• fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    Linux aint perfect either. Look at the memory usage of most modern “fully featured” distros. They’re using damn near as much at idle as windows is. Same thing going back 10 years in time.

    The key is with windows you get one windows, and maybe some tweaks. With linux you could go with a hyper minimal DE with not much in the way of shiny features and go a whole lot further.

    • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      I’ve never seen a distro take more than 2gb RAM ootb (ubuntu gnome and kde are probably the “heavy” contenders), excluding precached files. In either case, Windows or Linux, you lose big time the moment you launch a web browser.

      • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        The fresh install of Manjaro KDE on my laptop is using 2.6gb on a fresh boot right out of the box.

        I forget what distro it was (maybe neon?) that was using like 3.X gigs of ram on a fresh install. That was the point that I realized this wasn’t the Linux of old.

        • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          For shits and giggles I just tested out Ubuntu 25.04 and it’s only 1.3 gigs with it’s stock Ubuntuified de.

          For as much shit as Ubuntu gets it’s really not that bad compared to some of the others.

    • Squiddork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      Linux also uses a lot of ram for disk caching, it’s flagged as a form of available memory so there’s no performance overheard for this.