• DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    “Case by case” for political office is so obviously open to corruption you shouldn’t bother with it though, and felony definitions are already weaponized as they are between drugs and protest laws.

    Hell, for that matter, isn’t a public record of convictions already your best version of a case by case system?

    Each voter can decide which crime matters to them…

    I’m probably more likely to vote for someone that caught a felony for protesting.

    • 3volver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Practically I think that all felons shouldn’t be able to run for office given the nature of the system. Ideally it would be case by case, but yes it would be corrupted and used by those in power to stop people from running. We either need to allow felons to vote and allow felons to run for president, OR do not allow felons to vote and do not allow felons to run for president. Right now the system makes no fucking sense.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        So anyone who is caught with too much weed in a certain state?

        Anyone who “resists arrest” at a protest?

        No, fuck that. Felons should be able to vote and run for office, unless convicted of treason or insurrection.

        Which Trump should be.

    • Esqplorer@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s not case by case, but crime by crime. It should be decided on a basis of rule of law as to which specific crimes, such as those reflecting character and not just a lapse in judgement.

      Trump has many convictions reflecting on his character in this one trial.

      • zaph@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Problem with that is you can’t attack someone’s character in court unless they try to use it as a defense so there’s no way that’s getting into the constitution in our lifetimes.

        • Esqplorer@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          You absolutely can reference character. It just isn’t itself evidence of other crimes.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      weaponized

      My state has a law on the books specifying Abuse of a Sports Official as a felony. As in, “Hey you, the umpire’s a bum.”

      As you have observed, the situation has gotten quite out of hand.