The U.S. Olympic team is one of a handful that will supply air conditioners for their athletes at the Paris Games in a move that undercuts organizers’ plans to cut carbon emissions.

U.S. Olympic and Paralympic CEO Sarah Hirshland said Friday that while the U.S. team appreciates efforts aimed at sustainability, the federation would be supplying AC units for what is typically the largest contingent of athletes at the Summer Games.

“As you can imagine, this is a period of time in which consistency and predictability is critical for Team USA’s performance,” Hirshland said. “In our conversations with athletes, this was a very high priority and something that the athletes felt was a critical component in their performance capability.”

The Washington Post reported earlier this month that Germany, Australia, Italy, Canada and Britain were among the other countries with plans to bring air conditioners to France.

  • WldFyre@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    If the country doesn’t become communist, calling yourself communist has done no good.

    • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      by what metric can you claim that veganism has made the environment better? pollution and resource use has only increased since the 1940s when veganism was invented.

      • WldFyre@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Lmfao that’s your argument?? It’s in “not even wrong” territory, literally what on earth are you talking about lol

        Coal pollution is also higher now than when renewable energy was first invented, therefore renewables wouldn’t help us! /s

        • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Coal pollution is also higher now than when renewable energy was first invented, therefore renewables wouldn’t help us!

          I don’t know if that’s true, but if it is, then you’ve almost reached the right conclusion. I wouldn’t say “wouldn’t”, I would say “haven’t”.

          • WldFyre@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            I said more than that, your “rebuttal” isn’t a rebuttal either, it’s word vomit and an appeal to futility.

            If you’re trolling, then 10/10