• Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    We’re so fucked it’s absolutely insane.

    I thought Trump had a chance before, but now… My god Biden embarrassed the shit out of himself… Fuck the goddamn DNC for condemning us by REFUSING to have primaries… Yeah it’s the tradition because usually the incumbent has a chance, but 90472828 year old Biden? Ffs…

    Yes Trump is old too but it was plain as day how much more lucid trump is than biden…

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Does it really count as “lucid” if you enunciate your lies, fabrications, misrecollections about… everything?

      • Revonult@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        For his voters, his lies and fabrications are the truth. They don’t listen to fact checking because they are conditioned to see it as fake and a goverment ploy to fool them.

        • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          True. But they were going to have the same criticism of Biden regardless.

          It’s part of the reason I didn’t even watch. Looking over the polling, the debate didn’t really change anyone’s opinions on anything to any significant degree.

          • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            What the polling likely isn’t capturing is how many people will ultimately choose not to vote out of despair, and that was the real threat the whole time.

            • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Oh, definitely. Not just possible, they weren’t even looking for that. They were entirely looking for what the debate did to preferences and opinions directly about the candidates.

              I mostly brought it out as an example of the headline not capturing the whole message of how it impacted voters. Or didn’t impact, rather.

          • Asafum@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            I don’t think it has been long enough to have gathered enough data on that. Just watching it myself I could clearly see a low information voter seeing Trump as a more fit choice as Biden struggled to even form sentences :(

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        It was a goddamn travesty that there was no fact checking by the button pushers moderators.

        Everything was allowed to stand as fact. It was disgusting :(

    • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I see so many people screaming that primaries should have been held, especially today.

      Biden would have easily won the primaries.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        The only reason I agree with this is that I was still living in the Midwest during the 2016 primary. I moved to California during August of that year. Time after time, I got told by Midwestern democrats that Bernie just wasn’t electable / was too progressive. The coasts would have primaried Biden, but flyover country would have messed it up.

            • Asafum@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              NY isn’t that keen on progressive politics outside NYC. Long Island is an extremely populated part of NY and it’s basically Trumpland and “moderates” out here, more Trump the more east you go. “Greater” NY is also pretty red aside from the larger cities. It doesn’t really surprise me that much unfortunately :(

          • PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            The problem with Biden is they gave it to him because “he deserved it”. Life long politician. Vice president. That’s the only real reason the DNC handed the keys to him. It’s a fucking job promotion.

            The next election cycle is going to be interesting.

    • Mzpip@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yes Trump is old too but it was plain as day how much more lucid trump is than biden…

      And also an unrepentant crook and liar. Who also dreams of being a dictator and getting revenge on his “enemies”.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Preaching to the choir, but I’m worried about the ignorant people that simply don’t know that about him. All they see is an old bumbling feeble man vs a “strong man.” :(

        • Mzpip@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          And unfortunately, the media is not informing people. I can’t believe there was no question last night about Project 2025. Just unbelievable.

          Plus no fact checkers. Again, unbelievable.

    • pancakes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      This might be a hot take but any leadership selection where candidates are ranked in terms of how lucid they are is a bad time for all involved.

  • dumbass@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Nope, you can’t stand there for generations going “LOOK AT ME! LOOK AT ME!” Then get shitty when we do, we want to watch you drive that burning bus into the the ocean.

  • JATth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    A dum question: if both candidates are unable to function, then what happens? (Trump for his crimes, Biden for getting dementia…)

    Meanwhile in Finland: the Finnish version of “build the wall”:

    Parliament’s Administrative Committee will not resume its discussion of the Refoulement Act until after the weekend. The committee is still so far behind schedule that it could not complete its work today. The debate on the bill continued during the committee meeting, which started at 5 p.m. but ended quickly. Peltokangas says there was no drama at the meeting. https://yle.fi/uutiset/lyhyesti/74-20097017

    The bill needs 5/6 parliamentary approval and politicians are already sweating over it because it touches too many international treaties + constitution. Debate is mostly: is it ready yet? is it ready yet? is it ready yet? (While the committees checking the bill are getting more uneasy by the bill’s content…)

    • justaderp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      If it’s after they’re elected then it’ll run down the line of succession: VP, Speaker of the House, president pro tempore of the Senate, then the cabinet.

      If it’s before they’re elected, I’m no expert but I believe the Democratic and Republican parties are private organizations that can do whatever the fuck they want, even fail to abide by the results of their own primaries.

    • Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Checked out the Refoulement Act and it looks ugly, I wish you good luck over there with your own government

  • rsuri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The crazy thing is everything up to this point was so much better. They’d show biden waiving at “nobody” and then they’d zoom out and there’s someone standing there. Or he’d say “president of Mexico” when he meant to say “president of Egypt”. But then last night was like nonstop fail. It’s the perfect nightmare scenario because now everyone can say “You shoulda seen it sooner!” but really, we couldn’t.

    • stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Sounds like an excuse.

      What I mean is: it sounds like his handlers kept making excuses and you kept accepting them because you wanted to believe them.

      I know, I’m frustrated too. I dismissed the Alex Jones Fox News crowd because they were known liars, they’d lied to us for decades, and this really did seem like standard conservative projection to deflect from their candidates’ obvious mental issues.

      Hate to admit it. But the conservatives were right and we were wrong.

      • justaderp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        We’ve seen this before with Reagan. We took the military industrial complex to the next level. If history repeats with banks deregulated as they are now… It won’t matter one fucking bit, really. It’s not very important whom they choose to front their cons. No President can save us, or would want to. Our oppressor is not our savior.

      • mhague@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I don’t see how what conservatives say has to do with reality.

        Biden has been “senile” and “too old” for years now, during which time we’ve had a functioning Biden administration.

        The Trump admin was limp, chronically understaffed, weak, ineffectual. That’s what they’re pretending is better than Biden. Conservatives don’t even care about senility so if you hear them rag on Biden and think they’re right, you’re not understanding what they’re really saying.

        • DogWater@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Don’t make the mistake of thinking the 1st trump term will be like the second if he wins. This time people are prepared and have a playbook to do as much damage as possible. Google project 2025.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        No, plenty of nonpartisan and even liberal people were yelling this too. I had no illusions of Biden’s age.

        America is not just two internet echo chambers… even if it feels like it right now.

    • Siegfried@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Well, i would have gone for slavery or genocide, but downing a financial building is probably the same from a POV.

      /s I’m just joking

  • uebquauntbez@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Yeah, you true. Get out the popcorn and watch USA go down either with a 3yo minded constant liar or a 80+yo laggard. And learn mandarin.

  • Annually2747@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Your family is in our neighbourhood and in this domestic dispute I’m just wondering if I need to call the police or the abundance.

    • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      In America, you can’t call just one—you’ll still get police if you ask for an ambulance.

      Source: am American, have tried calling for only an ambulance before.

      • Rev. Layle@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        We call an ambulance we get fire dept first responders, then an ambulance if you need it. Never got the police, and we have done it many times with my father in law with heart issues.

        … And I live in Tulsa

    • Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I say this as an American: maybe start making friends with the other countries because we are not gonna be okay whatever happens.

    • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m just wondering if I need to call the police or the ambulance

      Both? One of these guys is a convicted felon turned robber baron and the other is a retirement home escapee who has lost the light in their eyes.

  • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    No chance, I usually don’t care about American politics but I’m not gonna miss the chance to watch 2 geriatric fucks attempt to debate one another.

    It was so much worse than I envisioned it to be though. Like one guy seemed to make up literally everything with insane claims that were delivered with confidence only rivaled by how stupid they were and the other sounded like his brain turned to soup if he spoke for more than 5 seconds and when not speaking he looked like a frog seeing a very tasty fly on the wall.

    I really hope Europe can get our collective shit together and supply Ukraine once the US shits the bed there.

    • Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      one guy seemed to make up literally everything with insane claims that were delivered with confidence only rivaled by how stupid they were

      that’s exactly how he was_ when he was president from 2016-2020_. he tried to nuke a hurricane and buy greenland. his own party basically lets him say whatever dogshit he likes as a distraction while they engage in graft and tax evasion

  • Nicoleism101@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    At this point the only thing I care about are hordes of m1 abramses if putin crosses the border. I don’t have any other expectations or hopes.

    Trump was somewhat ironically right about paying for it. Because if that’s the only thing that America can offer to the world then better name a price for your single trick.

  • evranch@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    America needs some perspective. You complain that your only choices are a doddering fool or a toxic narcissist who wants to actively destroy the nation.

    Here in Canada we look at our options and think “America is so much better, I wish we had an option to vote for a doddering fool. All we have are narcissists”

    No joke I wish we had a leader as good as Biden. The bar is so low that the devil is doing the limbo with it down in Hell.

    • saigot@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      No I would definitely vote for trudeau a 100 times over before Biden, and we have at least 3 choices in almost every riding. We don’t have to worry about gerrymandering and voters reform while unlikely is at least a topic mainstream politicians will tall about.

      Comparing ourselves too much to the states is why canada is the mess it is, it’s still no contest with the states.

      • evranch@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Trudeau over Biden?

        Trudeau is importing the world’s problems in the name of propping up the real estate investor class (of which he is a member) and pumping up fake GDP numbers. GDP per capita is plummeting in Canada with excess immigration.

        Singh is in his pocket, a waste of a vote. I was an NDP voter all my life, I’m done.

        Polliviere is an absolute idiot who will ride a wave of hatred for Trudeau into office.

        Voters in Canada have no power and no representation as all votes are whipped. Your MP is a seat filler. We have no ballot initiatives or direct democracy options that America has, and reform will never come.

