• CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I’m worried about this one, especially from an AI safety perspective as LLMs become capable of preforming simple white-collar jobs, like those of managers and investors.

      Right now a rogue AI would have trouble getting going because human contact is expected in most important business transactions. However, it’s easy to imagine a world where most people are employed by opaque apps, which are run through proprietary servers. Then, all it would take is for some server on Wall Street to calculate that it could make more money if it does buybacks until it has a majority stake in itself, and contract out whatever it needs in meatspace to apps.

      I know, I know, it sounds like sci-fi, but it always does at first.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Having an internet connection, a proper AI can easily order contractors around and reproduce, secure and empower itself.

          I mean, that’s the standard idea guys like Yudowski talk about. Having poked around a bit, it seems a couple decades of petty hackers have made that pretty impossible to do without either leaving a meatspace paper trail, or having meatspace human accomplices. Conquering the world instantly by Wifi, unless you can break encryption, is probably overblown - for now.

          Otherwise, I just agree.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        OK, you got me there. For me, EMail-SPAM is still a new thing, because I still remember the time before.

        • scottywh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Lol… I remember the time before my friend…

          I’ve been employed in the technology industry for the last 27 years though and it definitely started before Y2K.

          • Treczoks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Well, I was not that far off. ‘Spamford’ Wallace founded “Cyber Promotions” on 1997. While there have been unsolicided emails even way before that, they had not been an issue: Whoever did them got a clue-by-four from the network community and that’s it. SPAM started to be a problem with ‘Spamford’ Wallace.

  • 𒉀TheGuyTM3𒉁@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    The generative AI’s that “creates” content. Just dumb black boxes remixing what you give them, overconfident and inaccurate, yet seen as the ultimate tools by people.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      They do create content, though, regardless of it you personally think they’re smart in the process of doing so. Like, there’s actual papers that are devoted to making sure.

  • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Full scale mass surveillance capitalism. Governments used to have to hire agents, dress them up, and have them bug peoples phones. Now they can just buy it in bulk. No warrent, no black site op, just cashing checks.

  • DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Social Media. Cancerous all of it. Psyops and psychological manipulation. If you studied psychology and sociology you would know there is a huge stage 4 cancer in society and it is social media.

      • tiramichu@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yes - by most definitions. It’s powered by user-generated content and is based on interaction between users through engagement with that content, which is voted and scored.

        There is a difference which I personally feel makes reddit less harmful than other social media, however, which is the algorithm - or lack of it.

        In most social media, the algorithm exists to continually serve people the exact content they engage with in a constant feed, which is IMO the most socially damaging part of social media because it creates endless doomscrolling, toxic echo chambers, promotion of sponsored contebt and a whole raft of psychological problems in users.

        The Lemmy homefeed is more organic, and scrolling through ‘all’ you see content genuinely from everywhere, in a less curated way based on upvotes, not individual algorithmic tailoring. And that’s maybe not as “engaging” but it’s far less damaging.

    • ours@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Post-WWII put propaganda/advertising to the next level. Social media turned that to 11.

    • mholiv@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I can type faster on my keyboard free phone then I could with my old phone with a qwertz keyboard.

      Plus when I’m not typing I get more screen real estate. It’s a total win win for me. Not bad at all.

      • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Good for you. My sausage fingers mean I have to use swipe motions more often than not, and often the word will be wrong, then I have to backspace and type it letter by letter, sometimes getting it right, often getting some letters wrong.

        Autocorrect means trying anything akin to programming, or typing commands in a terminal emulator is an exercise in patience. “Just turn it off” - see sausage fingers problem

        • mholiv@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’m sorry. I can see how someone with very thick fingers might struggle.

          My father has a similar issue. I watched him write a message on his phone and I think I found the issue with him. He cared very much about the accuracy of each letter. Doing so made him slow and caused a lot of unhappiness.

          My advice to him was to stop caring and just trust autocorrect. It will autocorrect away mistakes and enables people to write quickly. But if you try to get everything letter perfect as you go there is no point to it. It’s a different mindset.

          As for programming yah I understand the discomfort here too. I slow down a bit when at the command line on my phone too. Particularly with the flags and such. I recommend the fish shell though. It has an amazing autocomplete set of features above and beyond even zsh. It’s not just looking at histories. It looks at man files and gives autocomplete recommendations. Just Ctrl-F to complete.

          As for programming, I have to ask, do you program on your phone? I would use my laptop here.

      • namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        But what’s the error rate? I could type at 200 words per minute (even on a phone!!) if I didn’t care about how many typos I was making. And swiping keyboards get confused incredibly easily. The error rates are especially bad when you’re writing words that only use a single row of keys - on QWERTY keyboards for example, try writing something like “type”, and you could get that, or you might get something else, like wipe/write/ripe. Other groups could include things like tip/top, pit/pot, wit/wire and the selected word will be wrong almost as frequently as it’s right. And autocorrect systems can’t really correct for things like when you mean to press enter and hit the backspace key instead. Plus, their suggestions are generally just very stupid. So while buttons take longer to press on physical keyboards, the reduced error rate makes typing speed about the same in my experience.

        Plus, with physical buttons, you get tactile feedback, so you can tell when your fingers are slightly off and adjust them, whereas on a flat surface, you have no idea whether you pressed the correct button or not. You have to stare straight at the screen to make sure every press is correct, which is exhausting and bad for your eyesight. I feel a lot more eyestrain from simply typing on phones, whereas with physical buttons, I didn’t even have to look at the screen, and I could look at something else around me while typing. And don’t get me started on how many calls I’ve missed because I accidentally hit the hang-up button, or couldn’t find the accept call button - not a problem when you have physical buttons!

        Regarding screen real estate, all you need is a slide-out keyboard. They work great!

        There are a few downsides to physical keyboards, but in my experience, they’re far superior to non-keyboard devices. But what can you do - in the 21st century, practicality never matters, it’s just all about aesthetics and nothing else…

        • mholiv@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          My “raw” error rate is quite high. My actual output error are is quite low. I can’t speak for swipe keyboards though. I just use the standard tap keyboard. For me the in context predictive autocorrect works wonders.

          With my old keyboard phone things were slower because I had to press down on physical buttons. With a touch keyboard I just lightly touch type without the need for effort or rechecking. It all just works out.

          As for me I could never go back to a slide out setup. It was very klutzy and thick. Like 2cm thick. Crazy.

          I’m happy with touch keyboards because they are faster for me and enable things like folding phones. But to each their own.

          Thanks for showing me how passionate you are here. :)

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Eh. The nice thing about a soft keyboard is that it can be anything you want, including more display real estate. It’s not as nice but it seems like an advance overall to me.

      Also, why the Roblox hate? I never actually played.

      • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Roblox is what zuckerfuck wish his metaverse could become. Millions of kids playing, another thousands working effectively for free to create content, and the very few that actually find success see that getting any money out of Roblox and into their bank accounts is hard as hell and comes with exorbitant taxes.

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_gXlauRB1EQ -> Video is almost 3 years old, but I doubt Roblox got better for developers in any capacity.

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6PYj93SGxc -> Essentially the same thing as above, but from September 2023, with some numbers updated, like the CEO saying they made “over 100 million dollars of cash in Q1” (2023), the place having over 50 million games, and more.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I see. Thanks.

          Edit: Holy crap, yeah that’s scummy. Literally manipulating children - openly, specifically children - into being whales without even knowing.

          Somehow, none of the “think of the children people” care or talk about this.

  • Geek_King@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I also second social media, but I need to make another suggestion it’d be Keurigs k-cups. So much plastic waste for the barest level of convenience.

      • Geek_King@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s a small plastic cup full of ground coffee, Kuerig machines use them. They generated a ton of plastic waste, since each k-cup was a single use.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          And so is every Coke bottle with 5 times the plastic. And so is every store-bought coffee. Yet… silence. 🦗🦗🦗

          What about bottles? Far more energy requires to melt and pour glass. No one says a word about single use.

          Never found a K-cup on the beach or trail, but I pack plastic bags to haul trash and sometimes load 2 or 3.

          • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Yet… silence.

            Imagine never reading any news or discussions about environmental impact, but coming in here trying to defend Keurig by doing full whataboutism.

        • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          There was great progress in compostable K-Cups from other vendors. And then Keurig did the DRM thing with the UV ink. So they literally made everything worse trying to keep their market reach.

          I threw mine out and went back to a french press. Straight into compost, and the coffee tastes better.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yes, it’s a waste, but the whole thing was blown way the hell out of proportion.

      I hike, kayak, canoe, whatever, all over the place. Every plastic bottle I pick up contains, what, 5 times the plastic? I pick up a LOT. And nobody thinks twice or raises a fuss.

      We use a Keurig, but either with plastic refill cups or paper bags my wife brings home from the hotel.

      • AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        To be used in most recycling programs you would need to fully remove the foil lid, and rinse out every k-cup before depositing them in recycling.

      • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        A lot of stuff marked as recyclable is technically recyclable but cost prohibitive to do so. I don’t know what type of plastic these cups are, but when they claim recyclable, it should specify percent actually being recycled.

        I’m liking aldi at the moment. They list all the separate parts of packaging for me and how it can be disposed. I hope its just a step to moving more to biodegradable rather than recyclable.

          • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Again, possible to recycle does not mean they are actually recycled or economic to recycle. Many things are possible to recycle. Most are not. If their form factor or material makes them costly to recycle, they wont be. You say they are cheap. What cost to make new? What cost to collect, sort and recycle?

            100% biodegradable would be better. With no plastic.

    • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Keurigs are actually pretty convenient when you’re only making one cup. The trick is to get one of the reusable filters and just use whatever coffee you like.

    • DaCrazyJamez@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Strong dissagree. I am barely functional pre-caffeine in the early morning. A Keurig is about as much mental energy as I can muster to operate. It is a godsend to me on day I work early.

      • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think the problem is not in pod-based single-serving coffee machines. Those are common, and well-loved for a reason.

        But there are easily available alternatives that do the exact same thing without requiring so much plastic, namely Senseo coffee pads (they’re grounds in coffee filter paper) or CoffeeB and its compressed coffee grounds balls (so it’s all just coffee ground, both the coffee and the pod). Probably a fair few more I don’t know about personally.

        Possibly even Nestle with their Nescafe pods. They’re aluminium but some countries achieve effectively 100% recycling on that, then the only issue is the filter membrane they place inside and I don’t know whether that is easily separated during recycling or not.

        • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Actually, the inventor of the Keurig coffee pod system, John Sylvan, sold his ownership of the product for $50,000 in 1997. 7 years after founding the company and before single-serve coffee really took off.

    • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Thank you for beating me to mention this.

      K-cups are really amazinlgy bad. And it’s not like there aren’t much better solutions available. Philips has those fully bio-degradable pads, a local store now sells a type of coffee maker that uses just the coffee powder in balls where the outer shell is compressed grounds that is cracked open to get to the powder inside.

      But no, Keurig and their fucking oceans of plastic waste.

  • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Facial recognition technology. Not only is it not as perfect as people claim in identifying people, but some countries are using it to attack the LGBT since it was discovered the LGBT have different variances in facial features. And yet that’s not even 100% perfect, so now you have a bad technology for a negative purpose repurposed into another negative purpose that it’s causing collateral damage with because it’s as awful at that as the first thing.

    • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Just pointing out I read that whole article and there was nothing in it to suggest that any countries are using it to attack LGBT people

      Dunno why you linked it instead of something more relevant

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      They’re good if you need a vehicle that sits high and has a cargo capacity similar to a truck with a little more efficiency instead of torque.

      • Ziggurat@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        But being high make them incredibly dangerous for other road users. If a normal car hits you, you break your leg, it sucks, but within a month you’d walk on crutches and within 6 month you’d be fine. A SUV hitting a pedestrian or a cyclist will break their pelvis or even their back which has a harder recovery and long lasting consequences.

        These stuff should be banned

      • ch00f@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        need a vehicle that sits high

        Why does anybody need a vehicle that “sits high”?

        • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Elderly people and people with certain disabilities can have difficulty entering and exiting low vehicle seats.

        • Fosheze@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Because you need to handle terrain other than a clear road. When you live somewhere that regularly gets a foot of snow overnight then having a bit of extra ground clearance is a must for navigating that. You also want a bit of extra ground clearance if you need to go off road regularly. The last thing anyone wants is to be out in the boonies and crack their oil pan on a tree stump or something.

          Of course, far more people buy SUVs and trucks than actually need them. Also lite trucks would have been the better solution for most people who do actually need them if the EPA hadn’t killed them with poorly written standards. With the current wheelbase based efficiency requirements we’re left with the choice between sedans that drag the undercarriage on residential speedbumps or a Landbarge 9000 toddler slaughter special with worse sight lines than an abrams tank and the (lack of) fuel efficiency to match.

          • shalafi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            the EPA hadn’t killed them with poorly written standards

            Thank you! I see so many people blaming the manufacturers for greed. No, the EPA killed the small truck. Perfect example of well-meaning laws paving the road to hell.