Spotify is officially raising its Premium subscription rates in the US come July, following reports of the move in April. The platform is increasing its Individual plan from $11 to $12 monthly and its Duo plan from $15 to $17 monthly — the same jump as last year’s $1 and $2 price hikes, respectively. However, its Family plan is going up by a whopping $3, increasing from $17 to $20 monthly. The only subscribers getting a break are students, who will continue to pay $6 monthly.

Spotify announced the price hikes less than a year after its previous one last July. Before that, Spotify hadn’t raised its fees since launching a decade and a half ago. I guess it was too optimistic to hope the next increase would also take that long, especially with Spotify’s continued focus (and money dump) on audiobooks.

Premium subscribers should receive an email from Spotify in the next month detailing the price hike and providing a link to cancel their plan if they would prefer to do so. Users currently on a trial period for Spotify will get one month at $11 after it ends before being moved up to a $12 monthly fee.

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’m all for pirating, but tbh music streaming apps are a service that is still in the “worth it” range. Not where Spotify is going, but, maintaining a library of high quality music with all the assets, and serving it to all your devices over the Internet is not a small feat to do securely.

      I’ll probably switch to tidal for now while I start building up my library to include stuff beyond what I like…

      • PixelAlchemist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        You should check out Plexamp while you bridge the gap. It has tidal support built in, and you can self-host your own collection as you build it up. Then when you’re done with tidal, you don’t have to learn or download a new app.

        • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          There is no point to self hosting music streaming in my opinion.

          Just have syncthing sync your music folder on your SD card to your server. Everything local and available when you want it.

          Plex is slowly being enshittified too it seems, just slower.

            • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              I do, but the music streaming on jellyfin is nowhere near as nice as plexamp.

              Just syncing all of your files locally is far superior to either unless your library is like >250GB.

              Streaming is a different use case than playing your own music which is essentially what plexamp and jellyamp are doing with extra steps. There are much better local music players than either option.

            • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              I do for all my video needs, but the music streaming on jellyfin is nowhere near as nice as plexamp.

              Just syncing all of your files locally is far superior to either unless your library is like >250GB.

              Streaming is a different use case than playing your own music which is essentially what plexamp and jellyamp are doing with extra steps. There are much better local music players than either option.

            • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              I do for all my video needs, but the music streaming on jellyfin is nowhere near as nice as plexamp.

              Just syncing all of your files locally is far superior to either unless your library is like >250GB.

              Streaming is a different use case than playing your own music which is essentially what plexamp and jellyamp are doing with extra steps. There are much better local music players than either option.

          • Norgur@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Since all music services I’ve tried so far are laughably shit at that anyway, Last.fm is your friend. Besides, Plexamp tries to get you into a Tidal subscription and suggests things from there, so you’ll get stuff here nad there.

        • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Just some perspective: I’ve been self-hosting stuff for 7y now, started with plex on a nas. I have tried a couple times to get the *arr stack working, one at a time and fuck me it’s complex and the risk of fucking up the config and data crossing the clearnet without a VPN, noooope fuck right off with that. That risk/reward just is too skewed for me.

        • li10@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Done. Until it can’t find a decent quality option for an album you’re searching for.

          A guy I know decided to move away from Spotify and pirate music. The amount of effort he went through means it’s something I’ll probably never try.

          • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            This is the biggest problem for me. I have thousands of movies and 10s of thousands of TV episodes, but my audio library is still all the same stuff I downloaded from Napster, Limewire, Kazaa 20+ years ago. It’s too hard to find a good selection these days outside of a few private trackers. I’m in several private trackers but I’m not going to sit in a queue for 2 days waiting for an interview time and jump through hoops to join something like RED or PTP tier tracker.

            Not to mention I mostly listen to podcasts these days and when I do listen to music, I try to find new stuff that I’ve never heard of rather than searching for a known artist. This would be way too convoluted to do on my own with some self-hosted solution.

            • PixelAlchemist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              I’ve been using deemix, and for the most part it’s been pretty seamless. Stuff direct downloads instantly, but it’s all in 128kbps now unfortunately. Then I have lidarr monitor everything for a lossless version.

              • DjMeas@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                Are you saying Deemix only downloads at 128kbps? If so, I’ve been using it as well and download in FLAC. Also, I pay for the family plan which is $15.99/month.

                Edit: Ah, I’m guessing you’re not on a paid Deezer plan.

                • PixelAlchemist@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Yeah I’m on the free plan which used to include FLAC and 320kpbs, but they stopped doing that for free plans about a year ago I think.

    • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I use a cracked Spotify client but if I do legitimately pay, it will be for Tidal. I want that sweet sweet lossless audio people have been talking about.

    • Neato@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      As someone else said: it doesn’t replace streaming even a little. Pirating is replacing buying music directly. Streaming facilitates finding new music and trying it out. Being able to listen to anything at any time. You simply can’t do that with downloads; no one can download everything. Piracy in this case really just works for people still listening to their highschool favs and not people looking for new stuff all the time.

      • yeehaw@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yes and no. It’s more cumbersome for sure but I used to find music on YouTube and all that back in the day then download it.

      • SadSadSatellite @lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        It replaces paying for Spotify because its possible to download Spotify premium. Best of both worlds. Use Spotify or YouTube to find stuff, send it to a seedbox, load it later at home.

        Biggest downside is most phones don’t have SD card slots anymore.

        Sent from my (slightly salty) hacked pixel 7

          • RoosterBoy@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Yes, in fact there are modded versions of the Spotify app (idk about apple) to access their library for free.

            • Neato@ttrpg.network
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Do they work like ReVanced Youtube and just remove ads/restrictions while keeping account properties? Or do they work like NewPipe and block all the algorithm stuff, use their own accounts/playlists?

      • veee@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I used to download exclusively when I was younger, but as I get older I’m trying out new genres from different cultures than my own and I’d miss out on it all without a streaming service.

        In my opinion it’s worth it.

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Dear lord no. You can still use Spotify, YTM, and a host of other services to discover new music. The argument was valid back in the days of the excellent Google Play Music, but the algorithm has gone to shit since. There are also tons of sources of user curated playlists you can use to fund new music.

        I am 51 and if I let algorithms pick my music I would never discover most of what I find and constantly be fed thirty year old music. Just this past month I discovered mehro, King Woman, Sugar High and Parra for Cuva.