        Biden listens to people who know what they’re doing and stands out of the way… Passed legislation supporting workers and unions, energy infrastructure etc. meaning he’s both more left than Singh and more business-friendly than PP

        • saigot@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Well your clearly not here in good faith so I’ll keep it brief.

          Singh is in his pocket, a waste of a vote. I was an NDP voter all my life, I’m done.

          Sorry can’t hear you over the sound of my dentists drill.

          Polliviere is an absolute idiot who will ride a wave of hatred for Trudeau into office.

          Worse than Biden, probably, worse than Trump no way.

          Voters in Canada have no power and no representation as all votes are whipped. Your MP is a seat filler

          No I live in a green riding.

          • evranch@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            No I’m serious, I’m here in SK and we’re trying to push Moe and his cronies out for the NDP this fall, and our biggest problem is the federal NDP damaging the brand by backing Trudeau. All we say all day is “The SK NDP is not affiliated with the federal party, we stand for working Canadians, vote Moe out”

            If you think $500 for low income and seniors is anything other than a bone thrown to pacify the poor then Singh has pulled the wool over your eyes.

            The requirement for “no access to insurance” absolutely torpedoes the entire thing. Private insurers need to fall, universal coverage is the only way. Dental is the Canadian equivalent to the entire USA health insurance racket.

            Congrats on living in the one green riding, which does give you some power over your single seat party… Which ultimately holds no power at all in our broken system.

            I’m sorry to say I voted Trudeau on the promise of electoral reform, which he then told us we didn’t want. I’m in a safe blue riding which means my vote is pointless, so I’m going full protest vote next time for the PPC 🤣 Max is laughable, especially his obsession with dairy supply management, but enough votes for “burn it down” will hopefully send a message.

    • Klear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I mean, I follow the presidental race somewhat because it has global impact, but watching the debates is not worth my time, and I’m fairly certain it’s not worth anyone’s time, especially non-americans.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Plus it’s unlikely to change anyone’s mind. At this point you’re either pro or anti Trump and you’ve had at least eight years to pick your side.

              • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                They’re both right wing, but moderate right wing bought by corporate interests isn’t the same as fascist. It’s trending towards fascism, sure, but it’s less likely to go on a killing spree.

                • LordSinguloth@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  It’s obviously a common vernacular simplification from authoritarian with a broad definition. This is a commonplace and accepted vernacular in most modern western media based social media outlets.

                  Fascist can be liberal, they can also be conservative. Or communist. Or almost anything. More often fascists will lie and say they are more socialist than many of their policies would lead you to reasonably expect.

                  Grown ups are talking. Go play outside. You obviously need to touch grass, child.

            • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              It’s what modern elections are, and maybe even all historical elections, though I’m not old enough to determine that. What elections should be is throwing your support behind someone that you think is going to be beneficial for everyone. I know that is idealistic, and unfortunately the current system makes that basically impossible, but Washington said that partisan politics would be the downfall of this country, and his words are playing out in front of us. I really wish we would throw the parties, and lobbyists, out and force candidates to run on policy and merit.

              • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                See, you’re talking partisan politics, I’m talking “you literally have to pick someone”. We’ve had these candidates before. You already know which one you’re going to vote for. You picked your side four years ago when you were asked the same question.

                Beyond that though, there’s “parties” and then theirs “sides”. One side is xenophobic, homophobic and actively wishes harm on a lot of people. The other side doesn’t, for all their flaws.
                There are more parties than there are sides in the past few elections.

                By saying you think you should vote for someone who will be good for everyone, you’ve picked a side. The side that doesn’t want to do good for only the “right” people, or make sure only the “right” people get hurt.
                The only question is if you’ll vote for that side to win, or if you’ll let idealism or anger drive you to vote otherwise.

                • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  I shall, once again, for the 6th time in my life, hold my nose and vote for the milquetoast candidate the DNC has foisted on us. I wish we had RCV so I could vote for someone good, like Bernie, or heck I’d almost take Vermin Supreme at this point.

            • PopShark@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              A side as opposed to either side is how it should be. But don’t take my word for it, George Washington allegedly warned us of the potential perils of a two-party system on his deathbed but I’m unsure if that is common myth or actually true

              • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                George Washington eschewed political parties because he didn’t want to establish a precedent where his choice as first president set the standard everyone else had to conform to, and there’s a little irony in people holding him up as an example in that light more than 200 years later.

                He, and the other founders largely, disliked political parties in their entirety, not just having some specific number of them.
                They also built the system that enshrined the two party dichotomy as the only option, actively sought to ensure that the “right” people could override the will of the people if needed, and founded the parties they had previously argued against.
                They are far from infallible bastions of correctness in this matter.

      • trolololol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I came here to skip the debate and catch up with the jokes. But seems like the joke is the debate itself