“social media” as buzzword (scientific speech, scientific image) and “social media” as political violence (commercial speech, manifest image) are two different beasts under the empire of law.

between The Delectable Negro and In Defence of Cannibalism (routley. 1982): and and and and?

1. metacognitive myopia explained why people didn’t/couldn’t update their beliefs about the existence of “weapons of mass destruction etc”.
2. dogwhistling the threat of sexual revolution “comrade kamala” (i.e., he’s implying hypocrisy when he doesn’t understand what lenin’s use of the term “prostitute” meant).
3. playing the fool until you can’t (i.e., making his base feel insightful and “seen”, homophilically/mimetically charismatic; e.g., his base feels like their inference-making is being promoted based on linguistic sympathy through the aura of charisma).

elizabeth warren lampoons trump and vance

seems more important that people wanted him to, even if he didn’t, as what a settlement might imply.

have books become too heavy for men?

since 2008 (the artilect wars) or the third “a.i.” winter?

the gettier problem

algorithms of oppression. noble.

institution: yet another non-human living asexual hyperobject constantly having sex with itself stopping only to shamefully laugh at the moments in which we respire.

ice cream truck driver

as a black person i’m worried that donald trump’s batting average isn’t showing the potential it should be this season. he should spend more time in the cages.