• Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Based on what? Who have you seen be convicted of making deepfake porn? Under what law?

      • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Uhm, there have been plenty of cases of people getting in trouble for sharing deepfake porn yes. It’s sexual harassment.

        Well, at least over here in Europe, and it’s mostly been with teenagers, I don’t know the situation on the US

        But generally, making and sharing porn of real people is… well… that can very easily count as sexual harassement

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          No one said it was. What I said was that it doesn’t matter if it’s satire or not, it’s still classified as free speech, until a court proves otherwise.

      • SnausagesinaBlanket@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Under what law?

        Take it down act

        On April 28, 2025, Congress passed S. 146, the TAKE IT DOWN Act, a bill that criminalizes the nonconsensual publication of intimate images, including “digital forgeries” (i.e., deep fakes), in certain circumstances.

        • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Is providing it over a private channel to a singular user publication?

          I suspect that you will have to directly regulate image generation

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Hmm, interesting, thanks. Has anyone been charged or convicted with this law yet?

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            Definitely not convicted. That’d be some crazy speed.

            However, your insistence that it hasn’t happened yet so can’t happen is insane. There has to be a first case in which it hadn’t happened before.

            • Ulrich@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              8 days ago

              your insistence that it hasn’t happened yet so can’t happen is insane

              It would be insane if that was what I had insisted, but that didn’t happen. You just made it up.

              • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 days ago

                Based on what? Who have you seen be convicted of making deepfake porn? Under what law?

                Then you’re provided a law where it’d be illegal:

                Hmm, interesting, thanks. Has anyone been charged or convicted with this law yet?

                This seems to heavily imply you don’t believe it’s illegal until someone’s been convicted.