIS is the way we finally get the first woman president.

  • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    This just shows that both political parties in ameria are insane. The dems just gift Trump the office. They deserve the 2nd Trump term. Just sad for the rest of the world that doesnt deserve it.

  • Veneroso@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    K-Hive is ready baby!

    Buzz buzz buzz buzz buzz buzz buzz buzz buzz buzz buzz buzz buzz buzz buzz buzz buzz buzz buzz buzz

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I kind of expected them to announce another candidate, not just that their only candidate wouldn’t be. Do they have to elect a candidate now? For how long will only one party have a candidate?

    • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      The media loves conflict, and this is going to be a juicy one. If anyhting, this sucks the wind out of Trump’s campaign.

      Its still going to be “dems in disarray” non stop until they pick someone, but it mutes that chucklefuck up.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Biden has already endorsed Harris, at least on Twitter. I think that part is over. They already have to nominate someone early due to some deadlines, so the actual nomination will happen in the next week or two. It’s Harris. We should all accept it.

      • harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Goddamn this timeline sucks hairy balls (not to be confused with me cuz ain’t nobody sucking me). I didn’t like her as a VP pick and I don’t like the idea of her as President but she’s still 1000 times better than Cheetodick.

        I’d love to see them nominate Bernie or AOC for VP. That’s how they’ll get the 18-24 year olds to come out to vote.

        • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          18-24 year olds didn’t show up for Bernie in 2015 or 2019. They aren’t coming this time. Their enthusiasm always get way overestimated.

          • 5redie8@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Probably because that’s one of the primary demos of sites like Lemmy and reddit, plus some sub populations of Twitter

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    After the Schumer leak, this had to happen.

    It has to be Kamala and anyone thinking otherwise is dumb.

    And I don’t know if Kamala can win. I don’t know if she could do better than Joe would do. But I know she’ll do better than what would happen if Joe had a second debate like the first debate.

    If nothing else, this keeps it close.

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    My money is still on Harris to be the final candidate. Get ready.

      • AlbertSpangler@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Anyone will get demoed (?) by drumpf and the GOP.

        They’ll probably claim whoever gets the nomination wasn’t born in the US, is part of a satanic paedophilic cabal, etc etc etc.

        So that bit doesn’t matter. Get someone who ideally inspires the swing states and hesitant voters.

        Then there’ll be a violent uprising with the support of the supreme court, but again there’s nothing you can do to prevent that now.

      • felbane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        One of the things Harris really has going for her is the fact that she would absolutely demolish Trump in a debate. She would not let him off the hook for his lies and would be able to counter his BS with reality.

        Which is why Trump will never agree to debate her.

        If Harris does become first name on the ticket, they better put Jesus Himself Christ as her running mate.

        • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          What makes you think she could do that? Honest question. The few speeches I heard from her she performed poorly.

          • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            She’s great on attack, she just gets tongue tied on defense sometimes. Before the primary (where she had some good attacks), she was most known for questioning people in the senate.

          • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            She was a prosecutor. Trump is a rambling tank of lies. She is smart enough to predict his bullshit and have responses in the can. I would love to see someone call Trump a liar to his face constantly for an hour.

        • Grimy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          If Harris does become first name on the ticket, they better put Jesus Himself Christ as her running mate.

          GOP: Holy shit, why didn’t we think of that?

          • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Put a woke commie pacifist on the ticket? Hah! Now, Supply-Side Jesus, that’s a candidate.

          • mashbooq@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            They probably did think of it but then rejected it when they found out how progressive Jesus is

        • MaXimus421@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          You cannot be serious. She’s as bad at public speaking as Biden during the last debate. She absolutely would not stand a chance in a debate with Trump.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Having the first US woman president would be cool. And maybe the first woman vice-president as well, why not?

      • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Running a woman for president is risky because of boomers, but the majority of them are voting Trump anyway. Running two women on the ticket I think would be a mistake. There are a lot of progressives that are still misogynist. As much as I’d love to see Harris/AOC I think they need to pick a man for VP.

        • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Nobody voted for Biden because Kamala was the VP. Get real man, accept reality. Yes she might be better than Biden at this point but the only way she wins this is if she beats trump in a debate and based on her speaking skills in the few speeches I heard from her she will look like a moron on stage compared to him.

    • Corigan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I am all for a women president, but Harris is just a Hilary repeat … Please dont.

      AOC would be amazing but I know shes "too progressive"for the boomers… What ever the fuck that means

      • iz_ok@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I like AOC’s passion but a lot of people believe she’s too progressive. She’s young and can probably be more beneficial to her constituents and the party where she is for a few more years.

        Harris should have a good shot, just for name recognition, her stance on abortion, and being part of the incumbent administration. Maybe she’s a more likable candidate then she was four years ago. The Democrats will have to give her a chance.

        • chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Because that is the talking point that the foreign propaganda machine has been pumping out for the last few months. You’ll notice there were no comparisons to Hillary a year ago. Now it’s all “Harris is a cop,” and “Harris is Hillary 2.0”. Ignore all of that bullshit. It’s foreign trolls doing their job and muddying the waters.

          • Redecco@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            I feel like I heard that stuff during the 2020 primaries as well, but the spotlight has definitely shifted back on her so we’ll be hearing all sorts of things.

            • chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Exactly. If it were a real issue, it would be important enough to talk about all the time. When it only comes up if she is in the spotlight, it’s a disinformation campaign.

        • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          The thought is that her years as a prosecutor will come back to bite her. Plus a lot of people seem to have a problem with her personality.

          I haven’t watched her enough to form an opinion but those are the takes I’ve heard most often.

            • vxx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              If that’s the spin republicans will take on her, they’ll alienate their own voters and push them democratic.

            • kandoh@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              She’s a democrat so the average voter is totally incapable of identifying that they could be anything but pro minority and soft on crime.

              It’s like pointing out that republicans keep crashing the economy, doesn’t matter, they’re branding is still ‘good for business’

            • The_Terrible_Humbaba@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              I don’t know much about her, but directly from the wiki:

              The rate at which Harris’s office prosecuted marijuana crimes was higher than the rate under Hallinan, but the number of defendants sentenced to state prison for such offenses was substantially lower.[76] Prosecutions for low-level marijuana offenses were rare under Harris, and her office had a policy of not pursuing jail time for marijuana possession offenses.[76]

              It sounds like her position on weed is not exactly what people are painting it as. At least these comments make it seem much worse than it is according to the wiki.

        • enbyecho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Why is she Hillary repeat?

          They don’t know. Watch… they won’t have specific factual reasons, only vague generalizations. Betcha.

            • CliveRosfield@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago
              1. Chosen because of her gender before her merit. Evidence: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/03/15/biden-woman-vice-president-131309

              2. She ran for president previously and lost terribly because people didn’t like her. She is not well spoken because clearly people didn’t resonate with her, women included.

              3. When she loses, and I assure you she will, it’s not because she’s a woman. It all comes down to her track record and how charismatic she is, both which are bad.

              4. Let’s not forget she backs Biden so things that the left is against, such as her and Biden sending bombs to Israel will hurt her terribly.

              5. I’m probably voting for her, but it leaves a disgusting taste in my mouth stomaching it. I’m able to accept that I won’t have a perfect candidate but most Americans aren’t these days so it’s a loss for her, yeah.

      • Kroxx@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I do not like Hillary and I do not like Harris. I don’t however agree with harris being a Hilary repeat, I think she has a way better shot than Biden did

      • oyo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Have you actually listened to her on the issues or do you just know what the media has been spouting? I was surprised to hear her very articulate and reasonable stances from her directly rather than through a progressive media filter. There’s a mismatch.

        • 5redie8@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          To each their own, but when I watched her in the debate years back I only remember her as one of the people I explicitly didn’t like lol. Whatever, there’s some good points in this thread and I dearly hope they’re right.

      • dank@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Progressives aren’t going to get a candidate we like this year. And you know what, that’s ok. I wasn’t going to vote for Genocide Joe, but I’ll do everything in my power to put in office Harris, Newsom, Whitmer, or whoever else milquetoast neolib gets the establishment nod, if only to prevent Trump from taking office.

        • Nastybutler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I wasn’t going to vote for Genocide Joe

          Thanks for letting us know you’d rather have an autocratic despot run this country than Biden

  • fubarx@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The biggest hot-topic issue this election should have been abortion (and by extension, SCOTUS). But the discussion got side-tracked by all this talk of old age. The debate just reinforced the narrative and concern with Biden. They would have hammered him over and over, with Trump bragging about how quickly he recovered from an injury.

    Now, we have:

    • A sittingVP with actual Whitehouse experience, who can take credit for all the economic policies under Biden. Also, a former Senator.
    • A prosecutor and former Attorney General vs a convicted felon.
    • The age issue disappears (in fact, it now becomes a liability against Trump).
    • A woman vs the guy who bragged about killing Roe v. Wade.
    • Future of SCOTUS.

    If she just keeps talking about those topics non-stop, she’ll do fine.

    The only thing better would have been if Biden had resigned to let people see her in the actual role, but this works. She picks a mid-westerner as VP who can stand up to Vance and it’s a whole new ballgame.

    I’m actually stoked about this race again.

  • Sarothazrom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Definitely should have happened 6 months ago, but better late than never - something about planting a tree.

    This also robs the GOP of the hE’s ToO oLd argument, which is one of their only effective attacks.

  • samus12345@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m nervous. Biden was a flawed candidate, but he already beat Trump once and had the incumbent advantage. Harris was a very unpopular candidate in 2020, and it’s unknown if any other candidate will do better against Trump. But since Biden chose to do this, there’s no doubt he made the right decision for him.