Games often present moral choices that are too binary. e.g. kill everyone or save everyone. In that case being evil would naturally be a lot harder because most characters would try to stop you.

Would be more interesting if the moral question is more ambiguous, or maybe have some moral dilemmas. Like you thought you made a difficult decision but the right one, (perhaps even with many in game characters telling you that you are right), only to find out ultimately you were the bad guy after all.

Man will literally go to India instead of going to couples counseling.

Well you are looking at the wrong part of the plant. Potatoes are roots. Have a look at the fruits of the potato plant, they look very much like tomatoes.

Clearly some people’s lives are more valuable than others’ /s

motherfuckers with a corruption fetish when I tell them about memory corruption and what you can do with a C compiler.

Only 1.3 bln?! What a steal.

Then I saved like a billion by not building a space station, or something.

You gonna practice what you preach?

Maybe wine/proton is just better at Windowsing than Windows is.

Oh shoot you are right, guess I have no choice but offing the CEO then.

it’s ok to not get radiation poisoning

Butterfly effect, your investments changes the fate of the companies you invest in.

Linus looks old now 😭

I guess that’s how time works but still…

Roll Navigate I guess?

True but this research itself also only has a 28 sample size, and respond rate is only about half too.

So just a conspiracy to funnel money into vpn companies then

This is honestly getting pretty funny.

What is it then? A complicated messenger?

You know the system is fucked when people who seek to maximize profit for themselves while making everyone else’s life worse is rewarded, whereas projects like Matrix, which is clearly a public good that benefits the society, struggles to get funding.

… I have some unfortunate news for you