By greatest invention I mean something that had big and positive influence.

  • efstajas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I gotta say mRNA vaccines. It’s not technically a 21st century invention, but much of the work to make them viable started in the early 2000s. The speed at which the COVID vaccine got developed and widely deployed was honestly incredible and a massive W for humanity. I remember thinking a vaccine would be years away.

  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Sodium-ion batteries are likely to be the obvious answer in another decade. Dirt cheap, abundant materials, competitive density.

  • souperk@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    The 21st century has been mostly focused on finding new applications of existing technology. A lot of things are changing in pretty much every aspect of life, but nothing is entirely new.

    The internet has really changed the shape of our world, but, even though it really kicked off after the year 2000, it was invented during the 20th century.

    Something to keep in mind is that humanity is redifining what counts as an invention, a lot of ideas are created all the time, so the bar has been raised significantly.

    Also, we need to keep in mind how big corps have been killing innovation in the name of profit. New products are being created all the time, but they are bought by bigger companies and burried. This is happenig because these innovations carry a certain risk that an established company with a good revenue flow is not willing to accept.

    Personally, I am excited about the field of Social Computing, it is still at its infancy and has a lot of potential. The main idea is to create alogirthms based on human interactions that solve real world problems. A few questions one may ask include: How misinformation is being spread, and what is the optimal way to fight it? How do we fight corruption and authoriative power? These questions have been approached by a lot of fields, but creating algorithms and proving their effectiveness requires a deep understanding of computer science.

    • frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Personally, I am excited about the field of Social Computing, it is still at its infancy and has a lot of potential. The main idea is to create alogirthms based on human interactions that solve real world problems. A few questions one may ask include: How misinformation is being spread, and what is the optimal way to fight it? How do we fight corruption and authoriative power? These questions have been approached by a lot of fields, but creating algorithms and proving their effectiveness requires a deep understanding of computer science.

      I’m not a pessimistic person (I’m neutral), but the sinister implications are obvious.

      • souperk@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Well, I can see your point of view, after all computer science has been used for a lot of sinister things in our time. However, science is a neutral thing on itself, how we use it makes the difference.

        A great example are corporate social media vs the fediverse. While we can all see the good a social media platforms can offer, they way corporate social media have been shaped introduces a lot of problems. Given the circumstances I may argue they were a necessary step, but it’s definitely time for change, and a lot of people (including us right now) are working hard for that change.

        Social Computing as field would study this change, how people made decisions, and how it influenced both their lives and the society we live in. It involves asking questions like: How the fediverse came to be? How the transition could have been faster? Or, How it can be used for the greater good?

        Of course, these questions can be shaped in an exploitative way like: How the evolution of the fediverse could stopped or slowed down? How the fediverse could be exploited for the gain of the few? etc…

        In the end, I believe the question is who is more powerful, a few people with a lot of money, or a lot of people with little money? Right now the few seem to have the upper hand, but if the access to resources is the only difference, then I believe that we can be optimistic as science and technology have always been about doing more with less resources.

        • frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          In the end, I believe the question is who is more powerful, a few people with a lot of money, or a lot of people with little money?

          Coördination is easier for the former.

  • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Can’t tbink if anythung really, all we’ve done is refined some stuff butmaybe mRNA vaccines ?

    Mostly we’ve just enshitified everything and/or made it disposable…From headphones to entire operating systems etc.

  • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    CRISPR

    Corona vaccines

    Online Streaming

    Online Maps

    Wikipedia

    Drone Warfare

    LHC

    Paris climate treaty

    • xylogx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Great list! I would also add to this PCR, the technology that allowed us to map the human genome.

    • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      CRISPR is the closest we get It might be the honorary winner since it was wasn’t fully exploited until the 21st century, even though it was cloned and being used in the 90s.

  • Philote@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Although not very impactful yet, it think aerographene has the potential to be massive.

    • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Hell yeah on correctly recognizing what year was the first year of the 21st century! Thinking the new millennium started in 2000 is a pet peeve of mine.

  • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I mean we only have had fourth and things happen over time. So I want to say blue led but they existed before the century but just got the process such they can manufacture them. Native white ones are invented now but most white is using the combination method currently with the blue ones. Anyway if it counts I can’t imagine how much energy this has saved even over halogens for lighting and then for dispalys to. I would hate to think how much fossile fuel we would be using if we were still on incadescents and crts.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I didn’t truly understand how much energy incandescent were burning. Grew up with nothing but those.

      One night my AC crapped out in my tiny apartment so I killed the lights except one in a far corner. The air was so still I could reach my hand out and sense the heat from a 60W bulb.

  • BlowMe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Like it or not. The iPhone. It changed the phone and how we use it. I literally use my android phone for everything now, as a credit card, ticket, pc, social, gaming… some people get laid and marry thanks to them…

  • Wahots@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Hard to quantify, but stuff like PrEP (a drug used to prevent HIV infection) has probably saved a staggering number of lives across the globe, same with the yearly influenza vaccines.

    For a more personal one?

    I’d say the innovations to bikes, which have been staggering since 2000. Downhill mountain bikes have had staggering changes that make them lighter, faster, stronger, and way more stable, and they look dramatically different to their 90s counterparts. Stuff like dropper posts, modern full suspension, tubeless tires, disc brakes, and massive cassettes make them incredible. You can roll over a cantaloupe-sized rock at 20mph and the bike will just take it without you being ejected over the bars.

    Ebikes have totally changed the calculus in hilly cities, even in flat ones to some extent. Being able to effortlessly bike 45 miles and not be totally thrashed the next day is such a gamechanger, it’s actually beyond belief. My car has been largely collecting dust because most trips day to day are under 45 miles. And it takes pennies to recharge vs $90 or so to refill the tank.

    Bikes already help take tons of cars off the road worldwide, but ebikes could really help extend people’s ranges, particularly if they would normally drive otherwise.

    • Ben Hur Horse Race@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      getting from my house to my office on my old road bike used to take 45 mins and I’d be sweaty when I got there, and the idea of 45 mins uphill after work used to make me wanna off myself. Since I got an e-assist its 25 mins and I’m like lah de dah meep meep

      • TheFriar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Dude, same. My e-bike is hands down my favorite addition to my life. Where I had to deal with the train or the traffic and the waiting and the crowds, now I hop on my bike and cruise lah dee dah meep meep but when I am running late for work I’m all like eeeer vroom vroom skrrrt and I bomb down the bike path like aw yeah. And I’m honestly rarely late anymore because I get everywhere in about half the time it would’ve taken me otherwise.

  • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Those little straws with the filters inside that allow people to drink contaminated water right from the source.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      One of those saved my ass on a solo, overnight kayaking trip. I mostly brought beer, ice and food in my tow-behind cooler because I had a Life Straw.

      The trip was hell, most difficult thing I’ve ever done, wasn’t sure I’d make it out. Was good on water until the next day when I finally broke out onto the main creek.

      Cut the top off a can and sucked down 7 refills of creek water. Tasted exactly like warm, flat, tap water.

      • Rob Bos@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Look into Sawyer water filters. Much easier to use than lifestraws, last longer. Pressure instead of suction.