• terrific@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    As someone who was forced to start using Windows again after ten years after ten years of exclusively running Linux: Why is it like this? Everything is so crappy and slow!

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      Linux aint perfect either. Look at the memory usage of most modern “fully featured” distros. They’re using damn near as much at idle as windows is. Same thing going back 10 years in time.

      The key is with windows you get one windows, and maybe some tweaks. With linux you could go with a hyper minimal DE with not much in the way of shiny features and go a whole lot further.

      • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        I’ve never seen a distro take more than 2gb RAM ootb (ubuntu gnome and kde are probably the “heavy” contenders), excluding precached files. In either case, Windows or Linux, you lose big time the moment you launch a web browser.

        • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          The fresh install of Manjaro KDE on my laptop is using 2.6gb on a fresh boot right out of the box.

          I forget what distro it was (maybe neon?) that was using like 3.X gigs of ram on a fresh install. That was the point that I realized this wasn’t the Linux of old.

          • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            For shits and giggles I just tested out Ubuntu 25.04 and it’s only 1.3 gigs with it’s stock Ubuntuified de.

            For as much shit as Ubuntu gets it’s really not that bad compared to some of the others.

      • Squiddork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        Linux also uses a lot of ram for disk caching, it’s flagged as a form of available memory so there’s no performance overheard for this.

      • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        And ontop of that, they have no incentive to work on performance, if they made it better you’d have less of a reason to upgrade your machine, they want to slowly make performance worse and worse to maximize this effect

    • obnomus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      I’m dual booting on my laptop cuz I need windows for something, but 8gb ram is too much on Linux and the same amount of ram is too little on windows, Like I have 170 processes and 6gb ram usage at idle with my apps running in background, very poor memory management.

      • filcuk@lemmy.zip
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        I have recently booted into dad’s decade(s?) old xp pc and was baffled by how snappy that thing was…

        • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          XP was snappy at first, but then I used to install a couple of programs and things started to suck big time. It was always the registry. At the time, a lot of people I knew, used to just format Windows on a regular basis, also because the spyware and malware were so prevalent.

    • SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      It’s nearly the same for me, except it’s been nine years, and I’ve been using both Linux and Mac. It’s not bad enough to look for a new job, but oh man, I hate it so much.