Quick, someone make a yt video that explains even less with more confusion and a word from our sponsors!

“Note: In the installation image, systemd-networkd, systemd-resolved, iwd and ModemManager are preconfigured and enabled by default. That will not be the case for the installed system.”

https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Installation_guide#Connect_to_the_internet

So you probably didn’t set anything up. Arch-chroot in to fix, or use a cable or phone tether to fix it from the new install.

Idk how to set up it with systemd suite, but for network manager it’s pretty much

# pacman -S networkmanager
# systemctl enable --now NetworkManager.service 

If we define stable as unchanging for release cycle, yes. Just really hard to come up with equivalence with these two otherwise.

Sir, either you troll, or have the wrong idea why the distros mentioned are different things with different goals.

In case it was intended seriously, I’ll probably descend into madness because of the ubu lts = centos stream assessment.

For 1, grub is fine, but systemd-boot is simpler, so I’d say that as ‘use grub if you actually need it’

For 2, has this actually ever happened to anyone in uefi times? Mbr overwrite was the good old times, now we have something at least better

Weird way to misspell desktop environment. Or wm defaults. A gnome reskin isn’t a distro.

https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/general_recommendations

Take your pick.

I had no idea ppl actually cared about any fetches, not like it stopped working though. Just a guess but it’ll work for a good while, because it’s a damn fetch script:D

Not reading the whole thread, but ltsc or looking into ameliorated playbooks seems like the right answer

Yes.

Five years on wayland here, it’s been great as long you don’t have single Nvidia gpu or need https://xkcd.com/1172/ kinds of x11 features