• zonnewin@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    I’m not a mouse, and humans have been eating red meat (whenever they could get it) for literally aeons.

      • smayonak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        They ate protein moderately and only enough to satiate their appetite. But if they were using storage methods ranging from hot springs to drying and fermentation they were eating red meat daily for months. Remaining meat was given to dogs (which eat unlimited amounts of protein). Fat was what humans ate in vast quantities. They’d go to extreme lengths to eat all sources of fat and marrow.

        Although this study though doesn’t make quite the same point that you’re making.

        The researchers artificially caused IBD in the mice by injecting them with a compound that damages their mucosal layer in the gut.

        So what they’re saying is that once you have IBD you might want to eat a low protein diet. This is consistent with diets that were used to treat diarrhea (which suggests ibd) such as the BRAT diet.

    • rustydomino@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Mice are omnivores like us. That said, just because something is bad for a mouse doesn’t necessarily mean it’s bad for humans.

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Gotta love all the people suddenly realizing that vivisection is worthless… thinking that meat is natural for humans but not mice… wew.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Personally know multiple carnivores who can’t stop shitting themselves and still swear by the diet.

    • xep@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I find that remarkable considering the fact that astronauts would eat high protein foods to minimize their bowel movements because the human body will efficiently absorb highly bioavailable proteins and fat (e.g. from animal sources) it consumes. Considering human feces are 75% water and the remaining 25% are primarily bacterial biomass and plant matter, my guess is the carnivores you know have just started the diet and have upset their stomachs with the sudden change.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        fact that astronauts would eat high protein foods to minimize their bowel movements because the human body will efficiently absorb highly bioavailable proteins and fat (e.g. from animal sources) it consumes.

        To minimize their bowel movements, astronauts had a high-protein, low-residue diet — think steak and eggs and other foods that are don’t make a lot of waste after they are absorbed by the body.

        Wow, that is a fun fact! I had no idea. That is going into trivia night

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I am a carnivore, and I talk to other carnivores. In the group people who only eat animal based food, and no plants: Our poop is consistent, infrequent (1-2 days), minimal, moves easily and not smelly.

        • jet@hackertalks.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          Your bowel movement talking point doesn’t match my experience, perhaps your prediction is just as accurate?

          • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            Maybe just google bowel issue research for your meme diet and all other proven dangers but clearly rationality is lost with something called “carnivore diet”.

            • jet@hackertalks.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              I actually have read the papers! But that is a different point altogether, let’s get back on track…

              this discussion was your personal experience with multiple carnivores who have persistent diarrhea, which doesn’t match the experience of myself, or anecdotes of other strict carnivores I have spoken with. I’d like to know what kind of diet your personal connections are following? Do you mean carnivore as in no plant based foods, or in that they eat any meat at all?

        • MBech@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          I don’t shit myself, and I eat meat. Your “fact” has just been disproven. Do better.

          • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            My fact? Did you read the article or did your dumb ass diet took away your ability to read too?

  • JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    For me this is a case of picking the lesser poison. I have IBD and FODMAPs give me major issues. This means most fruit and vegetables, plus dairy and wheat, cause major issues. Meat, including red meat, is one of the few foods which don’t cause me intestinal pain, bloating, and diarrhea. Studies indicate a not insignificant proportion of the population have issues with FODMAPs, and they also tend to fare much better with meat.

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’ve read lots of compelling data about IBD and a plant-free diet, do you have any experience trying it?

    • MrIlves@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      I used to have mediocre IBS symptoms. Never to the point of being debilitating, but such that I was always aware where the closest toilet was and got anxious if it was too far away.

      There was an article about studies being done on using common antihistamin to treat IBS that helped in many cases. Tried it and never looked back. That pretty much solved my bowel ussues.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        So would you feel symptoms and take the antihistamines to avoid the squirtybum, or take them ahead of eating?

      • JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        Thanks for the suggestion. Antihistamines help when symptoms are caused by histamine or histadine rich foods. Some people have overactive mast cell activity or produce too little DAO. You could also try DAO supplements. Which antihistamine works for you?

        • MrIlves@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          I use just the basic over the counter allergy medicine. (Kestox is the product here) It costs about 15€/100 tabs, so much cheaper than DAO suplements.

  • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Well… I guess we’re just not going to bother taking into account that red meat isn’t part of a mouse’s diet? And that maybe they’re going to react poorly when force fed things they generally don’t eat?

    Next, maybe we should see how well whales react if we feed them 3,000lbs of french fries.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      At the same time, a lot of places aren’t going to let scientists test on something closer to humans without something clearly showing a reason for it. The ethics board would wonder why they didn’t try it on mice first, and wouldn’t approve anything else.

      That they found an effect in mice would be good justification to move up a step. If there was no effect, then that would be the end of that.

    • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      I assume you went through the actual published article and have the necessary expertise to come to this “bullshit” conclusion.

      I don’t really know enough about mouse (and human) gut biome to know what the similarities and caveats are.

      • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        A quick google search will tell you what the primary diet of mice is: nuts and berries, small vertebrates and carrion.

        Not USDA grade prime rib.

          • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            Dude… it’s right in the article:

            In the animal study, mice were fed three types of red meat – pork, beef and mutton – every day for two weeks.

            Not sure where you the from, by where I’m at- mice can’t take down a pig, cow, or sheep. Even if they worked together with the other hunter/gatherer mice in their tribe and really thought hard about how badly they wanted it.

            • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              You clearly don’t get it. This is not about what they eat.

              If you mix two chemicals, they react the same way. It doesn’t matter if this happens inside a mouse or a human.

              Their reaction to it might be different, which is what the article ponts out. But the gut biome still compares to what’s inside a human, so if you introduce something like red meat, the measured reaction inside will be similar, even if it’s not in their diet, like you shallowly point out.

              • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 days ago

                Oh I get it. It’s entirely about what they eat. Otherwise, the scientists wouldn’t have FED them meat. They’d liquify it and inject it.

                Their gut biome is entirely different from ours. There are foods we eat daily that is poison to them. They as hard as you’d like, it this is bullshit science. Essentially an easy way to get grant funds.

                Nothing more.

      • Taleya@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        Garlic, onions, citrus and beans fuck up and can even possibly kill mice, so it’s not a straight comparison by any stretch

  • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    I didn’t know we had so many PhD level gastroenterologists on Lemmy, I’m glad we’ve attracted such an educated community and we’re not filled with reactionary nerds who vaguely remember their freshman zoology class.

    • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      When inconvenient truths arrive about people’s preferred habits, they often become instant field experts.

      As an aside, mice are opportunistic omnivores - this information can be found with ease. They will eat whatever the fuck they can find and will gladly feed on a cow’s carcass. This added context makes the instant field expert comments claiming they’re herbivores and that ‘this study is obviously bad’ even more embarrassing.

  • Geodad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Anecdotally, I’ve had way less stomach issues since shifting largely to white meat and a mostly plant based diet.

  • lanigerous@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Where’s that old Twitter bot that would append in mice to reports of these bullshit studies?

    • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Does the Lemmy post title not have “in mice” in it for you? I added it to the title of the post to clarify this. It should show as

      Red meat wreaks havoc on gut and drives inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in study on mice

      Whereas the original title of the article was:

      Red meat wreaks havoc on gut and drives inflammatory bowel disease

      • lanigerous@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Oh yeah absolutely, I wasn’t criticising you at all, was just noting the ‘in mice’ thing that’s all!