• acosmichippo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    This is just not true. Eating meat is a major part of what separated archaic humans from other primates; it is theorized that the calories from meat is part of what helped us grow our larger brains. Homo Erectus was hunting large game maybe up to 2 million years ago, well before Homo Sapiens even existed. They hunted to the point of wiping out many large herbivores of that time.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_erectus#Subsistence

    Since common modern human tapeworms began to diverge from those of other predators roughly 1.7 million years ago (specifically the pork tapeworm, beef tapeworm, and Asian tapeworm), not only was H. erectus consuming meat regularly enough for speciation to occur in these parasites, but meat was probably consumed raw more often than not.[80]

    • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Humans and human ancestors have also been consuming large quantities of plants for far earlier than that. Here’s another paper looking 780,000 years ago finding a wide amount of plants consumed

      we demonstrate that a wide variety of plants were processed by Middle Pleistocene hominins at the site of Gesher Benot Ya’aqov in Israel (33° 00’ 30” N, 35° 37’ 30” E), at least 780,000 y ago. These results further indicate the advanced cognitive abilities of our early ancestors, including their ability to collect plants from varying distances and from a wide range of habitats and to mechanically process them using percussive tools.

      https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2418661121

      I am not saying that hunting didn’t happen (it definitely did). I am just saying that more recent research is painting a very different picture of the level of consumption of it

      • Lumisal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        If a species is straight up annihilating multiple species merely through predation, it’s not statistically possible for it to be a small amount of meat. A wide variety of plants eaten, as pointed out in that paper, doesn’t mean it was mostly a plant diet - if anything, that means it’s likely humans primarily only ate plants while traveling during a hunt.

      • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        sure. never said they weren’t also consuming plants. but meat has absolutely been a significant part of our diets for millions of years.